pls use Everest 3.50 or newer version... any earlier version has memory read result bug, gives u way too high score... not real result! pls update!
Printable View
pls use Everest 3.50 or newer version... any earlier version has memory read result bug, gives u way too high score... not real result! pls update!
If you're referring to my screenshot, then I suggest you do a little research about NUMA before accusing me of posting a "fake" result.....and if you knew anything abou NUMA, you would know that Everest doesn't correctly identify bandwidth in NUMA-enabled computers...Quote:
Originally Posted by laragirl83
@ MSI - Thaks....sorry I don't have any recent updates for the Quad Opty rig - it's been quite awhile since I last ran them...I'll update when I get a chance....
stephen, nobody has called your result a fake, you didnt even ran Everest did you??? Why did you get offended? relax! :)
laragirl was referring to Everest benchmark and Read bandwidht bug with 2MB Allendale chips. There are some 2MB allendale scores posted on this thread which show too high read bandwidth.
So yes please use the latest versions.
again please keep those results coming! :D
no offense, i wasnt talkin' about you specifically!:cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
and I also didnt say that those benchmarks were made on purpose with earlier version, maybe some of u just didnt know about the issue.
so i just saw the screenshots and it occured to me, that most of them 3.00.xx version:)
i tought i make note:p:
anyway here is mine, with Everest v3.80.934:
http://xs314.xs.to/xs314/07171/everest_read.jpg
Some of my test
Something like this you mean? :DQuote:
can you do 300x10 with the mem at 1200 that would be insane
http://img.techpowerup.org/070424/sandra_608.png
(btw, it is not on the ASUS 4X4 board)
It gets even better with higher CPU clock:
http://img.techpowerup.org/070424/sandra18800.png
Unbuffered is not bad either:
http://img.techpowerup.org/070424/sa...r1212unbuf.png
^^what mb was that done on???
Mine
Why are you posting processor arithmetic scores here??
E6300 440 x 7 = 3.08 GHz
Gigabyte DS3 rev 1, P965 C1
2 GB A data 8500 at 1100 MHz 5-5-5-9
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...6&d=1188210594
Cause I'm an idiot and posted the wrong screen shot.Quote:
Why are you posting processor arithmetic scores here??
msimax,
link (the 4x4 one)
The question might be not needed..but that FX74 it bugged macci?(if you did test that already)
Hehe, that's better :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Lancer33
BeardyMan, its not bugged, its NUMA! :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lancer33
Quote:
Originally Posted by LIKMARK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lancer33
lmao :rofl:
Bloody Hell!! :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by macci
Thats just F'kin Awesome bandwidth macci. Amazing results! :toast2:
Intrigued as to why the bandwidth Efficiency is so low tho! Can you explain?
Also, do ya think the next Gen of Intel Chips with their own on-board Memory Controllers will be as good?
I understood they were scheduled for 1st Quarter '08 when Intel released their Roadmap on the C2D pre-launch!
*Bump* - Did I say something!?!? :shrug:
you might want to read the thread the results are skewed, they are way off due to NUMA. i thought the same thing.lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Kin Hell