Printable View
Very true, I am hoping Catalyst 8.7 resolves all the niggling issues, I will be making my purchase either next week or the week after, either 2 HD4870 1GB cards or the GT280GTX Ultra (which is released on the 11th of July, 738Mhz clock, 1666Mhz shader and 2520Mhz memory).Quote:
Originally Posted by Linchpin
John
Im not going through all those pages again, are you mad?!?!?!?!?!? :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by AbelJemka
Ill dig up some stuff when im less busy if thats alright :up:
Not afraid, just showing a point of view. You cannot flash inside windows, so its harder to tweak to find max clocks, how many reboots till you finished?
No way, its far better, especially if you're working with a limited dice/LN2 supply and dontwant to spend hours finding max clocks when on nvidia you can find it in mins.
I don't see how you can claim the 280 more power friendly but I'm not gonna fight that.
Besides no high end card is power friendly at load and like I said the idle issues with 4000 series aren't fixed yet.
As for the 4000 series over clocking....your comparing a 4% core overclock to what a 20%? Yeah a little unfair since we all know memory clock isn't gonna make a huge difference in FPS.
Wrong link, here's right one:Quote:
Originally Posted by 865pe
http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=14224
prove that sli/cf was and still is a niche product. :yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by 865pe
It kind of is but your also forgetting that, that poll is only of 85 people so far.
sorry :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by L7R
quick someone do a pro-nvidia pie chart..oops wrong thread:p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Caveman787
Then go back and edit your post until you back it up with facts :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch@pS
does ATI tool work?? how about that AMD GPU Clock Tool?? for 4870
i am ditching nv sli for intel mobo + CF this time, evga 680i is just awful, in terms of stability, they do have good customer support but i am tired of spending my money to ship it to evga, then get it back ~ 1.5 weeks later
And thats even by enthutiasts. Its a tiny unnoticeable fraction when you calculate everyone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hornet331
it was.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shintai
will not be.
:up:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mumid
Quote:
Originally Posted by bill_d
as before the Asus Maximus 2 Formula p45 chipset.. has no bottleneck even at 8X crossfired..Quote:
Originally Posted by Mumid
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=193751
somebody earlier said he needed gaming benchies.. posted some crysis benchies..
I can confirm when i had the P5Q3 i had no bottleneck either in crossfire, as my scores are about the same as my x48Quote:
Originally Posted by cstkl1
There is difference.
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/14...nce/index.html
sishh... some ppl aught to be .:frag:Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Evil
they are wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Evil
simple as that.
Agreed. :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by flopper
Wrote a small thing about this in my homeforum in swedish.Quote:
Originally Posted by SKYMTL
Found your post skymtl on your forum to be highly logical regarding the issue of p45.
:yepp:
Would you mind to point a link, thank you.Quote:
Found your post skymtl on your forum to be highly logical regarding the issue of p45.
Overclock 4800 with the last version of AMDClockTool :up:
link : http://www.overclex.net/data/images/...cktool-9.8.rar
credit : http://translate.google.fr/translate...&ie=ISO-8859-1
nice finally oc tools start to surface. :up:
the difference is at 2560 x 1600 apparently, so only 30" lcd users need to worry about X48(or x38) for now, it seems.Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Evil
Not. No matter if you believe the article or not, but according to the article, they need to worry unless they have X48 or x38Quote:
Originally Posted by adamsleath