i'd probably pick one up if its real 120hz
Printable View
i'd probably pick one up if its real 120hz
http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/home-ente...ber-233642.php
Sure, it's about time:)
Will this thing take a true 120hz output from my video card or does it take 60hz and then fake 120 like the TVs have been doing? If it's the latter then forget it, I'm sticking to my FW900 which can do true 120hz and more.
Then the tricks they're pulling are real nice because it fooled my eyes. I went to a local place here and Circuit City to see several models. I was helping a friend buy a TV. I got ready to explain the Rip-offs and or Gimmicks. Instead, more times than not, I was BLOWN away. Who cares about how or what they're doing, it's the end result that matters.
there is actually truth to seeing at certain FPS, just the nay sayers ignore it. Its proven you cannot see beyond around 80 (varies a little from person to person like you said) and taht people who say they "see" the difference are just fooled by feeling it. YOu may not necessarily see the difference at higher FPS, but the way mechanics work in gmaes you will definetly "feel" the diffrence, but you conscientiously are fooled you are seeing it. Either way, higher is better in games, whether you claim to see it or not. Depending from game to game of coarse.
The trick works amazingly with movies and TV. But those TVs WILL NOT show 120hz in games, when hooked to a pc, or game system, they revert to 60hz. That is the reason people are conclusive about this. If they have figured a way to to display 120hz in games, im all for it. Hell if they use a trick for games im all for it, if its tricky enough.
A 120mhz display doesn't mean the interface or the refresh rate is 120mhz, it means the hardware display unit operates at that speed.
Watch a baseball game on a Sony then on a Sony with 120mhz technology, it just tracks the baseball without jaggies or blurring. Same in hockey or golf.
The pixels will still operate at whatever 4~9ms they natively have, but the engine is running twice as fast. The hardware is faster so the weakest link is now the pixils themselves, not the processing.
.
I hate 60hz it drives my eyes crazy.... yes i can tell and always turn up every system that is running that, it is also why i don't own to many LCD's yet.....
common viewsonic...
See, that's just what we were looking at, a Baseball Game. The pitch, the swing of the Bat, hot shot grounder, and the throw to 1st where were old school Pro Trinitron CRT clean=P
I don't care if they used AA and AF to do it, it was PERFECTLY done. Computer LCD's should have caught up by now. Come on guys, Hanna Montana in Blue Ray 3D, why? I know I still have a pair of old Asus 3D glasses somewhere:rofl:
The 120hz works well on TVs, bid difference in sports, its easiest to see in scrolling text.
I would love to see a true 120hz, however, that's going to put a big strain on our display cards. Honestly if the display has a method of "predicting" the missing frame, and can do it accurately, I'm all for it!
http://reviews.ebay.com/LCD-vs-CRT_W...00000002341549
NO FLICKER - There is no flicker on an LCD display because, while a CRT must be refreshed, the LCD has a constant source of light over the whole screen. Once a pixel is on, it stays on until turned off.
There are tons of "How It Works" and FAQs all over the web.
And for those who didnt read previous posts (003, CandymanCan) there's already a post on seeing or feeling the differences in FPS.
It has nothing to do with FPS as rendered by your video card... the refresh rate is independent of that as long as you're not v-sync'ed. It has to do with Hz (cycles/second). If you try to run stereo with 60Hz, it will be majorly flickery, you'll break the 3d illusion, and also get a MAJOR headache.
If this is a real 120hz monitor then my only response is....
YES!!
YES!!
YES!!
YES!!
FINALLY
I'd be interested in trying one of these as I used to play CS and UT2k4 quite competitively and generally at 100FPS. I still feel the difference from 60-100 ( namely the responsiveness of my input and netcode communications ) with todays LCDs but I'd like to see how these *new* ones would fair.