GNU: u can't expect too much from a newer 3000+ winnie, maybe try selling it and get a venice..
Printable View
GNU: u can't expect too much from a newer 3000+ winnie, maybe try selling it and get a venice..
Hi All,
I have pb with this ram
http://img119.echo.cx/img119/9210/img00383yg.th.jpg
, it never reachs 8000 Mb/s for Memory Bandwidth
:(
this my rockstable setting ,
[Gskill Sa roxxxxxxxx] :cool:
http://img165.echo.cx/my.php?image=27nn.jpg
I want to know what is the best setting for this ram, I used DFI NF4-Ultra D Bios 414-3.
my bios setting ,
1 2 3
Thx
Kamui ^^!
sandra buffered depends on cpu raw speed too so you probably need at least 9x305mhz 2745mhz to get closer to 8000MB/sQuote:
Originally Posted by kamui
oki thx ;)
Is not too much because many 3200+ Winnie owners reached 2600Mhz without any problems. My 3200+ is a product scrap. About Venice. Too expensive. I will wait :(Quote:
Originally Posted by S0nic
older winnies were good overclockers and had better memory controllers, but newer ones are crap, people who reached 2600mhz with their winnies most likely have older ones, venice should be the same price as the current winchesters, so if u can sell the winchester u have for a good price then u can add a bit and get a venice to take full advantage of your RAM/moboQuote:
Originally Posted by GNU
u could also sell ur 3200+ and get a venice 3000+ which should still overclock a lot further..
Older Winnies are better than newer? Not my CPU. My CPU is stable @2320 but not more. It's the worst OC @Winnie CPU. So i will see what to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by S0nic
yup, older are much better. Yours is a new stepping isn't it?Quote:
Originally Posted by GNU
yeah my 3200+ CBBHD 0445 VPMW
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...rpi-32m_tn.jpg
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...0_22181_tn.jpg
I don't know. It's a hard work to remove my XP120 etc... but i believe yes it's a newer CPU :(Quote:
Originally Posted by S0nic
CBBHD has the best memorycontrollers, according to user experiences.
Tommorow I will obtain a A64 3500+ Clawhammer, I will test how those memorycontrolers react with G.skill. I hope they will be the same as FX cores.
I think memory controllers on clawhammers are better than winchesters on average, but the chips are still not guranteed to hit high mhz although they do average higher than newer winnies..Quote:
Originally Posted by kakaroto
btw my 0504 MPMW's mem controller goes up to DDR600 no problems and I bet I can get higher, but I can't get the chip stable at high mhz, 300 x 8 is no problem, but 300 x 9 is not fully stable..
got a problem here with windows stability.
system is as followed:
amd xp3500 winchester
2x512mb adata pc566 tccd
dfi lanparty sli-d
tagan 480 watt
k the memory runs flawlessly memtest86 with 2,5-3-3-5 @ 2,7v :woot: . i used the memtest supplied by the dfi bios.
but when it comes to booting into windows everything fails. i cant even boot into windows with 250mhz and multiplier of 10. i ran that cpu with 2730mhz already, so this cant be the problem. i raised cpu voltag/chip voltage/ldt voltage, but nothing helped.is there any biosoption i could try?
same problem I have, no solution yet, I guess we just got bad cpu's..Quote:
Originally Posted by Huhn
was your 2730 overclock stable? because I can get into windows at 2750 and even run SuperPi 1M, but that's it..
I personally thank the creator of this thread alot! Before
260x10 and over that SuperPI fail.
Now 300x8 SuperPI stable :D
no thanks ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by PlatoonSgtElias
Thank you so much!!
I bought Geil Ultra X TCCD's second hand and i knew that they did DDR600 on the DFI and on a MSI K8N Noe2 allready.
I was about to sell them again since i couldn't get them stable even at 285 -2.5-4-4-8. I tried all available bios's and settings but no way to get it stable. Once i made it stable in memtest86+ and windows memtests but once i fired up Guildwars it craqshed to the desktop. (Guild Wars seems to be the ultimate program to test memory stability at least on my system.)
After reading this guide i started gto mess around with the less common settings in A64 tweaker and now it's stable at 285 2.5-4-3-6. That's good enough for me and i am very happy. My CPU and the memory could do more but my crappy board craps out above 285HTT. :brick:
Edit: One question i still have though: How do i get A64 tweaker to set it everytime i boot. I used "enable at startup" but it doesn't work.
Very good guide. Helped me reach my goal of DDR600 with my 'LD' GSkill memory. Currently running at 300MHz x 4 = 1200MHz HTT on my 3500+ Clawhammer and all seems good. Not time to start messing with my CPU speed :)
I need your help!
System:
A64 3000+ CBBID 0508
DFI LP UT nF4 Ultra-D bios 310P
1Gb G.skill PC4800LA Samsung 440 Brainpower 808
Seventeam ST-420BKV ATX2.0 (all molex are pluged)
The only way I could pass the 5th test of memtest86 is:
http://img89.echo.cx/img89/9189/imagem4od.jpg
Anything different doesn't work...
But, with this config, it passed memtest86 #5 and OCCT, I used my PC 30 minutes and it was ok... but IT CAN'T EVEN complete the SuperPI 1mb :confused:
Please help me :(
Oh...
I tried to pass SuperPI 1Mb and now it did it :cool:
My CPU is stock (1.8GHz), 6x300 and the LDT 3x300
What crazy system :cool:
Please update to the new bios 414-1 from Oskar Wu.
Then set Drive strength to 7 and Data strength to 2.
For 100% stability make sure you run min. one hour memtest 86++ test5 and the standard tests.
Can I update it to 414-2? Usually give better results with TCCD than 414-1.Quote:
Originally Posted by kakaroto
Sure you can :) I haven't tested it yet, only 414-1 and 3. Version 3 gave me very unstable system.Quote:
Originally Posted by higherøx
Ok.. I will test it now :DQuote:
Originally Posted by kakaroto
If you can, please help me here, too:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=61751
Thank you :)
I tested and 414-1 just gave me WORSE results!
I don't know what more to do... I'd like 300 2.5 3-3-6 1T or ~315 2.5 4-3-7 1T :(
My SuperPI sometimes does not work, shows errors (even when my pc is stock/100% stable)... What do you think it is?
Please, help...
Its very simple: its the CPU or/and the memory.Quote:
Originally Posted by higherøx
2.4GHz is about the max for a common CBBID winchester. CBBID's are not good overclockers. The memorycontroller sucks most of the time too..so..
If SuperPI still fails also at stock speeds, then the memory can be faulty. It depends what kind of errors you get. "Not equal things..."
HTT can be the problem also, at 300Mhz you may consider rize some voltage. I use 1.3/1.6v at 300Mhz HTT. Try it yourself. Experiment, you learn from your problems. good luck.
Ok thanks.
I will try to sell it and buy a Venice / Winchester CBBHD
Where did you found PC4800FF?
He doesn't have to find it, he works for G.Skill :)Quote:
Originally Posted by higherøx
Oh... ok :)Quote:
Originally Posted by [timko]
PS.: I wrote wrong, the correct is "Where did you find it" and NOT "Where did you found it" :D LOL :D :D
Thanks
PS.: When will it be disponible at newegg?
New results:
DDR620 2.5 4-3-5 1T 2.9v
http://img126.echo.cx/img126/3226/dsc042962tp.th.jpg
2400MHz + DDR600 2.5 4-3-5 1T 2.8v
OCCT: http://server2.uploadit.org/files/higherox2-imagem.JPG
F0ckin' A64 CBBID, holy :banana::banana::banana::banana: for overclocking, 2400MHz with 1.66v :(
Can I use 2.9v daily (around real 2.99v) with no problems (sudden death or lose warranty for example) in my TCCD?
Thanks
PS.: Like I said I am just learning English, you'll find so MANY errors :D Sorry
Very nice result :) for a CBBID is pretty awesome :DQuote:
Originally Posted by higherøx
2.9v is no problemo for TCCD. Make sure you put a little airflow trough the memory. (e.g. 80mm fan)
how can u put a fan to the memory? i dont know how to put the fan :(
^^^ This is one method...
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&postcount=57
playing with APACER PC4000 TCCD 256modules
300*9
http://img127.echo.cx/img127/4159/ap...60018xg.th.jpg
http://img127.echo.cx/img127/1604/ap...r6008ti.th.jpg
Thank you!Quote:
Originally Posted by kakaroto
My Venice 3000+ will come tomorrow or "the day after tomorrow" (I don't know how to write it ehaie :D) and then I will test it!
Do you have any idea to get 315 FSB with these G.Skills?
315MHz is possible, it depends on your board and memorycontroller.Quote:
Originally Posted by higherøx
With some descent gskill 315MHz is possible with 2.5-4-4-8 or 2.5-4-3-8 1T timings.
Let us know what the results are with your future CPU.
My highest is now 300MHz 2.5-3-3-6 1T for 24/7 stability use with 1GB FF.
Thank youQuote:
Originally Posted by kakaroto
I'm with problems with my Venice, it doesn't do 2.4GHz stock voltage (it's not normal... isn't it?)
But I'm using 310P Bios, do you think I should try any other bios? The problem is that 310P is the bios that works fine with my G.Skill :(
Any suggestions?
Flash the newest bios please... www.dfi.com.tw These have support for Venice and Sandiego processors.Quote:
Originally Posted by higherøx
I use the 414-1 bios, 414-2 works fine too. This BIOS support the VENICE and SAN DIEGO.
I'm using 414-3
:(
Their is a new bios available 510. This one is again available in three flavours.
The best for TCCD is 510-2 with 3.16 Ramtable with memory in the orange banks.
For TCCD set Dram response at FAST.
I also find out that test 8 is better and more accurate on errors then test 5.
http://xtremesystems.org/forums/atta...id=30495&stc=1
When test 5 is stable, also test with #8. The errors will shown on screen directly during the test, not after a pass.
kakaroto can you please post your mem settings ?
I have the same ones and some difficulties to get them fully stable at DDR600 2,5-3-3-7...
And you think 510-2 is the best for my mems ?
I'm using 510-3 and I think it's great...
Have you tried my settings from the guide?Quote:
Originally Posted by PicaXuu
Here are the PC4800 FF settings:
http://xtremesystems.org/forums/atta...id=30496&stc=1
Try differrent voltages, 2.6 - 2,66v - 2.7v - 2.77v - 2.8v then find the max stable memtest test5 & 8 run.
Also play with the the Drive strength en data, I used Drive strength 8 and data strength 2.
I've already tried those settings but can't pass test 8 of Memtest even at DDR590 neither DDR600...
Here are my exact bios settings with bios 510-3:
http://www.cyclopnet.pt/~nsl69249/bios1.jpg
http://www.cyclopnet.pt/~nsl69249/bios2.jpg
Can you help me please ?
You can change the read preamble to 5ns, and tref to 100MHz 1.95us in A64tweaker. I don't know the exact Tref setting in the bios..forgot it.Quote:
Originally Posted by PicaXuu
Try rise the Drive strength.
EDIT: I see you use 510-3. Try 510-2 and use the orange banks in case you didn't :)
Have you tried all voltages?
Thanks for your help kakaroto !
I've just set DRAM Drive Strength to 7 and now everything is OK !
Rock stable DDR600 2,5-3-3-6 @ 2,6v !
I'm already using orange banks,
I think it's not necessary to try 510-2, what do you think ?
My San Diego 3700+ Rock Stable at 9x290 1:1 2,5-3-3-5
1.95 100mhz = 3684 in bios
Glad to hear my help works :) have fun.Quote:
Originally Posted by PicaXuu
Is that 32M pi stable?
Thnx artic-k20 :)
Where can I find 510-2 for download?
thanks
Here.Quote:
Originally Posted by higherøx
Yep kakaroto Pi 32M rock stable !!! :)
Great!! I cannot do 32M fully with my Clawhammer 3500+.. Hopefully with a better controller on the 3700+ SD :)Quote:
Originally Posted by PicaXuu
Good job! :toast:
Thank you very much man :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Transonic
Now with 510-2
A64 Venice 3000+ @ 2.4GHz 300x8 1.525v :(
1Gb G.Skill PC4800LA @ DDR600 2.5 4-3-5 1T 2.8v
I tested my system in Memory Bandwidth Benchmark (SiSoft Sandra) and I get only 6680/6628 in the 1st. run and 6686/6620 in the 2nd. run.
It's terrible... isn't it?
What could I change? What setting is the problematic setting?
http://img237.echo.cx/img237/5977/imagem1rd.jpg
My Venice is REALLY a bad overclocker.
What voltage can I put in LDT and Chipset with no chance of getting any problems?
Thanks
510-2 gave me so much better results
I could get the same results, but with more agressive settings and less 0.1v, going from 2.8v to 2.7v.
With other bios I couldn't pass memtest stable with 315FSB even with 2.9v, with 510-2, I almost passed this goal with 2.8v, but I got 2 errors in memtest #5, can you help me?
I'd like so much using 315FSB with 2.8v, because I'm not sure if I could use 2.9v daily.
Settings for 300 FSB 2.7v:
http://img246.echo.cx/img246/3321/dsc044726hh.jpg
http://img246.echo.cx/img246/8726/dsc044692gx.jpg
http://img246.echo.cx/img246/1045/dsc044702oo.jpg
When I got 2 errors in memtest86 315FSB 2.8v, the settings were (in order):
2.5
04
06 (05, 07 and 08 = worse)
03
14
16
03 (or 02-02-02-02 was the same)
03 (or 02-02-02-02 was the same)
02 (or 02-02-02-02 was the same)
03 (or 02-02-02-02 was the same)
3072 (4708 always were better, but with this bios it isn't)
01 Bus Clock (better than Auto)
Enabled
Auto
0 (255+ = worse)
Level 7
Level 2
8ns (9ns = worse)
Fast
5ns (Auto = worse)
256Cycles
Enable
16x (8x was worse/the same)
07x
Disable
Pleae help me!! I'd like 315 FSB 2.5 4-3 :)
[]'s
Anyone with Ocz PC3200 Rev2 memorys who using 510-x ? I need a good setup and should i use Tref 3072 also? Have a DFI NF4 Ultra-D and a SD 3700+
@kakaroto,
i read in a post by ocz tony that running a system under phase increases the drive strength so that you need to lower it in order to overclock well. have you noticed this with tccd? i'm running gskill LE @ 287 2.5-4-3-7 on SD now. 2.5-3-3-7 won't go at 275 and above
Uhm no. I also have a LS but the TCCD results on air and Phase are here the quiet the same.Quote:
Originally Posted by jikdoc
When Timings are tighter then stronger drive strength come handy.
When looser the timings then you can try lowering the drive strength.
Remember, when upping the drive strength you may lower the Vddr to make it stable.
With TCCD I always use drive strength 7 and data strength 2 with Vddr 2.7v. With BH5/UTT I use 7/8 and 1/2 (depend on your ram test results)
So 510-2 (with 3.16 ram table) is better for TCCD?
Anyway, at the moment my best is DDR630 7-4-4-2.5 spi 32M stable (with 2.9V and bios 510-3) :)
PS: with a CBBID :fact: :hehe:
Good question that I want to know, too.Quote:
Originally Posted by XiN
I don't know if I use 510-1, 510-2 or 510-3. G.Skill 4800LA.
I heard that 510-2 is better for UTT, but I'm not sure.
Thanks, []'s
510-2 is suppose to be for UTT/BH-5 (510-1=TCCD, 510-3=everything) but I've seen several people use it with TCCD also. Personally I didn't notice anything even though 510-2 let's you use both the orange or yellow slots for dual channel. I had to go back to 310p for it to OC stable.Quote:
Originally Posted by higherøx
So, I have TCCD I think I'd use 510-1... hummm
Isn't 510-1 generic and 510-3 for TCCD? Uhm ... just little confused :D
Anyway, I'll try 510-2 too ;)
nope, with 510-3 you can use orange and yellow slots because this bios is two memory table compatible.Quote:
Originally Posted by XiN
For UTT/BH5 the best bios is 510-2 and TCCD/TCC5 best is 510-1.
Ok, thx :)Quote:
Originally Posted by kakaroto
So this http://www.techpowerup.com/articles/other/114 is wrong ...
Quote:
(* -1 for both kinds of rams, -3 for TCCD etc., -2 for BH5/CH5 etc.)
I just can't get my G.Skills stable at 300 2.5 4-3-6 with 2.6v :(
Hi everybody here,
I'm new in this forums, i watch you a long time and now i said; i must join the community :banana:
My Problem is the following:
Systems Specs.:
DFI NF4 Ultra
1GB OCZ Platinum Ed. Rev. 2 with Samsung TCCD 440 Chips on it
Athlon 64 3200 Winchester
X800XTPE
I wanna get 300Mhz @ 2,5-3-3-6 stable, but i can't get it. I tested a lot of confÃ:banana:gurations but nothing bring 300Mhz fully stable @ 2,5-3-3-5. FarCry chrashes after 15Min. but Memtest did 30Min. without errors.
Here are my setting in Bios:
http://tobias.ownagi.com/mem1.jpg
http://tobias.ownagi.com/mem2.jpg
http://tobias.ownagi.com/mem3.jpg
can someone tell me what i should change, but i didn't want to change TRCD to 4 :D
These memories cant do 300 at 2.5-3-3-5 , i can only do 278 or so. And 305 at 2.5-4-3-7 (2.9V)
Agreed.
My G.Skill's Samsung 440 just CAN'T run at 2.5 3-3.
And it was not easy to reach the total stability at 2.5 4-3-6 1T 2.7v.
Well it's kinda like they said ^ it's hard enough to get G. Skill to do 2.5-3-3 @ 300 let alone Platinum Rev.2, try 2.5-4-4 instead. I spent the better part of yesterday morning trying to get 290 & 300 FSB to pass memtest and I got pretty damn close with these settings while at 2.5-3-3-7 but 2.5-4-4-7 was what got me to pass:Quote:
Originally Posted by Murdock_TF
Genie:
290-300 FSB
3x HTT
9x Multi (10x hasn't worked for me yet)
1.55v Startup
1.4v
113%
1.3v LDT
1.7v NB
2.8v RAM (little or no errors compared to 2.7v in memtest, 2.9 showed no improvement)
DRAM Config:
200 1:1
2.5
4
7
4
10
14
2
2
2
2
1032 (4708 was a close 2nd best, I tried just about all of them)
1
enabled
increase skew (auto & 0 gave me a bunch of errors)
255 (tried 200, 100, 50, the lower the # the more the errors)
Level 7
Level 2
8ns (slightly more stable than 7ns)
5ns
256 cycles (everything stock from here down)
disabled
16x
7x
disabled
I'm chillin at 260x10 atm cuz it's rock solid without distortion on my screen. I'm gonna RMA my graphics card probably this week which, according to BFG, should clear up the crap on the screen. If that doesn't work then my CPU is next. I'm also gonna try to flash my bios again now that I got some good/stable settings to try. Currently I'm running the 310p bios. Hope this helps.
Why?Quote:
Originally Posted by Transonic
I ever used 1.4v at startup that's my default, I did it wrong? :(
Thanks
Well that didn't really make much of a difference for me, I was kinda emphasizing on the DRAM configuration settings/timings rather than voltages.Quote:
Originally Posted by higherøx
Which gives the better performance for TCCD, Skew Value 255+ or 0 "Auto"?
And which of them give better stability?
T H A N K S
I can explain to you, but OPB has a much more and clearer article about DQS. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by higherøx
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&highlight=DQS
Thanks :)
Other thing that's interesting is that trrd, twr, twtr and trwt were running here at 02-02-01-02, I just couldn't pass SuperPI 32Mb, then I put 03-02-02-03 and I didn't lose much performance but reach the stability.
Data strength for TCCD: I know that Level 1 and 3 are more stable, and 2 is better for UTT and BH series. But here Level 2 gave me stability. But what is FASTER for TCCD, Level 1 or Level 3?
Thank you
Start post is updated with San-diego memory stability tweaks :)
If anyone has more findings about the Venice and/or San-diego please share here. thank you!
Hmm, I guess I'll get going and try out 510-2...seeing as never bothered, seeing that it was sposed to be "for" BH5/UTT.
Great guide! Thanks alot for that.
Before I got my OCZ to ~275MHz 2.5-3-3-7 with 2.73V, now it'll do 285MHz 2.5-3-3-6 or even 290MHz, the latter with 2.83V.
Still I'm not able to get to 300, but maybe that has some other reason, who knows? ;)
Using bios 510-2 right now by the way.
Use 3.3v line when DRAM is not 3.2v... what it changes?
Thanks
For some time I stopped o/c cause of time. Now I've tried 5xx-3 bios and using the same settings as in 310P I couldn't load the windows. I must tried lower alphas (trc, trfc and max. async) to load windows. It's normally?
kakaroto: Hey thanks for the great read! However, I am curious. Would you change the drive strength values if your TCCD seemed to respond better to 3.1v?
Good idea, I'm not sure either....can't remember if I actually saw any gains out of my ram at higher then 2.9v....but it'd be nice to know what i should be changing, if anything...if I end up crankin' 'er a little higher then 2.9 at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Mag
With my test TCCD loves high drive strength. My LA's respond very well to high voltages and drive strength to (8).Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Mag
Maybe I'll bump my Drive Str to 8 and see what my 2x256MB 4400LE 431 does with some more powa. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by kakaroto
Changes the .0X voltage of vDIMM up .03-05v depending on PSU.Quote:
Originally Posted by higherøx
I find this useful because with it off I have 2.86v and when it's enabled I
get 2.90v, both of those actual voltages are with DRAM 2.8v selected in bios.
Anyway, after a long burn in my system seems to like the highest DRAM
strengths available + 2.96v. Over 3.1v is unstable for my TCCD.
I have some 440 TCCD and it boots into windows fine at 323 1:1 but only at 3.1 or 3.2v...Quote:
Originally Posted by kakaroto
If your LA like high voltages do you set the other drive setting to 2 or something else?
That's interesting... Thank you ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by TekXoID
I'm getting crazy 'cause I've got some 4800LA Samsung 440 too but they can't stabilize at 315, there's no way with 2.5 4-3-6 1T... DDR600 2.5 3-3-6 1T has no way too...Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Mag
Try decrease DQS Skew to 128 in the bios, and try lowering the drivestrength and see what happens in memtest86++ test 8. This methode works for me :)Quote:
Originally Posted by higherøx
Lowering DQS to 128 and disabling Bank Interleave gained me a fair bit of stability while I was working with my ram.
Thank you, but it's currently 255+, I would put 128+ or 128- ?
Thanks
Here's what I've been able to manage so far...haven't done a LOT of testing, just Everest and 1M runs:
http://img256.echo.cx/img256/6504/timings1rc.jpg
Well,
even though the Guide is quite helpful, my OCZ PL R2 are still bothering me (or maybe the DFI?) - I know those stix do ~275 @ 2,5-3-3-5 1T and I know for sure that it ain't the iMC....but WIndows refuses to boot at any setting >250 with those TCCDs.
I tried 310-P, 414-3, 515-2, and 515-3... memtest says "Dude - everything's fine" - but windows doesn't..
Any ideas - I tried just abouzt every hint from the Guide :stick:
Usually You need to give some more voltages to get the sticks stable in windows. I had the same problem: no errors in memtest or even goldmemory and i coldn't pass SuperPi at 1M. Raising voltage from 2,7V to 2,8V worked fine for me to get stability in windows at 550MHz.
please I need some help with DFI nf4 Sli-D and my couple of ADATA Vitesta 600 512mb Pc4800 RAM. I used them with a MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum at 255 mhz @ 2,5-3-3-11 1T @2,8v without a single problem. Now on this DFI with bios 310, Adata Vitesta 600 seems to work only @ 2T!!! Infact if I set 1T I cannot install windowsXp at all (I get a BSOD PFN_LIST_CORRUPT just after inst files have been copied onto hdd). Using onboard MemTest+ I realized that @ 1T I cannot pass test 8 (it produces hundreds of error!!!). I tried to switch Ram on the orange (2-4) slots. Now I am totally stable (S&M and Prime95) @ 260x10 1:1 (with a 3500+Venice@1,47v) with 3-3-3-7 2T 2,7v. I tried increasing voltage up to 2,85 but I continue to get errors if I set 1T. I am going to cool my Ram since it's definitely much hotter than on MSI (that's weird since it's working @ 2,7v vs 2,8 I had on MSI). Now I would like to know:
1. can you give me any suggestion to get 1T with my Vitesta 600?
2. I flashed bios 510-3 and 510-1 because I read on other forums 510-3 is for TCCD while -1 is generic. Here I learned that 510-2 is for TCCD, can you confirm this? Anyway with 510 I was able to get 1T @ 260 only setting 3-5-5-11 passing MemTest+ but definitely smashing performance into thousands of pieces....My PSU is an Enermax Noisetaker 600W v2.0, if this can help.
Thank you very much for any reply
Can someone direct me to where i can get a copy of A64Tweaker v.060?? The newest version thanks.
I cant find it anywhere!
CodeRed's WPCREDIT tweaks for the A64 ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by eclypse
THANK YOU! Ahh.. much better now :)
Damn fast!
I got a free day to play and needed that to help get started as i never got around to maxin out the ram timings.
Thx again ;)
I'm with a problem that seems not to be my memory.
Just look.
I run at 300HTT 1:1 and I'd like to get my memory running at 305 or 310MHz.
300MHz I run at 2.7v (3.3v off) 100% stable (memtest, games, superpi32mb)
Then I tried 305 at 2.8v (3.3v on and 3.3v off) and get errors in the second loop of superpi32mb o.O
Yesterday I put 6.5 × 305 (CPU/7 = 283MHz) and got erros too o.O
Raising LDT Voltage to 1.3v didn't help too.
The processor is not the problem (with mult 6x it's "stock") I think my memory is not the problem too, it should be something with HTT.
Tomorrow or Thursday my new Venice will come for me.
LBBLE 0515
[]'s
Many many thanks for a great article.
I printed the whole thread and did everything you said and woohoo I got 300 memtest86+ stable (both tests 8 & 5, btw, test8 ran fine when 5 failed had to increase the vddr a bit).
a little teaser:
http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a22/t0m4s/DSCN4934.jpg
Btw, I'm using PQI PC3200 Turbo (TCCD ofcourse), very pleased with the results. great ram.
Thanks again man.
:toast:
Anyone?Quote:
Originally Posted by arrarro71