BOINC benchmark: post results

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

10-29-2008, 03:35 PM
D_A

NM, I found the original. Don't know how I missed those two.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SiGfever

Here is my latest...
QX9770 @ 4.2
XSOS x64bit
5.10.45

Ok, I've been here a little while but I'm not familiar wit "XSOS". There's a custom linux distro or something floating around here?

edit: Ok, some searching turns up it's a custom Windows variant. I'd still like a little more info, just out of curiosity.
10-29-2008, 03:55 PM
64dragon

Quote:

Originally Posted by D_A

Those last two are on that X3330 as well?

yes, they are all on the X3330
10-30-2008, 04:43 AM
jcool

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcool

Dammit, 32bit OS sucks especially with Integer scores.

E8300 at 3,95Ghz (465x8,5) on Win XP Pro 32 SP3, BOINC 6.3.12:

FPU 4040
Integer 7586

:down:

Same machine would do 4050/11500 on XP x64...

Well, it seems that there is only a big theoretical difference between 32 and 64bit, lol. Machine finishes HCC WUs in about 2:37 average, that's maybe 2-3mins above 64bit completion times. Seems it doesn't care about the lower integer at all...
10-30-2008, 01:54 PM
SiGfever

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by D_A

NM, I found the original. Don't know how I missed those two.

Ok, I've been here a little while but I'm not familiar wit "XSOS". There's a custom linux distro or something floating around here?

edit: Ok, some searching turns up it's a custom Windows variant. I'd still like a little more info, just out of curiosity.

It is a custom rework by nn-step that performs very well.

Here is a screen shot of the time it takes to do a work unit. :)
10-30-2008, 02:09 PM
Martijn

Is that XSOS3? I might be able to use that on Sammy... Vista Ultimate is way too bloated for it, really...
10-30-2008, 02:20 PM
SiGfever

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martijn

Is that XSOS3? I might be able to use that on Sammy... Vista Ultimate is way too bloated for it, really...

I think it is the latest, good stuff. Contact nn_step for details.
10-30-2008, 02:22 PM
64dragon

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martijn

Is that XSOS3? I might be able to use that on Sammy... Vista Ultimate is way too bloated for it, really...

if you can't get XSOS linux would be great too ;) set it and forget it lol. dont know if you've tried linux before but imo, run ubuntu or kubuntu cause its super easy to set up and you can get Boinc from the repositories. no scripts to write or commands to learn.
11-02-2008, 01:56 PM
jcool

Same machine (mainrig), different OS: New BOINC 6.3.21 on XSOS 08 (based on Server 2008), Q6600@456x9=4107Mhz:

FPU: 3851
Integer: 10772

Time for Nehalem.. this thing isn't kickin butt like it used to...
11-02-2008, 02:09 PM
illidan

where did u get XSOS 08?
11-02-2008, 04:42 PM
D_A

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcool

Same machine (mainrig), different OS: New BOINC 6.3.21 on XSOS 08 (based on Server 2008), Q6600@456x9=4107Mhz:

FPU: 3851
Integer: 10772

Time for Nehalem.. this thing isn't kickin butt like it used to...

That's a 64bit variant, isn't it?
11-02-2008, 04:46 PM
D_A

Also ... are all the XSOS versions based on Windows Server xxxx?
11-04-2008, 06:17 AM
ZilverPhish

|| 3026 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
|| 9411 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

400X8
1:1
11-04-2008, 06:51 AM
Jaco

4/11/2008 15:48:25||Benchmark results:
4/11/2008 15:48:25|| Number of CPUs: 2
4/11/2008 15:48:25|| 4545 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
4/11/2008 15:48:25|| 9230 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

E8600 @ 4.36Ghz , win XP 32bit , Boinc 6.2.19
11-04-2008, 01:03 PM
D_A

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZilverPhish

|| 3026 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
|| 9411 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

400X8
1:1

What BOINC version are you using and which version of Vista 64bit (that's assuming the benchmark is for the rig in your sig)?
11-04-2008, 01:06 PM
D_A

Quote:

Originally Posted by [XC] Jaco

4/11/2008 15:48:25||Benchmark results:
4/11/2008 15:48:25|| Number of CPUs: 2
4/11/2008 15:48:25|| 4545 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
4/11/2008 15:48:25|| 9230 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

E8600 @ 4.36Ghz , win XP 32bit , Boinc 6.2.19

Jaco, is that XP Home or XP Pro?
11-04-2008, 05:05 PM
ZilverPhish

Quote:

Originally Posted by D_A

What BOINC version are you using and which version of Vista 64bit (that's assuming the benchmark is for the rig in your sig)?

Had problems with killing down latest boinc version so I rolled back to
5.10.45 windows_x86_64. Vista ultimate.

Rig is as in sig. 1207 bios though.
11-04-2008, 05:09 PM
D_A

Thanks, but are you using Vista Home/Ultimate/Business/Tofu/Menthol ... ? That part's not in your sig.
11-04-2008, 05:19 PM
64dragon

Quote:

Originally Posted by D_A

Thanks, but are you using Vista Home/Ultimate/Business/Tofu/Menthol ... ? That part's not in your sig.

duh, i think i know da answer

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZilverPhish

Had problems with killing down latest boinc version so I rolled back to
5.10.45 windows_x86_64. Vista ultimate.

Rig is as in sig. 1207 bios though.
11-04-2008, 05:28 PM
D_A

He edited it after I posted. ;) More than a few minutes after, too. Do I hear a "Sorry, DA"?
11-04-2008, 07:44 PM
64dragon

Quote:

Originally Posted by D_A

He edited it after I posted. ;) More than a few minutes after, too. Do I hear a "Sorry, DA"?

from what i see, you posted 1 minute after he edit the post but thats just me lookin for something to make fun of you on.
Sorry, DA :rofl:
11-05-2008, 06:15 AM
jcool

After finally figuring out how to do a service install with BOINC 6 (seriously, what idiot thought about that "run BOINC on an underpriviledged account" crap, no one in his right mind would do that :rolleyes: ) I got a little eco-cruncher back on the grid :up:

Dunno if I ever posted scores, so here I go: Pentium M 705 (14x100 default, Dothan-Core) at 133x14=1833Mhz, BOINC 6.2.19 XP Pro 32 SP2:

FPU: 1660
Integer: 3122

Not too shabby, considering the whole rig (!) eats less than 60W with BOINC loaded :shocked: (1,1V Vcore, Aopen i855GMEM-LFS mobo with laptop chipset, Matrox G550 DVI (no current ATI/NV comes close to that signal quality), 2x512MB DDR440, 2x WD1601ABYS RE2 in Raid 1, Seasonic PSU)

Oh and yes, it's the mother's internet PC :D
11-05-2008, 08:07 AM
Jaco

Quote:

Originally Posted by D_A

Jaco, is that XP Home or XP Pro?

sorry , missed that.
It's Win XP Pro 32 bit
11-05-2008, 01:00 PM
D_A

Thanks Jaco.

jcool, are you sure that's a 705? The only one I can find in that core series at 1.4 (stock) is the 710.
11-05-2008, 02:11 PM
jcool

aw crap, it's a 710. Sorry.
11-05-2008, 05:01 PM
D_A

No problem, all sorted. :up:

It is SO FREAKIN' NICE to be able to work these things out with people without having to deal with "I'm right and you're wrong because the Bible says I'M right!" type people.
(No sarcasm, I really mean it!)
I've been trying to collect this same data from another place and there's this one guy (read TROLL) who just can't help himself but to dump competing benchmarks from other packages into the thread and continually argue that HIS data is just as good or better for the comparisons we're using this for.
You guys are just genuinely helpful. THANKYOU THANKYOU THANKYOU!

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page