exactly the same? huh i would have though the thermals would have been better on my flatmates 770, that thing screams under load or bumps 80.
Printable View
Haha, throughout history man has watched as Nvidia unleashed the new fastest GPU in the world never to be outpaced by AMD/ATI...and throughout history man has watched as AMD/ATI responded with an even faster GPU never to be outpaced by Nvidia...and throughout history Nvidia then unleashed a new even faster................................ And throughout history man has gotten a new faster GPU every year because two companies are always competing.
:rolleyes:I will 'probably' show it to you in Q1 2014
Forget paper launches, let's launch rumors from now on!
:rofl:
successor of GK104, GM104 will be released Q1/14 and first Mawell IS 28nm chip, believe or not, but you will see!
I fail to see why NVIDIA would even need to do this. If the Hawaii XT card can compete or even slightly beat TITAN, all NVIDIA has to do is lower the GTX 780's price which would mean OC versions (which tend to beat TITAN anyways) would at least match AMD while offering a conceivably lower price point. Problem solved. :)
It would be mostly marketing reasons. New launches generate alot of press hype and with games like battlefield 4 being launched/bundled with the new card, there is a huge amount of potential to hurt nvidia sales. If these lose the single chip crown, it gives AMD alot of marketing power. If Nvidia were to launch something on the same day as the hawaii launch, it would surely take some of the attention away from the AMD launch.
They are reporting record margins. So not only are price cuts possible but big ones at that. I would hope that yields would have improved at this point to for gk110 since it has been about a years since these chips have been shipping to customers.
I'm guessing not particularly hard. Nvidia priced the gtx 680 (gk104 die) for a long time at the initial planned launch price of the gk110 die. So for one, that says they had a huge profit margin to sit on, and for another it suggests that they can easily price the gtx 780 at $500 (their traditional high end launch price, or at least as far as the gtx 480 that is true).
Hm, nvidia fixed their SLI microstutter years ago with little fanfare... AMD makes a big dog and pony show about partially fixing it YEARS late, and suddenly they have "better drivers" despite still being months upon months for profile updates and having plenty of other deficiencies? Sorry, but I disagree to say the least.
Hope you're paid for telling such BS http://forum-images.hardware.fr/imag...moderateur.gif
To be honest, there have been some issues lately, basically with all R320 or R325 drivers to some extent. Freezing (GTX 460 owners), cards not clocking down during browsing, corruption in BF3...but I wouldn't judge drivers on this alone or on a relatively short timeframe.
but that would almost be admitting defeat which nvidia would never do
in the past they have just left there prices higher and relied on marketing to make most people out there believe they are getting what they pay for
why would they change a good money making strategy that works
I didn't buy a 780 (I bought a 7970 and later a GTX 680) but telling that AMD got better drivers than nVidia is really a good joke.
But going from your side, it's quite normal as AMD is always the best on your mouth, even when they do cr$p.
Maxwell brings only a small increase in performance against Kepler, until 20nm production ready. Maxwell has great power efficiency, has Huma functions and is more efficient, its advantages are NOT Performance at first. It is tweaked Kepler with few new features.