My CoolerMaster V10 Beta (56k warning seriously)

anyone know when the v10/12 retail? wherent both those at last years CES?... time to release em!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Klarko

anyone know when the v10/12 retail? wherent both those at last years CES?... time to release em!

---

The V10 will be arriving within the next few weeks. :D

any results?

shouldn't the TEC be in direct contact to the ihs and then the pipes on the hot side of the tec? how is the gas inside the pipes able to work OK if you are cooling them? i know it has heat from the CPU but AFAIK pipes have its right them and that is not whem cooled by a tec

Hows the noise on this beast?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Russian

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b3...0benchnew2.jpg

---

That compared to my TRUE120ex with a 1,000 RPM fan at Q6600stock, I believe the main temp difference is due to the 45nm process and lower stock VID but still a very good cooler by its own self, if i add an 800RPM fan on the TRUE id get a 2c flat reduction on the temps.

http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09046/stock_true120ex966.jpg

Holy crap i want one!

Any clue if it will fit in a Lian Li PC-A17B?
215mm x 440mm x 490mm ( W, H, D)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Demo

That compared to my TRUE120ex with a 1,000 RPM fan at Q6600stock, I believe the main temp difference is due to the 45nm process and lower stock VID but still a very good cooler by its own self, if i add an 800RPM fan on the TRUE id get a 2c flat reduction on the temps.

---

You can't usefully compare temps between two Q6600s...let alone a Kents and a York! :eek:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Russian

Im quite sure that these screenshots speak for themselves.

The reason i am showing my temperatures in real temp as well as in everest is just so i could compare both programs since neither really gave me very reliable temperatures and i could do a comparison with my old cooler. The thing is, my CPU has some stuck sensors but i know which sensors arent lying to me. :p:

P.S. like a real OC'er i went with Realtemp.

Without further ado, here is a beta screenshot of the V10's performance with a Q9450 at stock clock speeds as well as stock voltage 1.25 :)

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b3...0benchnew2.jpg

---

Tjmax for Q9xxx is 100C not 95C

here is mine Q9400 @ 3.2GHz with 1.25V under true black with scythe s-flex f @ 1200rpm

http://localhostr.com/files/e3f5bb/prime95.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by illidan

Tjmax for Q9xxx is 100C not 95C

---

Is the 100c also applicable to the Q6600 ?

Holy Crap!!!

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6.../th36_12_1.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Demo

Is the 100c also applicable to the Q6600 ?

---

No a Q6600 is 90C.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vapor

You can't usefully compare temps between two Q6600s...let alone a Kents and a York! :eek:

---

Why can't two Q6600 be compared? :confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fatguy1992

Why can't two Q6600 be compared? :confused:

---

They can...

But if you get 60C loaded temps with a TRUE with one and then 63C loaded with a V8 on another....that literally means nothing. If you're going to usefully compare HSFs, you must change only the HSF variable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fatguy1992

No a Q6600 is 90C.



Why can't two Q6600 be compared? :confused:

---

At 90c its only 1-2c above my ambient temp, so 90c is not valid and will never be.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Demo

At 90c its only 1-2c above my ambient temp, so 90c is not valid and will never be.

---

Intel said it was 90C, so WTF :confused::confused::confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vapor

They can...

But if you get 60C loaded temps with a TRUE with one and then 63C loaded with a V8 on another....that literally means nothing. If you're going to usefully compare HSFs, you must change only the HSF variable.

---

Ok I see.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Demo

At 90c its only 1-2c above my ambient temp, so 90c is not valid and will never be.

---

The further you are from TjMax, the less accurate the sensor becomes :-/

The 'ambient-justify' method really is not the way to do it at all. Measuring delta from TjMax is basically all that matters--forget that it even "equates" to a number in Celsius.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Demo

At 90c its only 1-2c above my ambient temp, so 90c is not valid and will never be.

---

Umm 90c = 194F doubt your ambient is that high:eek:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hutkikz

Umm 90c = 194F doubt your ambient is that high:eek:

---

What meant was, that his core temps when the 90C Tj. Max were used were only a 1C to 2C above his room temp.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by breathemetal

Holy crap i want one!

Any clue if it will fit in a Lian Li PC-A17B?
215mm x 440mm x 490mm ( W, H, D)

---

I have a LianLi rebadged Rocketfish that is supposedly based off your case. So i would say, yes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by illidan

Tjmax for Q9xxx is 100C not 95C

here is mine Q9400 @ 3.2GHz with 1.25V under true black with scythe s-flex f @ 1200rpm

http://localhostr.com/files/e3f5bb/prime95.jpg

---

The weird thing about that, is that i had it set to 100 a while ago... :confused:

how much does that TEC even help anyway?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chruschef

how much does that TEC even help anyway?

---

It keeps the temps low, and it helps keep the temperatures from slowly rising like some air coolers. I usually hit my max temp in about 15 minutes.

I think he's asking...if you turn it off, what happens to the temps? :p:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vapor

I think he's asking...if you turn it off, what happens to the temps? :p:

---

Well if you turn it off, logically, they go up. :p:

Here is your release date and Price!

http://www.frozencpu.com/products/85...ml?id=RAH5q2Aw

Reviews will be dropping soon!