his 32m is actually pretty good for 965/allendale ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
http://afireinside.evilspork.net/AFI...o/4455-32m.JPG
Grats on the WRs man :toast:
Printable View
his 32m is actually pretty good for 965/allendale ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
http://afireinside.evilspork.net/AFI...o/4455-32m.JPG
Grats on the WRs man :toast:
AFI no your time is even worse LOL hahahahaQuote:
Originally Posted by afireinside
Show me a "fast" 32m at sub 4.5ghz on 965 please.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
Oh yeah and I was running 2*512 there. I've seen you're 32m times, they're far from special.
Agreed. 12min isnt bad for a 965/allendale.Quote:
Originally Posted by afireinside
lol i was just messing with thread starter to shave off those 5 seconds hheheh you need to relax dudeQuote:
Originally Posted by afireinside
and in terms of fast or slow times i go by what's been done so far and if allendale+965 can scrape in 12m times at 4GHz........it should be on target for 11m times around 3350 without too much of a problem
32m does not scale linearly.Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
you would think a X6800 @ 3.6 would pull 12s, doing it at 5ghz does not make it that much faster...
There are large diminishing returns here...
well i don't know what you've been testing if you can say that but i can tell you one thing >> SuperPI is all i bench/mess around with so i think i know a thing or two. I agree to your post to a point as there are many factors affecting the times including RAM and latency of RAM but all things equal you will roughly see the same increase and as you can see from the guy's benchmark he is right on the money for that speedQuote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
Great WRs TaPaKaH, that's what i call a 5 hit combo :D
I don't see maxmem=105 in his 32M run...is rather 1GB. Actually for 32M you need at least 256MB (IMO, 260MB, less kill time, not enough memory) cuz SP32M allocates something like that :p: .Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
You:Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/9...m08234ssx3.jpg
ME:
http://www.sspmustang.com/OT/E6600/3...2-32m-run2.JPG
I think I know a thing or two also...Your single 32m is a little slow there... :D
lol looks like testosterone is flowing a bit too hard there...sif take a 32M run that was completely untweaked against a conroe..........getting fast times takes a lot of time and testing. When i finally got the AMD cranking i had some beauties. Compare my AMD runs of 23minutes flat on 3.1GHz Opteron 146 or 2960MHz sub 24minute or even sub 21m run at 3476MHz. I bet you anything you weren't even close ;) :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
we have a 32M challenge at XS you should join the thread and compare how well you're doing :)
[EDIT] incidentaly Sierra picked on the same run HERE and i showed him that his time was slow with an inferior system right about HERE ;) :D
I dont play single core, I had an opti 146 from Vandi, but it was never opened :)Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
I only ran 25.xx dual pi on my FX60(~2.85, benched 1m to 3100mhz) with a 2GB kit, it is alot harder to throw down a solid 23 minute time when two cores are fighting for bandwith.
I bet your AMD rig @ 3400+ mhz was not close to my Lonely T2600 on air!
Water will be here friday, and I need to order some ram also... My conroe box is kinda apart :)
well look up the 32M challenge thread and see who participated and what the times were like and compare 32M runs of 2960 23m59; 3100 flat 23m and 3476 20m 58sQuote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
the guys i've benched against are all very good tweakers S7, OPB, BA, Dani just to name a few. BA is always tough to beat >>> just look at the thread and see his latest time with a mere 3.618GHz.....you will :banana::banana::banana::banana: your pants
it's the same deal with Intel which i'm new to and learning of course but clock for clock with good runs i won't sleep until i have everyone's measure as i did show in AMD benching
I have not run any single 32m runs yet :(Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
I have not decided on ram either :(
lol was just looking at OPBs new RAM....looks like your time is a few minutes too slow :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
http://www.teamgroup.com.tw/onepageb...32mddr1040.jpg
sorry tapakah i am going way OT here and i'm going to hide under a rock now.........any more post should be directed to my PM on this topic :)
Holy damn thats some SuperFast Allendale times @TaPaKaH :woot:
Thanks guys :toast:
Will try to keep up the good job :)
BTW - I did not want to set the best 32M result ... I wanted to see whether system was stable or not ;)
i like your attitude :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :D :woot:Quote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
Notice how he has a 2gb kit, not to mention I didnt even use realtime or maxmem! LOL!Quote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
The only person who needs to feel badly is you -- you called AFI and TaPaKaH out, and then you look retarded when your "uber leet 32m" is over two full minutes slower than a normal untweaked run.
If OPB wants to swing his ePenor around after he gets unbanned, good for him, but if anyone should be not posting stupid "my dad beats up your dad" posts it its you.
ok man so you're now becoming personal i showed you OPBs run and i told you to lookat the 32M challenge thread which i beat most of those top guysQuote:
Originally Posted by fhpchris
incidentaly Sierra picked on the same run you did HERE and i showed him that his time was slow with an inferior system right about HERE ;)
I will eventually make my way up to a decent clocking conroe so i'll give you and the rest of people in the right places a challenge. If you have something to show great, i don't mind and i like competition as you can see so i suggest you sign up to 32M Challenge thread HERE and show your stuff instead of acting like a little brat. Let's do some benching NOT talking in tapakah's thread!!!
i disagree and same invitation goes to you as well. You've benched plenty of AMD CPUs including that nice Opteron 146. Join the 32M Challenge thread and put up your best runs. Let's see how good you really are :) :toast:. You and I and fhpchris have plenty of work to do to challenge top level Intel runners from what i've seenQuote:
Originally Posted by afireinside
Very impressive TapaKaH :eek: :woot: :clap: Congrats on 5 in row WR's :toast:
oh GOD i apologise Tapakah I just realised you actually ran 5-5-5-x timings on that 1M and 32M runs :eek: that is very good indeed lol :toast:
i haven't got a decent idea what 1M is supposed to be like at those speeds but i tell you what that time looks awefully good considering others have been doing 14.xx runs close to 4GHz
OC was RAM-limited ... tried w/2:3 divider = RAM did not go over 560MHz (2.45V) :(
Should have used my ULs, but there are some compatibility issues between them and modded BIOS :(
are you able to tighten the timings to 4-4-4-12 at least for benching that is............bad luck about RAM limitation there.........mine only do 543MHz 4-4-4-9Quote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
tighter timings would give you a nice boost in spi if you decide to rerun it
who modded the bios and what was changed and why? also what impact did the change have pn performance comapred to 0507
w/4-4-4-12 they go no more than 501MHz :(
i seeQuote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
interesting you say that about fatbody chip problems i recently tested some and found they clock a lot worse on Asus than they did on Gigabyte...there was one timing in particular on Asus which on its own made a massive 60MHz different in OC at same timings and vdimm :eek: but i could still not get it equal to default timings and ram ratio and vdimm to asus..................strange :confused: