Thx buddy ;) This board isn't bad at all with latest bios. BTW, bandwidth might be better.
Thx buddy ;) This board isn't bad at all with latest bios. BTW, bandwidth might be better.
Very good results Xavier and I'm glad to see you enter 3D. :D
Nice before ... ;) :up: Got to say I'm startled by this board ... it performs much higher than my expectations :) I admit that I have never believed in MSI motherboards after some trouble I had ... Only 2 of 'em consisted the exception of the rule ... :D MSI P35 Platinum (yeah the one with the heatpipe trail, fancy huh ? :p: :D) and yours ... ;)
Hope we hear more from you ! :)
This MSI isn't bad in 3D with 16x/4x abd 5.4/5.5ghz with QX9650 is good :)
Thanks bro :toast: ... boblemagnifique and I did some better results with an ES board... :D BTW I'm waiting for an authorization prior to post them. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
Thx ;) In fact, the board clocks very high in a very smooth way. I've to figure out what to do in order to improve that crappy bandwidth and then I'm sure it can be a nice piece of hardware.Quote:
Originally Posted by George_o/c
Yeah :D Thanks for your OS dude lol...Quote:
Originally Posted by boblemagnifique
No prob bro , Win XP 64bits isn't bad for the 3D :D
:p: .... I know from this words my friend what need to know !!! hahaha...Quote:
Originally Posted by PonDTranG
He mean want to know your only tried only 2 core right ?
btw. neck have sound on speak seem core on Thai language, don't know why he
type " neck " :rofl:
:nono: Not only 2 cores... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by ZoLKoRn
Quote:
Originally Posted by before
Nice runs ;) But I want to see da real stuff :D
Bye
p€p|n0r@ng
Yeah... Waiting for Sham's authorization to post some Blackop stuff :D
BTW, I've just figured out the MSI P35D3 Vmch mod and started using it. Dunno but I may be able to catch the bandwidth deficit with more volts on the NB. In fact, 1.65V (the max available) set by the bios was 1.57V actual... that's a bit low, isn't it? :)
OMG!! The Vmch mod gives da trick!! 596FSB on water with my E6700 L633A :D I've never got better than 592FSB IIRC correctly, on a DFI LP P35...
I've set the Vmch to 1.776v and managed to get a CPU-Z validation at 593FSB under watercooling. (596FSB validation failed...)
That's the highest FSB I've ever reached with this CPU under standard cooling conditions; none of the following boards did better: Asus P5B, Asus P5K, Gigabyte X38-DS5 and DFI LP-UT P35.
http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/287...puz3559jt9.png
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=293892
MSI isn't so Bad ;)
Good Job Before ;)
oh....1G*4 STT DDR3..........lol
Good Job Before
very very Good 3dmark 01
Go for it!!!!! :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by before
Not too bad... :DQuote:
Originally Posted by 0cool
Yeah :D That's pretty nice.Quote:
Originally Posted by VictorWang
Thx marco... I'm waiting for your QX9650 dude! :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by marcolecorse
Ok GREAT!!; will post that later today!! :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by LardArse
I want to see some Blackop results soon :)
I'll send P.M later today to you Xavier.
And the pics of Mobo or not ? :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by LardArse
oh common guys just post info for that X48 mobo with pics already
i'm sure it's that you are all talking about :p:
Okay okay guys... here's the BlackOp first try http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=172458 :D
Finnally got the trick to use the 3 stager without making the chip running out of breath.
Time is awful!! :( F**cking low bandwidth. BTW I may have figured out a way to improve it. Will see tomorrow. :D
M/B：MSI P35D3 Platinum, Vmch mod.
CPU：Intel Core Extreme QX9650 L739A643
CPU cooling：3 Stage Cascade "Grosse Bertha"
Memory：Super Talent PC3-8500F 1024MBx2
VGA：Jaton 7600GS
HDD：Western Digital 80GB
Power Supply：Cooler-Master 1250W
Vcore：2.01V(Bios), 1.83V(Actual)
Vdimm：2.26V(Bios)
NB Voltage：1.776V(Actual)
OS：Windows 2003 Server (maxmem=600)
Misc.: Boot clocks 360FSBx15 (very bad idea... 359x15 would have probably been better by far!!)
http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/3...i1m8032ky7.png
Found something interesting on this board... :rolleyes:
Started with a boot @460FSBx11 to perfrom Everest benchmarks and then rebooted @450FSBx11; and so on; down to 380FSBx11. Last boot was done @399FSBx11, and system was overclocked with setFSB under windows up to 440FSBx11. (Available) Timings were the same, divider remained unchanged; I've just played with PL but results are given individually.
It looks to work only with FSBSEL jumpers set to 333. :)
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/7...ibootmrsl2.png
http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/6...ibootmwbt3.png
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/5...ibootmcay0.png
http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/2...ibootmliz6.png
A boot at 399FSB shown to be far more efficient than anyothers. Memory Read, Copy and Latency appeared significantly improved (even with PL8).
I've got tons of things to do; so I didn't had the time to bench more on this board. BTW; I've added a second solid aluminium capacitor to the vFSB area; and made some investigations on MCHBAR coding.
So; the memory bandwidth/latency is definitely better while booting at 399FSB with FSBSEL jumpers set to 333 strap. Of course, this setting also adds more stress on the MCH, and obviously varies with CPU multipliers. That's odd indeed.
In fact, stability is quite good with 10x multiplier, but becomes bad with 13x multiplier using the exact same bios settings... Why? ;)
I've made registers dumps to perform comparisons. Here are the differences (quite a lot for only a multiplier difference :rolleyes: )
I'll not come to details, but the first one which shines on my eyes is offset MCH+24A (FED1424Ah). Just check line starting with 24A. In fact, as you can see offset 24A = C6 with CPU multiplier 13x, and = C7 with CPU multiplier 10x. What does that mean? :confused:Code:399FSB
MCH x13 x10
140 FB FD
141 20 60
142 1F 1E
148 61 E1
149 59 38
184 01 61
185 9D 15
188 F4 E6
189 D1 11
198 00 12
1A8 01 02
24A C6 C7
36E 4C C9
36F C6 C4
52C 12 00
52D 33 21
530 65 43
531 88 66
A0C 76 77
A14 07 08
BC1 49 47
BC3 49 47
BD8 17 1B
BDA 17 1B
So, let me tell you. AFAIK this particular offset is where the CAS Latency (tCL) timing is hard-codded for memory Channel #0. It's a Read/Only 8bits value which requires electrical reboot to be changed. Basically, C0 = tCL1, C1 = tCL2, C2 = tCL3, etc. to C6 = tCL7 and C7 = tCL8. So, as can be seen tCL for channel #0 is 8 while booting at 399FSBx10 but 7 while booting at 399FSBx13. That's odd; knowing that I set tCL to 7 in the bios... :p:
Then, I've tried to boot at 399FSBx13 with tCL set to 8 in the bios; and the system became stable :yepp: 24A offset was correctly set to C7, just like while booting at 399FSBx10 with tCL set to 7 in the bios.
Guess there's a matter of bios coding here.
BTW dunno why, but LargeSystemCache (LSC) = 1 causes unstability again. :ROTF: The memory controller might be out of breath. What's interesting to note is that Spi32M can pass successfully with multiplier 13x and LSC=1 if I don't boot at 399FSB. It looks like something related to MCH data transfer limitation. I'll try with more Vmch; but I don't really like it. Actual tests were performed with 1.75Vmch (DMM).
How well does this board work with a-data memory?
I think so. :)