K10 Scores starting to surface

LOL...
This is NOT significant difference ...
This is HUGE difference i can say ....:rofl:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by informal

Hmm is English your first language?(not bashing just asking :) )

Since you can read it for yourself one more time(pay attention to bold and blue) :


I "painted" in blue the important parts to make it more clear :)

---

yes it is my first Language.

It reads that there is a difference in the two cpus, in that the newer revision runs Pi at 26 seconds, not a 26 second difference in time.

That's how I read it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Motiv

yes it is my first Language.

It reads that there is a difference in the two cpus, in that the newer revision runs Pi at 26 seconds, not a 26 second difference in time.

That's how I read it.

---

Well, english is my third language, and I interpreted it as a difference in time = 26s less, also considering that they cannot disclose any benchmark numbers yet.

Anyway, it looks quite promising, I think we all need a strong AMD and a strong intel.

PHENOM @ 3GHZ+ on AIR :clap:

Didn't I say not to worry about AMD?

This is gonna be insane :up:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SOLDNER-MOFO64

PHENOM @ 3GHZ+ on AIR :clap:

Didn't I say not to worry about AMD?

This is gonna be insane :up:

---

Thats great Dude, but if Phenom isn't pulling the same or better bench scores then Intel is right NOW, then AMD better just pack it up and prepare for evolution.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by [XC] M411b

Thats great Dude, but if Phenom isn't pulling the same or better bench scores then Intel is right NOW, then AMD better just pack it up and prepare for evolution.

---

if .... but until then amd ftw!!!! lol

I fully trust Gary Key. Long time bencher who has always been credible. Sounds like K10 will be very good chip...


Ply

I don´t now if this is new info or old so take a look
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/480

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by informal

Hmm is English your first language?(not bashing just asking :) )

Since you can read it for yourself one more time(pay attention to bold and blue) :


I "painted" in blue the important parts to make it more clear :)

---

Quote:

---

there is a significant difference in performance in all areas (26 seconds in SuperPI 1m for one)

---

I read this statement as SuperPI 1m being done in 26 seconds. After re-reading it I am still not sure if Gary is speaking abt the a difference of 26 seconds or not.

The statement can be 'read' in both ways, only Gary can tell us exactly what he meant and I am pretty sure this may have been worded they way it was as to not circumvent any 'agreements'

LOL

:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Plywood99

I fully trust Gary Key. Long time bencher who has always been credible. Sounds like K10 will be very good chip...


Ply

---

no not necessarily, the improvement from "B00 chip from May to a B02" is probably due to some important parts being turned of in the B00 (maybe L3 or even L2) - the fact that *some parts were turned off* was already stated somewhere - thus it tells us nothing about the retail barcelona.
and most agree that coolaler's results show a B01 that is going to launch on sept. 10, however we don't know if the results aren't fake.
but don't forget that gary also said this about the results:

Quote:

---

Actually, based on the last chip we had, those numbers are in alignment with some of the results we noticed and others as well. I think they will be better than that at release and especially on a consumer board with Vista 64-bit

---

6 more days until we find out :)

13s at Spi at 2ghz..yeah right =)
Some people need a reality check.

Who said it was 12s??? It is said the decrease from B00 to B02 was that..From what we know(nothing to be exact :) ),B00 could have score in a range of 40 to 50s in Pi 1m :)

There's no way that the SPi time is 13s @ 2ghz. If that's true, AMD would already showed it. The best we can hope for is that the 26s @ 2ghz is true.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ubermann

13s at Spi at 2ghz..yeah right =)
Some people need a reality check.

---

I think you got one comin' in 6days buddy :up:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by awdrifter

There's no way that the SPi time is 13s @ 2ghz. If that's true, AMD would already showed it. The best we can hope for is that the 26s @ 2ghz is true.

---

Why would AMD show it? They've never released any bench-scores early in the past....they're confident in themselves and their abilities and don't need to lure in buyers with leaked benchmarks ahead of time.

Only show what your good at, nothing else.
Thats how you get money to your company..

(and fool a few fanboys)

Smart ass is right ... AMD is a bit fishy ..... it shows specFP ... but not superPi? wtf ...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ScythedBlade

Smart ass is right ... AMD is a bit fishy ..... it shows specFP ... but not superPi? wtf ...

---

Why would a company whose success depends on the server market use SuperPi to lure customers? Nobody gives a crap about SuperPi except overclockers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hawkeyefan

Why would a company whose success depends on the server market use SuperPi to lure customers? Nobody gives a crap about SuperPi except overclockers.

---

good point.

cheers,

dave

THere's no doubt that Conroe is Superb @ SuperPi.

I just hope that the new K10 can at least come close. Somebody has to keep em all honest.

BRUNO

Bad point ... why the hell would anyone use specFP? XD

(*poke* why not int as well ...)

GG, AMD Fanboy ...

Why not put a video of every type of benchmark, AMD?

(self proclaims good point .... actually, it has to be, because everyone is wanting all the benchmarks of K10)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ScythedBlade

Smart ass is right ... AMD is a bit fishy ..... it shows specFP ... but not superPi? wtf ...

---

When you run Super Pi (in the version you most use) C2D's score waaaaay faster times but that ain't the only Pi proggy around.

Sys Tools Pi Bench gives a much closer result. SuperPi itself is an INTEL app IMO.