Originally Posted by
C'DaleRider
Guys, you know you're not going to convince leathal of anything, factual or not, proven by testing or not. Leathal is just one more example of the truth of P.T. Barnum's age-old statement, "There's a sucker born every minute."
But, as for how the cfm and dBA ratings are derived.........if you do some deep patent reading, you may begin to dig out the "truth" of the ratings.
For cfm......the ridiculous claims are probably correct, if you replicate their testing methods. Your tested fan is put into a sealed chamber and is exhausting the chamber....much like an exhaust fan's arrangement on the rear of a computer case. Now.....here comes the fakery...........the chamber is fed air by a higher cfm fan. The higher cfm'd fan essentially pressurizes the chamber, or box, that the tested fan is exhausting....so the tested fan has to do no work in obtaining any air into it. Give even a SilenX fan a positive pressurized chamber to pull from and it's easy to see how a SilenX fan achieves its cfm rating.
As for dBA ratings......the faker fans never mention what voltage the sound generation is being taken from, do they? Add to that the way the dBA is derived, it's probably along the lines of SilenX's testing for dBA generation......at the lowest voltage the fan will turn over, take 3 measurements, one on-axis from the intake side of the fan (NEVER the exhaust side.....that'd be too noisy!) and two measurements off-axis, all at 1 meter of distance, and then take the mean of those 3 measurements. Easy to achieve 14dBA or 19dBA or damned near any figure you want to put on your package.
I wish I was as gullible as leathal, instantly believing the marketing drivel and completely suspending all common sense in the process. Must be nice to live in the clouds..........