theres alot of names on that stable list but I dont see any 8 hours of y-cruncher screenshots:confused:
Printable View
theres alot of names on that stable list but I dont see any 8 hours of y-cruncher screenshots:confused:
Titan, the stability policy wasn't defined until May 1st. Some people submitted before that claiming stability in various ways. You'll notice that entries made afterward show up on the untested table even if the author marked it stable.
Ive been running Y cruncher on my 1055t 3.9ghz @ 1.488 volts for the past hour. and i want to play games lol. but its been stable so far. Why specifically 8 hours? Ill do it for another 1 hour then im done haha
I'd recommend you run it overnight some time instead of during the day. Just start it up and go to sleep. Easy way to do it without disrupting you.
I chose eight hours as a compromise between too-short-to-tell-much and pretty-darn-confident. I've seen CPUs do Prime for 24 hours for instance and then still prove unstable. Run it again and after 30 hours it might finally show an error. That's all it takes of course. A couple of hours just doesn't do much in the way of establishing a confident measure of stability.
http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/9...tstable.th.jpg
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
There you go, i got tired of running it, I started around 4:12pm
But see what happened on the 8th hour when it was almost over...
So, I guess this lowered vCore is not really enough.
http://j.imagehost.org/t/0792/y-crun...l-8th-hour.jpg
Strange...now the power saving functions are off...and I didn't change anything further, lol.
So 8hours of y-cruncher fixes the problem :D
PS: The problem with instability probably is the memory failing memtest. It was passing fine superPi 32M and I skipped the memtest this time (a big mistake).
It was either the voltage, or the frequency, because the mobo is "overclocking" a little and the HT Ref clock is going higher with ~1MHz some time (fluctuation).
nice!, sorry to see that it crashed.
so do these processors just run cooler? My phenom II x4 955 ran hotter than this on the same cooler, or is the temp sensor off? i dont get it. My cores maxed out at 48C on a xigmatek HDT 1283, Although I am putting less volts through it.
in the next few days I will run it over night. I have been having trouble sleeping, so i stay up on the comp. Probably its the problem lol. But I will run it over night for 8 hours at 3.9ghz and then ill go for 4ghz.
Nope, they aren't, or at least mine. Volts to volts the X6 is hotter than X4 (2 extra cores). Watch the cpu temperature (not the cores) and add 6 - 10 degrees over it for the cores (not very sure how much for Thuban, but the difference for my Deneb was about 6 degrees). It's with the same cooling, however it's warmer outside.
BTW, I see Prime Blend and LinX produce more heat than y-cruncher...
My 1055T at 3.5 is slightly cooler or right around the same temp than my 720 at 3.3. I will be selling my old 720 to a friend for $50. This friend also just happened to give up on his AM2+ and sell it. Hes finally going to make a move to AM3 and stop using his frustratingly touchy mobo.
Infra, if you're stable under load but not when you're not even though you have CnQ & turbo disabled, you likely need to edit your P-tables. That was something I noticed on my board--even if I had everything disabled and set it to 4GHz at say 1.5V, when idle it would drop to another P-state and give less voltage even at the same frequency. In my case, it was dropping to like 1.45V. I started using K10Stat to manually set all the P-states to the same voltage and multiplier and then that quit happening.
Does K10Stat work with X6 processors now?
Seems to. I've used it successfully.
Yes, thanks. I thought about the same variant with k10stat, will try it :)
Played Bad Company 2 tonight for a couple of hours on 5850 OC crossfire and Thuban at 4.55 GHz using 10 pounds of dry ice to keep it stable. :D The game really smooths out around that frequency, though it seems to want more CPU speed.
nobody here with a thuban has ddr2 mem? i cant be the only one on am2+?
I took this screen about 18hrs into WCG. Idle was actually 28, I opened core temp after WCG was running.
http://3800z24.info/Phenom/MSI890GX/...able-18hrs.jpg
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1015DPMW
CPU Frequency: 4050 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.475V
CPU Multiplier: 14x CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 2700 MHz
CPU NB vCore: 1.35V
HT Ref Speed: 300 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3-16000
RAM Timings: 8-8-8-24-2T
RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
Motherboard: MSI 890GX-G65
Chipset/Socket: 890GX + SB850, AM3
Cooling: Air (Freezer 7 Pro)
Temps: 28C Idle / 44C Load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
Son of a... I just ran prime Small FFT for 4 hours last night to get it stable (enough for me) at 3500mhz... and then I checked the OP to see what stuff I needed to collect from BIOS to make an entry.
Any of those WUs come back as invalid? If you'd check for me, I'll consider this good.Quote:
Originally Posted by charged3800z24
I'm really impressed by this old M4A79T Deluxe. No problem with HT Ref so far even at 325 MHz.
hmm, need to learn how to do this lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
M4A79T is not so old :)...one year only
hehe :DQuote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
On your WCG status page, go to the Results Status menu item along the left and check out Valid vs Invalid vs Error vs Pending Validation results. If the units you crunched are still pending, you'll need to wait. If the units you crunched that day show up as all valid then we're golden.Quote:
Originally Posted by charged3800z24
Not a single person with DDR2? :( I really want to grab a 1055T but I don't want to spend $200 to be a guinea pig.
Here's one from another thread :Quote:
Originally Posted by afireinside
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...4&postcount=84
I also think that memel has some runs in a ddrII board, if remember correct and not getting old....:p:
The download site for y-cruncher went down today. Hostmonster terminated the contract after some crap over TOS.
The temporary download link is (removed).
EDIT:
The site is back online on a new host, but it's still awaiting DNS propagation before it will activate.
(removed)
EDIT 2:
Looks like it's back online. (At least for me.)
I don't know how long it will take for me to get the site back up on a new host. So for now, this will have to do.
I am using a 1090T with DDR2 but I am not near a final overclock yet so I didn't want to post before that point. As far as stability testing I did 3.8GHz last night with a two hour Prime95 25.11 - Blend test:
http://societaleclipse.net/images/Ot...B%202.6GHz.jpg
Tonight I tried the same test at 4.0GHz and slightly higher voltage (~1.425v? core, 1.185v CPU-NB) and the system shutdown within a minute. The same motherboard and PSU were able to Prime my 940BE at 1.52v core and 1.47v CPU-NB for comparison.
If you're just looking for numbers with DDR2 I've benched 4.0GHz with 3DMark06, WPrime, 7-Zip, Cinebench 11.5, and Everest 5.50 so far.
Very nice DEC..thank you for your post...:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by DedEmbryonicCe1
2600NB with 1.185 could be your stability problem ? Maybe 1.2 could do the trick for you. What ram is that u r using?
Is it ok for you to post the rest benches you mentioned? :)
whats the upper limit of voltage you want to give the CPUNB? 1.4?1.5?
1.5'ish on air, but usually the scaling is gone long before that.Quote:
Originally Posted by zaraza
CPU 4.1GHz - 1.424v
CPU-NB 2.6GHz - 1.185v
3DMark06 - CPU Score 7142
http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...GHzNB26GHz.jpg
7-ZIP - Compressing 19967 MIPS / Decompressing 24744 MIPS / Overall 22356 MIPS
http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...GHzNB26GHz.jpg
Cinebench 11.5 64bit - 7.29pts
http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...26GHzcropp.jpg
CPU-Z has the correct speed. Cinebench displays my boot speed even after I've changed it with AOD. The earlier 6.91 score was at 4.0GHz.
WPrime 2.03 - 32M: 7.083s / 1024M: 206.545s
http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...GHz26GHzNB.jpg
This one was a little odd because going from 3.8GHz - 4.1GHz I didn't notice a change in the 32M time here, only the 1024M score improved noticeably (222.925s @3.8GHz / 2.6GHz NB).
Everest 5.50 - See Below
http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...r/cachemem.png
As for Everest I can run the full suite at 4.0GHz and below but 4.1GHz isn't working out. I tried bumping vCore to 1.456v and CPU-NB to 1.26v using the smallest increments in AOD, and testing each along the way. When that didn't work I skipped ahead to a vCore of 1.504v and still the system shuts down during the same test - FPU Julia. During this test my Kill-A-Watt reports a jump to 414-415 Watts right before the crash. It looks like I'll need a stronger PSU or motherboard to eliminate variables. My mosfets are barely warm as they have lapped Enzotech/Swiftech forged copper heatsinks epoxied on with Arctic Alumina thermal adhesive plus a 1400rpm 120mm fan blowing on them. I want to believe they would at least get hot before they cause any problems so I'm leaning towards it being the PSU. I went back to the BIOS and disabled one core to see if that would work but unfortunately Everest just skips a lot of the CPU tests with my X5.:rolleyes:
new CPU for the list :)
- CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
- CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1011MPMW
- CPU Frequency: 4015 MHz
- CPU vCore: 1.38 - 1.392V
- CPU Multiplier: 20x
- CPU Turbo: Disabled
- CPU NB Speed: 3011 MHz
- HT Ref Speed: 200 MHz
- RAM Speed: DDR3-1606
- RAM Timings: 8-9-8-24-1T
- RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
- RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
- Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
- Chipset/Socket: 890FX + SB850, AM3
- Cooling: Water (Heatkiller 3.0)
- Temps: 26C Idle / 41C Load
- Operating System: Windows 7
- 32/64-Bit: 64
- Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
http://www.abload.de/thumb/4ghzdc23.png
Excellent DedEmbryonicCel, thank you for all info!!!! :up:
I think I'm going to change how the chart is done and just have one chart with color-coded rows based on "stability quotient". Basically, it'll be how many hours or minutes or something of some stability test have been performed. Very few people (nobody) seem interested in doing what I would consider a meaningful amount of stability testing. Any thoughts?
Yes I have a thought.........for one, how about removing the people who havent shown the stability requirement until they do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
Also, lower the stability requirement to 4 hours instead of 8. 8 hours is to long especially if you want to play a game during the day. which brings up another point, when I run a stability program,( Ive done a few 6 hour runs of prime) and I personally like to be there monitoring now and then so if something happens I can go into the bios and check on settings. Running 8 hours of stability while you sleep only to wake up to a rebooted PC or one that might not even turn on is not a fun thing people want to do to get on a list.
These are just my thoughts and I was actually going to do the 8 hours of Y-cruncher.....but Im still testing settings and havent really gotten to the stability part yet.
people are still trying to figure out their stable settings, plus alot of people still dont have the cpu yet.
Maybe it's a good idea, but 20 - 30 min of LinX or Prime doesn't mean anything. It's very very basic, so you know that it's possible to make it full stable at some point with more tweaking.
Well, it could be full stable at that settings, but you didn't check, right? I ran 50 min Prime Blend stable at 4.3GHz with 1.45V, but then one of the cores gave an error, so...it's not stable.
2-3 hours is much better than nothing, though. As you saw, I ran y-cruncher for almost 8 hours when it failed... I'm willing to run it overnight, but I have no time atm to do tweaking.
Will try again next couple of days.
PS: totally agree with Titan...I ran y-cruncher overnight and when I got up I saw that it was still running, but it failed after some time :) I also want to be near the pc to make corrections in the bios if needed.
anyone care run coredamage for me I want just want to see the max cpu temperature ?
Hmm... those MPMW's look might good. Requiring lower voltage to go beyond 4.2.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chri$ch
I think, as said Chew, 3h prime its OK for most users.
http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/3...able8hours.png
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
there we go 8 hours stabl
Looking good there, zaraza! I've updated you on the list. What are your new RAM timings and frequency so that I may update that too?
Ram timings havn't changed they should be
8-8-8-20. Frequency is 1524.
Im going to try for 4ghz
my NB is 1.38v my CPUNB is 1.325 ( i feel that my CPUNB is far too high but who knows)
I dunno if I got a bad chip or it's some bug with the mobo. But, i'm running the 1055t on a gigabyte 890gpa-ud3h realtemp says my stock VID is 1.4250 and in BIOS it's the same. So far I passed 20 passes of LinX with 14x multi, 286 Mhz bus speed, 1.55 vcore, 1.36 NB Vcore, 2.20v CPU PLL, 2288 NB Freq and 2002 HT Link. Ram is 9-9-9-24 1.65 @ 1525 Mhz. Everything else on auto. Currently working on Prime though. Should I head back to Frys looking for another chip?
If it can do 4GHz at 1.55V, I'd say you're fine. If you're asking if I think you should buy a second one, that's up to you. Personally, with a result like yours I'd probably just run with it. If you're asking if I think you should exchange it for a different one, absolutely not. That would be unethical to exchange it because it won't overclock enough when it is functional at stock.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BETA.
I believe my CPU PLL is set at 2.5v stock. Maybe its your PLL voltage thats holding you back.
I am thinking it that it is my board holding me back and causing random crashes at 4ghz. I really do. But theres nothing i can do, im not gonna return the board.
Well, it just passed it's 7th hour of prime, small fft's, and once it passes through the 10th hour i'm gonna call it "stable enough". After that, i'll start to tinker with other settings to see if I can lower the VcoreQuote:
Originally Posted by Particle
I have read many OC guides across many enthusiast forums around the net via google search, lol and many of these guides actually say to lower CPU PLL in some cases. It worked for me with my Intel i7 rig, so I just tried pulling the PLL with this one. I'm a noob at AMD OCing, so I could be totally wrong on doing this.Quote:
Originally Posted by zaraza
Go ahead and set it to 2.5 as well as your CPUNB to 1.25-1.3. Then boot into windows and check stability.Quote:
Originally Posted by BETA.
According to the numbers this one must be very good:
yes, u got this today?
Reporting back in. My 1055t did Prime95 stable 10 and a half hours with 1.55v/1.57v. LinX, full memory 20 pass test as well, but forgot to do a screenie.
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/7238/1055toc1.th.png
I am going to try this with a much lower Vcore. i'll report back if there's good results.Quote:
Originally Posted by zaraza
1.57V for just 4G? That's insane.
good temps for the volts though :p: ive been helping him a lil through pm so hes starting to get it figured out.. id guess he'll get 4ghz stable somewhere around 1.5-1.52v :shrug:
did we find out if amd overdrive let you use the higher multis for 1055T? if so that might help out BETA with using a much lower cpu voltage.
Id bet depending on the mobo it might be getting overvolted automatically through the mobo. If I set my voltage to lets say 1.4v I might see up to 1.45v if running prime. He should go over the voltages again my 1090T can do prime at 1.4v 4ghz.......didnt let it run for long but its just an example.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
Ill post a pic in a minute im on my laptop now.
here cpu at 4ghz nb at 2800
http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...4ghzthuban.png
setting my voltage to 1.57v for 4.2ghz and the nb at 3ghz look what the mobo does
http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...tan771/1-1.png
- CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
- CPU Stepping: have to check but certain about week 15
- CPU Frequency: 4100 MHz
- CPU vCore: 1.475V
- CPU Multiplier: 20.5x
- CPU Turbo: Disabled
- CPU NB Speed: 2800 MHz
- HT Ref Speed: 200 MHz
- RAM Speed: DDR2-1066
- RAM Timings: 5-5-5-15-2T
- RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
- RAM vDIMM: 2.00V
- Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P
- Chipset/Socket: 790X + SB750, AM3
- Cooling: Air (Noctua NH-D14)
- Temps: 19C Idle / 40C Load
- Operating System: Windows 7
- 32/64-Bit: 64
- Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
Ambient temp is 21 degrees Celcius, so I don't believe the temperature the CPU is reporting.
This is all in a closed Lian-Li PC-A05N with an UltraKaze 2000 as intake powered by the CPU fan header. The fan runs 1100RPM idle and around 1700RPM under full load.
http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/3...ckedx62.th.jpg
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
CPU Stepping: 1012DPMW serial 005
CPU Frequency: 4113 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.4V in bios 1.404V in windows -- 1.44V load LLC enabled
CPU Multiplier: 20x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 3085 MHz
HT Ref Speed: 205.7 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3 DDR1644
RAM Timings: 6-6-5-15 1TT
RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
RAM vDIMM: 1.63V
Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula bios 0801
Chipset/Socket: 890X + SB850, AM3
Cooling: Watercooling Heatkiller 3.0
Temps: 16ºC Idle / 30ºC Load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable 40 mins Prime blend
Ambient temp: 21ºC
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...me4100crop.png
40mins may not be that long but it sure is good enough for me. ;)
got mine today ...
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4193009/1055t_stepping.jpg
hopefully a 4ghz chip as well.
Good luck biohead!!! Post your results when you can.
Hey guys, looking for some insight with this issue I am having with my 1090T, taken from my cinebench benchmarking post...
Not sure why CPUZ has my clock speed/voltage fluctuating since I have C1E, Q&Q and CPB disabled in the bios? This appears to be an issue with the new asus bios, great.
Update: No matter what I set my cpu voltage to in the bios, it won't reflect the same bios voltage in cpuz or AOD. BIOS says 1.4V and AOD says 1.325...
To run at 4.0ghz I need to set 1.40V in AOD...
Hopefully Asus releases a fix for this.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1273339714
still waiting for that OCZ kit to arrive, got it from the FS section. so somewhere next week.Quote:
Originally Posted by informal
Ran all night (8 hours) at 4004 MHz on this 1055T. I had to set it to 1.55V. Lame. Turns out my board droops to around 1.51V under load, so no wonder I was crashing with lower voltage set.
On a side-note, here's a shot from my last DI run. This is the speed I played BC2 at, though voltage was higher I think.
http://pcrpg.org/pics/computer/thuban_4550_cpuz.png
Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
Nice Prime.. that Dice OC @ 4500mhz and able to game cool...
Vdroop suc_ks Bal_s with Numerouse Mobos(ASUS inparticular) ,, If you Use Higher NBvid say above 1.35v (depends on NB freqency ) it will sometimes let you use a Lower Vcore For Prime. Seeing the IMC is what Hogs some juice once Prime kicks in the Heat.
Also look for a setting Like (VDD volts) in Bios... usually Runs @ 1.22v or Auto something like that .. Raising this to around 1.28v can keep the Vdroop more minamal.
The CPU Divider.. Sometimes a Higher or Lower Divider will have less stress on IMC = less load on same Voltage settings.
Its funny how a new chip makes everything New Again:D
http://3800z24.info/Phenom/1090T/WCG-stable-4ghz.jpg
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
CPU Stepping: ( I will get this tomorrow )
CPU Frequency: 4000 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.45V
CPU Multiplier: 20x CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 2600 MHz
CPU NB vCore: 1.2V
HT Ref Speed: 200 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3-16000
RAM Timings: 8-8-8-24-2T
RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV
Chipset/Socket: 890FX + SB850, AM3
Cooling: Water
Temps: 28C Idle / 40C Load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
WCG stable 14hrs+ (all I could fit on the screen). All were succes.
Particle -- I will reserve this spot, and update with full info soon with CPUID and screen shots. Please wait to put your info in your official chart until I have the final, highest stable clock -- right now all I have done is very very simple. (EDIT: 1.45 V was not really stable, 1.50 V appears to be -- in terms of stable I am quoting Prime95 will test with Y-cruncher before I update the final report), EDIT2: Stable at 1.525 V requested in BIOS, 1.481 V at load. Prime 95 and Y-Chruncher 8 hour passed, Y-cruncher screenshot below.
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE
CPU Stepping: PH-E0 / CCBBE CB 1012APMW
CPU Frequency: 4000 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.525V (VID) / 1.481 V (Actual)
CPU Multiplier: 20x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 2000 MHz
HT Ref Speed: 200 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3-1333
RAM Timings: 9-9-9-24-2T
RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
RAM vDIMM: 1.60V
Motherboard: ASUS M4A79T Deluxe
Chipset/Socket: 790FX + SB750, AM3
Cooling: Air (Zalman 9700)
Temps: 17.5 C Idle / 47.5 C Load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/8750/4gstable.th.jpg
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Particle, why is your HT Link so low? Maybe that's causing instability?
Hey all just reporting back in. I sold my previous 1015 batch chip on craigslist and was lucky enough to get a buyer within 2 hours of my posting. As some of you may already know, that chip took 1.57v to do 4 ghz. I got a lil guidance from crazydiamond but sadly this chip just wasn't having anything else. Anyways, after I sold the 1015 batch, I called up Fry's and spoke to the cage guy and he confirmed that the other batches they had were 1008's and 1010's, I went with the 1010. got home and popped the chip in and the stock VID is 1.3000v. Pretty good, I think? Waaaay better than the 1.425 chip atleast.
Anyways I managed to do 4.0ghz with 1.47v/1.49v prime95, small FFT's 10 hour stable and LinX full memory load, 20 passes. 286 bus speed, 14x multi with 8x on the NB and HT Link. 1.2v on the cpu nb, 1.2 NB everything else on auto.
I just wanted to update my situation, sadly though i forgot to take screenies of my 10 hr prime and 20 pass linx, but I got 3 hours of blend.
http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/2...5t10101.th.png
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
hi all i'm italian sry for my english.
now i have crosshair iii and 965 and 5970 sapphire. i use pc only for gaming. what do u think? i need to sell ch3 and 965 and buy ch4 and 1090t? it's better? i use pc with noctua nh-d14 and now i have 965 at 4000@.1475 - with 1090t i can overclock more? also 4200-4300 air mode? it's better for game? thx to all!
If you're only gaming your current system is fine.
hey richierich, i see that you're running a mugen 2 with two gentle typhoons, which is exactly what i'm gonna do. good combo, right?
i've already taped the short sides of the mugen 2 to eliminate airflow leakage for push-pull. i figured that would increase air pressure somewhat. thoughts?
How did you tape them? I figured that the typhoons were already good enough that I didn't have to do any kind of taping.
transparant tape on both short sides. and it's not like the fans itself aren't good enough, it's just that i think this could increase performance a little. i'd like the air to go straight through rather than escape from the sides.Quote:
Originally Posted by richierich
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4193009/DSC00303.jpg
Oh I see now. I want to see your temps once you get your system setup.
Charts updated.
I try to keep it around 1GHz or so. Considering how unimportant HT link speed is, there really isn't any reason to push it. 800-1200 MHz is fine.Quote:
Originally Posted by richierich
So what's the story on stability? I ran prime95 for almost 5 hours for mine at 3800mhz and it was fine.
I also have an unstable/untested 4004mhz validation if you want that for the charts.
hey, glad some one is testing on this mobo :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by r.p
what bios are you using?
howz the OC going? good job so far. looking to get a 1055t at 4ghz, i have a xigamatek s-1283
I have that same heatsink - the HDT-S1283 - and it seems to cope okay. I'm having temp issues (60c prime loads) in a 20c ambient room at 3.8ghz and 1.38v.
* CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
* CPU Stepping:
* CPU Frequency: 3900 MHz
* CPU vCore: 1.49375V
* CPU Multiplier: 19.5x
* CPU Turbo: Disabled
* CPU NB Speed: 3000 MHz
* HT Ref Speed: 200 MHz
* RAM Speed: DDR3-1600
* RAM Timings: 9-9-9-24-1T
* RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
* RAM vDIMM: 1.50V
* Motherboard: ASUS M4A785TD-V EVO
* Chipset/Socket: 785GX + SB710, AM3
* Cooling: Cooler Master Hyper 212+
* Temps: 24c idle/54c load
* Operating System: Windows 7
* 32/64-Bit: 64
* Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
^ I'll need some kind of image or other suitable proof before marking it stable. You've been added to the list, however.
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1175312
* CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
* CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1013 CDPW (I think)
* CPU Frequency: 4004 MHz
* CPU vCore: 1.4V
* CPU Multiplier: 14x
* CPU Turbo: Disabled
* CPU NB Speed: 2288 MHz
* HT Ref Speed: 286 MHz
* RAM Speed: DDR3-1451
* RAM Timings: 9-9-9-24-1T
* RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
* RAM vDIMM: 1.70V
* Motherboard: MSI 890GXM-G65
* Chipset/Socket: 890GX + SB850, AM3
* Cooling: Xigmatek HDT-S1283 + Yate Loon Medium
* Temps: 33c idle/54c load
* Operating System: Windows 7
* 32/64-Bit: 64
* Stable/Suicide/Untested: Unstable/Suicide?
Are you going to add my entry as well? I would like to think that my 8 hour y-crunch session was of some use ;).
Added you both. I'm sorry about that Dennet--I had missed your post a couple of pages back but you're on the charts now.
just a quick question, has anyone here got there hands on a 95w 1055t yet?
i noticed they are listed on asus site under cpu support, maybe they are just OEM but ive seen one or 2 places listing them.
HDT55TWFK6DGR
PRAZ
Nice OC on that 6.
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
CPU Stepping: camera was dead did not write it down...will update when chip gets pulled out next
CPU Frequency: 4571 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.575V
CPU Multiplier: 20.5x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 2900 MHz
HT Ref Speed: 223 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3-1784
RAM Timings: 7-8-7-21-1T
RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
RAM vDIMM: 1.700V
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair III Formula
Chipset/Socket: 790FX + SB750, AM3
Cooling: Coolermaster V10 with 4 total fans
Temps: 35C idle (cnc) 57C load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Untested
http://img.techpowerup.org/100511/15210pi4571.png
cdwall: cool, think, its 1015 batch?
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1013 CPAW
CPU Frequency: 4215 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.525V
CPU Multiplier: 21x
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 3010 MHz
HT Ref Speed: 200 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3-1600
RAM Timings: 7-7-7-20-1T
RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
RAM vDIMM: 1.7V
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
Chipset/Socket: 890FX + SB850, AM3
Cooling: Watercooled
Temps: 52c load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
12 hours prime95
http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...hoursprime.png
I think its a 1013 I got it on neweggs release day.Quote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
My 4ghz+ requires like 1.525 or more volts... I dont know if i want to push that high.
Charts updated. Praz, I can't mark you as stable without an 8+ hour stability test. 40 minutes of LinX is insufficient.
---
I find it interesting that we're all using 64-bit. I've seen not a single 32-bit submission. I like that trend. :)
No problem. Remove my entries from the charts. Thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
Edit: Thanks for removing my entries. This is your game and we need to play by your rules and I respect that. However, 20 passes of LinX combined with 6 instance of MemTest For Windows (500% coverage minimum), 45 loops of both FarCry2 and Warhead along with all the other benches I normally post show me more for stability then 8 hours of Prime ever will.
these chips clock differently than the old C1/2/3 chips from phenoms past. i have never had one respond this well to added voltage and they dont seem to have a wall like even the latest C3 chips did. i honestly think i could get mine to push over 4.6-4.7ghz suicide if i can get the air cool enough. my phase should push it to 5ghz easy will post those benchmarks as they come in. great scoreboards BTW very clean looking unluckily my droid hates them :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
5Ghz under single stage phase will be hard to achieve, especially with monster heat load on this 1090T @ >1.6Vcore
it doesnt put out anymore heat than a X4 did with the same vcore...its only 400mhz more for me even on a suicide it should handle that :cry: dont tell me it wont do itQuote:
Originally Posted by Dumo
I didn't know you'd done all of that. I just saw a LinX shot showing 45 minutes. I'll happily accept those qualifications if you want to go back up on the chart. Please excuse me as I know I may seem the villain at times--I just want to make sure that "stable" on the chart is a reliable reference. A lot of people (not necessarily you) will claim stability if they merely manage to load Windows. It's my hope to provide a bit more statistical validity than that so that a person may look at the chart and get a real idea where their chances lie.Quote:
Originally Posted by Praz
I'm glad you like them. I actually took the time to write some software that generates generic charts like that with this (and a few other) projects in mind. It's dynamic and auto-sizing which makes it nice. I also wrote some custom management software for the charts that generates images in batch and uploads them to the website. That's why chart updates are so responsive. I just edit values and click a button to make this thread up to date. It's much less work than maintainers in the past have had to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by cdawall
Particle, you should change the unstable list to a suicide list, youll get alot more hits also for that than the stable list............plus its more fun:)
heres mine if you change your mind
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1013 CPAW
CPU Frequency: 4656 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.68V
CPU Multiplier: 19.5
CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed:
HT Ref Speed: 238 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3-1600
RAM Timings: 7-7-7-20-1T
RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
RAM vDIMM: 1.7V
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
Chipset/Socket: 890FX + SB850, AM3
Cooling: Watercooled
Temps: 27c load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...validation.png
a little OT but relating to dumo/cdawalls posts.. ive heard a lot of people talk about the heat these put out but i was always under the impression that 1.5v will put out the same watts/heat whether its 1.5v on 4 cores or 1.5v on 6 cores :shrug: ive seen chew & now dumo say things that imply otherwise and im just not sure. can someone clear this up? thanks
Well Dumo and chew have taken actual temp readings with a temp probe I believe, so I would believe those guys over the BIOS.
http://3800z24.info/Phenom/CrossHair...55t-Stable.jpg
CPU Model: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
CPU Stepping: CCBBE CB 1015DPMW
CPU Frequency: 4063 MHz
CPU vCore: 1.475V
CPU Multiplier: 13.5x CPU Turbo: Disabled
CPU NB Speed: 2400 MHz
CPU NB vCore: auto
HT Ref Speed: 300 MHz
RAM Speed: DDR3-16000
RAM Timings: 8-8-8-24-2T
RAM Configuration: 2 x 2GB
RAM vDIMM: 1.65V
Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV
Chipset/Socket: 890fX + SB850, AM3
Cooling: Water, non chilled
Temps: 22C Idle / 41C Load
Operating System: Windows 7
32/64-Bit: 64
Stable/Suicide/Untested: Stable
Im under the impression that each core would get 1.5v? But im not sure......I figured thats the reason I had increased heat going from 6400x2 to x4 at the same voltage:shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by crazydiamond