AMD Unveils "Barcelona" Architecture

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by w0mbat

1024*768, 1280*1024, 1600*1200, 1680*1050, 1900*1200

---

give me a few min and Ill resize everything.

uploading now.

1680 x 1050 :)

http://www.theryanmartini.com/OCFJamesXP/Phenom.zip

http://www.theryanmartini.com/OCFJam...m/1024x768.jpg

widescreen version was modded a bit to make it square sized. I did the best I could to include you all. I will update if any problems are there.

Got it somewhere else on the forum, Linky

an xs member has tipped me off that the amd phenom name is hiding bellow the taskbar. i am fixing this now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FLG_Poncho

If somebody could put an "intel fist" going through that opteron logo I would be a VERY happy camper. :D

---

*giggle*

how bout one with this? :D
http://i171.photobucket.com/albums/u...nguin-slap.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rozzyroz

how bout one with this? :D
http://i171.photobucket.com/albums/u...nguin-slap.gif

---

OK :D

http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...-slapIntel.gif

:rotf: :ROTF:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SparkyJJO

OK :D

http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...-slapIntel.gif

---

:ROTF:

Any Kuma (is it still called that ?) info out yet?

Me needs some high clocked low tdp dual core k10 action :up:

Pekram

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hornet331

wopie for another marketing first... ACP......

---

That is how Intel chips are rated, its not new.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SparkyJJO

OK :D

http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...-slapIntel.gif

---

hehe :ROTF:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by terrace215

What a dud.

They compare a couple HPC apps and STREAM bandwidth measurement to a 2.33GHz Clovertown, make up a new power measurement ("ACP") term, need 120W for their Q4 2.3GHz part...

And they actually plan to use the "flushing toilet" logo for Barcelona?!? :ROTF:

---

So what you gonna do when your crap-2-duo comes second to a toilet flush? :rofl:

http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e3...-slapIntel.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by STEvil

That is how Intel chips are rated, its not new.

---

BS. "ACP" is a made up number used to give the impression of better performance/Watt because apparently AMD thought leading only in performance/Watt/$ would make even the most devout of followers go :rofl: :ROTF: .

Is it just me or was this just a stale repeat of everything we already know?

//Andreas

Leaked - AMD Barcelona versus Intel Clovertown and Tigerton

http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=735

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by STEvil

That is how Intel chips are rated, its not new.

---

its not, but belive what you want. :p:

even p-d 840EE smithfield only touches the 130W under rare circumstances, but same goes for the A64 X2 6400+

anyways 2 more days. :yepp:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pinnacle

First one to post Barcelona vs Tigeton benchmarks gets a cookie :)

---

LOL.....Down with Intel the TRASH that it is:eek:

Quote:

---

even p-d 840EE smithfield only touches the 130W under rare circumstances, but same goes for the A64 X2 6400+

---

/*OT
the 6400+ cannot surpass its 125W TDP, not in this world at least.
that's the chips theoreticaly maximum TDP not a number dreamed
by a marketing person in the night.
*/

It's interesting to see AMD fallow the same path as Intel in giving
it's chips a TDP number based on real world applications workloads.
Having 2 different TDP measuring systems was confusing for many,
now things should be more clear in this aspect.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EvlUndrWareNome

an xs member has tipped me off that the amd phenom name is hiding bellow the taskbar. i am fixing this now.

---

Could you please make 1920x1200 version? And "AMD" fonts are wrong

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by alayashu

/*OT
the 6400+ cannot surpass its 125W TDP, not in this world at least.
that's the chips theoreticaly maximum TDP not a number dreamed
by a marketing person in the night.
*/

It's interesting to see AMD fallow the same path as Intel in giving
it's chips a TDP number based on real world applications workloads.
Having 2 different TDP measuring systems was confusing for many,
now things should be more clear in this aspect.

---

ok, well thats your theory, and here goes your theory :explode2: ... the E4300 needs 22W under load and has a TDP of 65W... sure, some real avarage power consumption intel gives with its TDP. :yepp:

oh and look, even the spaceheater aka 840EE does not consume the 130W. :p:

anyways i dont want to drag this thread offtopic any further, back to barcelona, i really hope they are better than compareable intel procs, so intel needs to counter them. :yepp: