Printable View
Time Zone: 17.xx Update
Proc Speed: 2480.2 MHz
Actual Time: 16.57.063s
Multiplier: 6 x 413
Ram Type: DDR2
Ram Speed: 1240 mhz
Ram Timings: 4-5-4-4
Divider: 2:3
Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Chipset Used: P35
CPUZ Validation : http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=294770
http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/2...4801ghzad6.png
Pinoy Powah! :D
Time Zone: 16.xx Update
Proc Speed: 2678.7 MHz
Actual Time: 16.57.063s
Multiplier: 7 x 382
Ram Type: DDR2
Ram Speed: 1148 mhz
Ram Timings: 4-4-4-4
Divider: 2:3
Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Chipset Used: P35
CPUZ Validation : http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=294584
http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/7...678ghzlok9.png
+1, my rule if first iteration is good shut it down and start it over again :DQuote:
Originally Posted by luihed
Time Zone: 12.xx
Proc Speed: 3599.99 MHz (Based on CPUZ Validation)
Actual Time: 12.59.890s
Multiplier: 6 x 400
Ram Type: DDR2
Ram Speed: 1200 mhz
Ram Timings: 4-4-4-4
Divider: 2:3
Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Chipset Used: P35
CPUZ Validation : http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=296675
http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/2...12m5989mo1.png
this run is dedicated to my AMA ;)
you know who you are :D
The True Spirit of Pinoy PowaH! ;)
my new 12.XXX result..
http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/8233/3374hq4.jpg
Not sure if the QX is really this fast or I came across a new tweak or this OS is bugged but this is what I got for 11.xx.... Time is pretty fast but I didnt really tweak this run, timings are pretty relaxed, wazza is 730mb which is puny without maxmem and this os is for 3d:confused: .... I did use something new but Im keeping that to myself for now:p: ...
http://ocidb.com/albums/userpics/10062/normal_11_xx.jpg
it's not that fast considering mine and Jody's runs on conroes
with tweaking and rest you should be able to do that at lower MHz
i can't play atm as Gigabyte has poor efficiency in 32M and excellent efficiency in 1M with current bios files so just waiting for some fully supported bioses that will get me the same FSB as old ones
can you add Memset to your screenshots in the future mate? and what motherboard was this run on...P35 I am assuming.Quote:
Originally Posted by over@locker886
yeah Lui, we are on DDR3 and at high FSB which helps a lot but you should still be crushing 65nm with a 45nm. looking forward to see what you do on a SPi install though :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
also Lui, was your memspeed actually 486MHz and not 540MHz like Memset shows? the math isn't adding up if you were on a 4/5 divider at that FSB. until Memset gets its memory frequency sorted can we all please have a CPU-Z tab open with mem frequency.
First time for me benching with lower clocks and from what Ive done at 5ghz+ the 45nm cpus dont have too much advantage in 32m like it does on 1m... if you look at the WR database youll see what I mean but I was comparing 65nm times by Team Japan lol....
Jody, my actual memspeed in that run was 486mhz.... and it crushed my time before so I was just really surprised the QX made that much difference... My 3dpartition actually is pretty much the same as my 32M cos its just a 32M with 3d drivers and progs lol.... I think I need a new install cos Ive been using the same one since DFI P-965s lol...
Is this one ok? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
10.xx
http://ocidb.com/albums/userpics/10062/normal_10_xx.PNG
i have to disagree...look at the 9min and 10min categories here.Quote:
Originally Posted by luihed
my 65nm frequencies are substantially lower than any other 65nm (thanks to high FSB and DDR3) and sobih25's posted 45nm frequencies absolutely destroy mine (over 300MHz advantage) and i am at higher FSB on all of them. perhaps you aren't seeing as big a difference because of the low FSB (FSB means everything in 32M) or something but 45nm is definitely showing a huge difference in 32M in a lot of other peoples results. of course i can't fully find out the difference with a direct comparison on my setups until someone in Canada gets stock on E8500/E8400s but when they do i'll definitely be having fun.
thats a lot better considering your FSB and the mem speed. once some folks get some high FSB 45nm chips, the 32M times we see now with these QX9650s at 450FSB will look like 65nm times in comparison....mmmm, 562*8 4500MHz 3:5 933MHz 7-6-5 sub 10min :DQuote:
Originally Posted by luihed
it's not bad however hicookie and a few others have done that at 4GHz ;) :DQuote:
Originally Posted by luihed
Two better scores of Kielbasa Squad posted 3 weeks ago in Vic's topic.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=118
It's not pure LowClock Challenge, but as you can see, it's possible to reduce a bit CPU clocks. I tried do that, but pmp's blitz xtreme probably needs RMA atm ;).
@Dinos and Jody... Yeah you guys are right, it looks like high fsb is the best way to get the most out of these cpus, I need to find the right settings cos I have no experience with Quads..... The PPs of the wolfies will be out of this world and at top speed itll probably have a 100mhz edge over the QX... Cant wait to get my 632fsb wolfie :D, cant believe they have the 8400 today but I have to wait till feb for the 8500...
Thatll be nice... but since im still using ddr2, Ill have to settle with 600fsb x 9.5 1:1 4-4-4... I think I can live with that lol...Quote:
Originally Posted by 3oh6
who? what? where? you scored a pre-tested 632FSB wolfie? is that on air? i absolutely hate you if it is. i use to just be happy for you and your killer CPUs but if it is a 600+FSB chip on air...it will be hate and despise for you Lui.Quote:
Originally Posted by luihed
:D
Just dreaming my friend hehe... 632fsb is whats needed for 6ghz :D Ive been there with my QX so Ill be happy with anything 600+ benchable... still dreaming lol....
Since spi is what ive been concentrating on and 3dmark06 still doesnt turn me on as much as 3dmark01, I think the perfect cpu for me is the X5260... but I cant find one anywhere and the price is pretty steep for a dual core ( $851 ).... 575*10 1:1 would be pretty sick, and achievable with a lil luck.... no dreaming required lol...
i apparently scored two of them that do 600 on air cooling bench stable but they can't really do my past 530/545 :(Quote:
Originally Posted by 3oh6
could be some freak thing going on with that P5B DLX board he tested on which i will test here when i receive it :confused:
yeah Lui, not sure if that is worth it just for a 10X multi, hold out for the E8600 which is listed on official Intel papers...who knows when we will see it though. i am still waiting for my local guy to get back to me tonight to see if he got some E8400 and E8500s for me...otherwise i am going to just order a couple E8400s from NCIX.
i read something about that in another post of yours. i still have my P5B-Dlx so i will certainly see what wolfies do on it compared to the P5K3-Dlx and Maximus Extreme. i am just hoping for at least as good luck as i had with 65nm E6850s...all were 550FSB prime stable on air. anything higher is just a bonus.
This is the first Ive heard of the E8600... If its the E6700 of the wolfies then price will be $500+ which is good vs the X5260 (~$1K) .... But I think Ill still grab the X5260 cos the 10x multi might not be enough unless I see alot of E8500 averaging in the 550-560fsb which I dont think will happen.... The "go" stepping was the best fsb clocker and I think the wolfies are like the original c2d, maybe even a lil worst.... My E6700 can only do 570fsb on ln2 ( 530fsb air ) I need more than that:D ... also it seems the chipsets are getting worst as well for clocking fsb.... I really hope Im wrong though hehe....
Monteboy; can you share this nice little application? :D
I have to fix one bug when i finished the release version i send you a PMQuote:
Originally Posted by before
;)
While you're pm'ing Before, any chance you could PM me as well? :D
This Tool will be ready for download soon, for all of you.Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
simple easy waza tool? :)