The difference between mAJORD's score and mine is quite interesting. :)
DDR3-1600 CAS 7-7-7 is 3.57 % faster than DDR2-1200 CAS 5-5-5 in this quite memory intensive benchmark.
Printable View
The difference between mAJORD's score and mine is quite interesting. :)
DDR3-1600 CAS 7-7-7 is 3.57 % faster than DDR2-1200 CAS 5-5-5 in this quite memory intensive benchmark.
Shows how fast low latency DDR2 can be still :p
I should probably try for 1333 CAS 5 or something, but I don't think the RAM can do it
Score's 2290
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/938983.png
http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/5277/arauna2290wm.jpg
Pentium E6300 @ 400*10 = 4,000 MHz
Dual-Channel 6GB DDR2 800 CL5 5-5-15 2T
Radeon HD 3850 256MB (I don't think THAT will have any real affect)
Looking at the C2Q @ 4GHz's scores, I think a bit over half of that score is fine.
Memory at 1600 8-8-8-24-1T I tried to get the screen shot a peak load.
http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/631/arauna3421.jpg
i7-860 with tight timings 7-8-7-24
5830
Dell Latitude = 1401
Dragon backround with Intel CPU? Sounds fishy. XD
Put up some results...:)Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
I'm confused. :confused: I already posted my result a while ago...maybe I should run Aurana on my netbook. :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by dengyong
No I'm confused, I didn't read the whole thread. :doh:Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
just a quick post to say my mem is running DDR3-1810 9-9-9-24 :)Quote:
Originally Posted by mAJORD
Update.. Thanks for the Dual core results.. ;)
Corrected, pyro. Cheers
not much difference at 8-8-8-24
6087
http://i2.sqi.sh/s_1/zm/ara.jpg
http://www.numberworld.org/screenie_..._1_10_2010.jpg
Turbo was never able to engage. So it's 1.6 GHz.
I might try my workstation later on, but it's gonna be tricky because it's 2000 miles away at home.
So I'll have to do it through remote desktop or team viewer. Not sure what kinda of overhead that will come with.
Here it is... 4265 frames
As you can see from Process Explorer... The CPU usage is very poor...
This was done through TeamViewer... I have no idea how much of an impact it has on this benchmark.
(click to enlarge)
http://www.numberworld.org/screenie_...2010_small.jpg
Phenom II 3.8ghz
Memory @ 6-6-6-30-24-1T
Score 3717.
Definitely likes tighter timings. :)
http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/5045/3717.th.png
Here's an idea: why don't you tier the ranks by core count (2-core, 4-core, 6-8 core, 12+ core)? Just an idea.
btw: There's two X5482s in my machine. Not one. :)
Thanks for the suggestion. I've though about doing something like that,Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobsama
With Hyperthreading , Tri-cores, cheap multi-core CPU's, low frequency multi socket server CPU's its become a bit blured as to how to "grade" them!
I was thinking two options:
1. Seperate Dual quad, Hex etc
2. A comment / recogniton of "Top Dual core" etc next to the relevent result.
Fits with my own experience. This thing seems to hate multi-socket. It's not unlike some other realtime renderers I've seen in that regard such as Cedega's software Direct3D 9 renderer (SwiftShader). It nearly dies on 12 cores and runs MUCH better with 6.Quote:
Originally Posted by poke349
I like this idea. I'll finally be on top of SOMEthing this way. heheQuote:
Originally Posted by mAJORD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
A LOT of things hate multi-socket... lol :rofl:
You really need to write for them to get much out of dualies...
4904 on a dual E5450 @ 3.6 with 4x2gb FB-DIMM's @ 400mhz 5-5-5-x with i5000x chipset and snoop filter disabled.
65-80% thread utilization, 8 cores 8 threads, WinXP-64.
Up date !!!
q9550 @ 4.4 GH
http://i50.tinypic.com/m8yyc1.jpg
I wonder if limiting to one stick per channel might give better timings or lower latency... (I've got 4 sticks per channel in my workstation...)Quote:
Originally Posted by STEvil
Not like I'm gonna try it though... since I don't have physical access to it while I'm at school, nor do I want to mess my ram config anymore...
UPdated OP..
Well done Gaul!, big freq for a 9550.
Added some Classes.. and jazzed things up a bit, get a bit of competition spirit going :P
Let me know if you think it's a poor choice..
eg, No class for Quads/Hex.. they have the biggest chance of being in the top 3 at this stage..