Be thankful you got that far.
Great chip.
Bruno
Printable View
CPU@ 3.3 NB@2600 HT@2600 stable at 1.55Volts
http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/5729/nb26uw4.png
http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/4020/nb2600br5.png
maybe something like this
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c3...00auto2000.jpg
this series is at 3200 mhz,2000 nb, 2000ht, acc on auto, cpu voltage at 1.3875 and nbvoltage at 1.3750
on each succesive series raise nb by 200 and change acc +2. i'm curious how much variation there is between cpu and possibly board bios's on how they react. notice it took 1.3875 volts on my cpu. i had to set it there to run prime32. it seems to me other people are able to achieve higher clocks on less voltage but how stable are the clocks.
What is the max acc should be run at? Would it damage anything to turn it up more? I haven't tried at over +4.
not sure, im comfortable running it at +4. seen no ill effects from it. +6 allows me to run my nb at 2600. +4 and nb at 2600 crashes,i need to probably up nb core voltage to get 2600. will have to read up on it. actually gotvoltage was at 2600. ill check his posts for specs
Thanks.
I also read that it depends a lot on the stepping. Like some chips need ACC at a high "+" setting to run stable while some can actually use a "-" setting to run stable. I'll do some more research and some more testing. Hopefully soon I'll have new benches up, along with the Cine benches I have to do. For some reason Cine bench crashes while nothing else does. So hopefully I can get it working correctly soon.
just for kicks, here is a screenie of the temps i'm getting now that the thermal compound is more settled in. CPU is water cooled with a Koolance dual fan radiator and thermal take pump & reservoir. THe rad has 2 120mm fans pushing thru it.
My computer is also outside of a case, as you see in my avatar so that helps with everything staying much cooler, room temps is also pretty cool.
http://img523.imageshack.us/img523/8...empsjb5.th.jpghttp://img523.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
Ok, I just ran super PI, 3dmark (cpu tests only), and CineBench at default clocks.
Use CPU-z to see CPU clocks and HT speed, mem test for timings and NB speed in the top right hand corner
Super Pi
http://img111.imageshack.us/img111/1...7mhzki9.th.jpghttp://img111.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
3dMark CPU Score
http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/3...7mhzpr1.th.jpghttp://img264.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
Now I upped the NB Multiplier from x10 to x11, NB is now at 2200 MHz.
I forgot to run CineBench with the NB at default. So I ran it at x11 and then from now on we just compare with the rest.
Super Pi
http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/5...7mhznc3.th.jpghttp://img527.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
3dMark 06 (cpu score)
http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/9...7mhzqy6.th.jpghttp://img527.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
Cine Bench
http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/6...7mhzaa1.th.jpghttp://img408.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
What do you guys think so far, I have to head to bed now its about to be 1:30am here, tomorrow i'll do more testing and comparisons.
try raising ht link also
going from 2800CPU and 2000 HT/NB
to 2800CPU and 2400HT/NB gave me up to 20% gains in some benches.
Phenom 9850 CPU@3.3 NB@2600 HT@2600 Cinebench...
http://img523.imageshack.us/img523/1921/nb2600el5.jpg
here is some more benches to follow the ones a few posts ago, this time the NB at 2400MHz
super Pi
http://img375.imageshack.us/img375/3...0mhzhv2.th.jpghttp://img375.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
3dmark (cpu score)
http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/2...0mhzwq8.th.jpghttp://img253.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
Cinebench
http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/7...0mhzsf3.th.jpghttp://img507.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
ok some info I have gathered. So far by only upping the NB from stock 2.0 GHz to 2.4 GHz we saw almost 1/2 sec. drop in super PI, about a 27 point increase in 3dmark 06 cpu score, which when running the whole test would actually give you a bigger difference with the CPU feeding more to the video card (s).
In Cinebench, I didn't run it at a 2.0 GHz NB speed, however from a 2.2 GHz to a 2.4 GHz NB speed it increased 2291 points in the multiple CPU test, and 510 in the single CPU test. Last but not least, 52 points in the open GL benchmark.
Ok, now the NB speed back to default (2.0 GHz), but upped the multi from x13 to x14. Result is, CPU at 2.8 GHz. All voltages at default, actually CPU is under default as it is @ 1.296v, out the box it runs at 1.316v.
I owe you guys the cinebench one, I'll leave it running tonight, and tomorrow morning before heading off to work, i'll post it up, Just don't want to wait for it
super pi
http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/9...0ghzig0.th.jpghttp://img511.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
3dmark (cpu score)
http://img368.imageshack.us/img368/8...0ghzwj1.th.jpghttp://img368.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
Here is the CineBench at 2.8 GHz and 2.0 GHz NB
http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/5...0ghzts7.th.jpghttp://img241.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
Hi guy been working on a ACC setting, my 9850 has a weak core it number 4 . I have to bump it up +10% to make core 4 run stable running over 3.0 ghz the trouble is after i run the pc for a bit trun it off will not like to reboot when clock over 3.ghz at 3.0 and lower no trouble . With the +10%
on core 4 clock over 3.0ghz the cpu run prime np the AOD stabiliy
dam hit the botton to soon hear some screen shot running aod stability as i post this got any ideas on reboot trouble ?
Were you messin' around like opening windows or running something in the background while the single threaded bench was running, the single threaded score looks really low here. The multithreaded score is spot on, I get roughly the same.
but my single CPU score is 2928 .. (64-bit CB R10)...
Jack
when i have the pc clock at 3ghz all the cpu cores set at +4% and lower it reboot np but to get to 3.0+ i have to bump the ACC on core 4 up to +10% to make it run stable and it will run find the hole time but it just when i trun it off and try to restart it will not reboot it weird like you said Chicken patty