HWiNFO32 v3.00 Released

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-23-2009, 12:33 PM
n00b 0f l337

New benchmark for the guys in there as well!
06-23-2009, 12:51 PM
Talonman

I like the benchmark!! :up:
http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/8838/works.jpg

http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/5378/works2.jpg
06-23-2009, 01:04 PM
Talonman

Quote:

Originally Posted by saaya

those are a loooot of thermal sensors :D
and i see you already added the new wide intel logos :D

Sensor City...

Sensors-1
http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/6844/sensors1.jpg

Sensors-2
http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/2243/sensors2.jpg
06-23-2009, 01:20 PM
deathman20

Pretty slick.
06-23-2009, 01:24 PM
sosna

Thanks for this!

Guys one question please.The projected temps contradict with Core Temp 0.99.5.They are 10 degrees lower.The same stands for pu.What to believe?

The rest like chipset and hdd are fine-the same.
06-23-2009, 01:31 PM
Mumak

Depends on CPU and factory set Tj,max
There have been looong discussions about this here, even Intel tried to clarify that. But the fact is, for most CPUs prior to Nehalem, nobody knows exactly what the correct value is. There are even certain models where this seems to vary from part to part and there's no way how to determine the correct value..

Quote:

Originally Posted by sosna

Thanks for this!

Guys one question please.The projected temps contradict with Core Temp 0.99.5.They are 10 degrees lower.The same stands for pu.What to believe?

The rest like chipset and hdd are fine-the same.
06-23-2009, 03:21 PM
sosna

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mumak

Depends on CPU and factory set Tj,max
There have been looong discussions about this here, even Intel tried to clarify that. But the fact is, for most CPUs prior to Nehalem, nobody knows exactly what the correct value is. There are even certain models where this seems to vary from part to part and there's no way how to determine the correct value..

The thing is that occt,everest and core temp show me 10 degrees higher than HWinfo 32.

I ve got a Q6600 G0 vid 1.2125,with 1.10 vcore@2,8.

My air cooling is decent with True Black and enough fans inside the HAF 932.
06-23-2009, 05:01 PM
BababooeyHTJ

Beats paying like $40 for everest, I can't wait to try this out.
06-23-2009, 05:50 PM
sosna

Quote:

Originally Posted by BababooeyHTJ

Beats paying like $40 for everest, I can't wait to try this out.

lol,fortunatelly it was a limited offer,Everest Ultimate for free.:D:up:
06-23-2009, 05:52 PM
sosna

i found that for my processor (Q6600 G0) Tj max is apoarently 90,anyone to confirm this?
06-23-2009, 06:43 PM
sokarul

Neat program but said my IP35pro supports DDR3 ram.
06-23-2009, 09:37 PM
Mumak

According to Intel info disclosed on DTS, that CPU should have Tj,max 90 C and that's what HWiNFO32 uses.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sosna

i found that for my processor (Q6600 G0) Tj max is apoarently 90,anyone to confirm this?
06-24-2009, 01:41 AM
sosna

So the rest programms are wrong.

Cause it seems logical now.

It would be totally crazy to have 10 fans with good airflow and little vcore and idling at 50 degrees celcious.

I also changed the value in Real Temp and checked my sensors and all were ok.

Thanks for your help.

This little progr rocks!
06-24-2009, 01:57 AM
Lightman

Works like a charm on both Centorino Laptop and my main rig from the sig!

Brilliant!
Tested on Vista x32 and x64! :up:
06-24-2009, 02:02 AM
Mumak

Thanks guys!

I'm preparing a new build (Beta) that fixes issues you reported:
- Nehalem Tcas, Trtp
- TPM Check causing BSOD (default will be disabled)
- Some sensor related issues, EVGA X58 SLI sensors...

will post it later here...
06-24-2009, 04:28 AM
dingdong555

Nice work!
06-24-2009, 04:35 AM
Talonman

I never officially said thanks....

I feel the need to do so!

THANKS for this super handy utility...
06-25-2009, 04:37 AM
Mumak

Hi guys,

here's the new Beta release I promised earlier with fixes to issues you reported:
HWiNFO32 v3.01-313

Thanks for your feedback !
06-30-2009, 05:17 AM
Mumak

HWiNFO32 v3.01-317
06-30-2009, 05:35 AM
IanB

I think you mean HWiNFO32 v3.01-317 ;)
06-30-2009, 05:37 AM
Mumak

Sorry - fixed :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by IanB

I think you mean HWiNFO32 v3.01-317 ;)
06-30-2009, 06:06 AM
IanB

You might want to look at the font assumptions you have made in your coding. Check out this screenshot:

http://www.i-asm.com/HWiNFO_fonts.png

The heading font size is smaller than the list items, and some of the list items are in a smaller font too. Some are in bold (for no obvious reason) where others are not. It's very confusing and looks extremely odd, the headings should be at least the same size as the list items!

I use XP with large fonts, this may be the issue. You should check what the user's default font size setting is before assuming that everyone uses the same size as you. It's actually a pretty common coding mistake. ;)
06-30-2009, 06:23 AM
Mumak

No :)
This is by intention.. There is a lot of information displayed and might be confusing for most users to find what's relevant. That's why some entries use larger (and bold) fonts - the more important the larger font (at least in general)..

If such a behaviour is confusing, I could make this optional (turn off via Settings - use same font for all items)...

Quote:

Originally Posted by IanB

You might want to look at the font assumptions you have made in your coding. Check out this screenshot:

The heading font size is smaller than the list items, and some of the list items are in a smaller font too. Some are in bold (for no obvious reason) where others are not. It's very confusing and looks extremely odd, the headings should be at least the same size as the list items!

I use XP with large fonts, this may be the issue. You should check what the user's default font size setting is before assuming that everyone uses the same size as you. It's actually a pretty common coding mistake. ;)
06-30-2009, 07:15 AM
IanB

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mumak

This is by intention.. There is a lot of information displayed and might be confusing for most users to find what's relevant. That's why some entries use larger (and bold) fonts - the more important the larger font (at least in general).

I'd think most people would consider the headings/sub-headings important. :ROTF: It's a complete reversal of standard information design to have the sublistings larger than headings and it doesn't improve the readability.

Having some information in bold (that you consider more important) is perhaps reasonable, but not the font size changes. What you might consider important others might consider unimportant and vice versa. If you've hard-coded "unimportant" information to a smaller display size then you aren't really considering all users.

It's an interesting design idea, but I think you'll find that as a default more people will find it annoying and visually distracting than helpful.
07-07-2009, 03:34 AM
Mumak
HWiNFO32 v3.01-326

Changes
- Updated reporting of Tcas and Trtp for Nehalem IMC.
- Added EVGA X58 SLI motherboard specific sensor support.
- Improved recognition of some LPCs.
- Added reporting of max Turbo Operating Point for non-XE Nehalem CPUs.
- Added nVidia GeForce G 105M and GeForce GT 220M.
- Fixed reporting of current ratio and BCLK for Nehalem in Turbo Mode.
- Fixed reporting of current Uncore and QPI clock on overclocked Nehalem.
- Added nVidia N10E-GLM, N10E-GLM3, N10E-GS, N10P-NS, N10P-GLM, N10M-GLM, GeForce GTS 150M, Quadro NVS 170M (GT218).
- Several other minor updates and bugfixes.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page