Err... The fins cool the pipes. ;)
Printable View
This thing uses an EM pump, right?
This is right around the corner,
http://eprim.org/category/cooling/
can't this be done with some kinda Oil ? (expamle canola oil) be much cheaper.
Talk about being ahead of there time, check out these links to the company that made that gallium liquid xeon loop on our tax dollars.
http://www.techpowerup.com/?3105
http://www.its.org/node/5319
Haha, Tardbus is already doing Liquid Gallium cooling here: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=99240
this isn't really a pump though. :/
"An electromagnetic pump has several advantages over typical mechanical pump designs. It contains no moving parts, shafts, seals, etc., emits no noise or vibration, has unlimited MTBF and suffers no performance degrading over time"
it's moving by heat.
No, that would be convection.
Neither does this use a traditional electromagnetic pump. Or at least, if it does it's lying about the 'moving parts' thing. a traditional electromagnetic pump manipulates a piston using a solenoid type em field. a typical em pump has a cycle of 50hz, which is why i say flow rates here could be incredible.
but for this application an actual EM pump in the traditional sense would be useles. An EM pump could be used in any fluid application, but the danamics lm10 happens to be moving liquid metal.
-SOLENOID-
Soviet Russia used liquid metals to transfer heat from their submarine nuclear reactors. It did not go so well. Hopefully these guys have learned from their mistakes.
PS: This comment was meant to be funny. If you do not have a background in Cold War Soviet Nuclear Reactor design then this joke has probably been lost on you. Use Google and learn.
Well, if you had a ferromagnetic coolant, you could pump it by alternating the field on a couple electromagnets. Much like a Japanese bullet train can be moved by rapidly alternating, albeit static, electromagnets.
Also,
This explains everything about the failed Soviet liquid metal cooled-reactor scheme.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
set price of unit is 280 euro...rip off
( http://translate.google.fr/translate...-8&sl=fr&tl=en )
$399 usd.
Well, it is technically a double pass radiator. Now we have to see if it is capable of dissipating as much heat as a 120.3 or something..
ROFL ROFL ROFL
at the RRP :rolleyes:
That's the thing - I'm pretty sure it's been incontrovertibly shown that it could not be better, or really even somewhat similar.
What it boils down to: There is only one fan removing heat and has a limited amount of surface area. We've gone into more detail on the ability of the pump elsewhere, but the previous sentence is going to be a huge reason why this couldn't be better than water cooling.
WOW at that price.
omg SO unconfirmed.
keep your panties on.
It seems like every year or so a company announces this but i have never even seen a working sample.
Guess that the "this cooler should kick ass." "is not true". :)
Honestly, with such a small surface area they need to do miracles to meet their claims about the performance. It's all lies, I say.
Yes???
It's another "revolutionary product" that's really just a refined version (if that) of something else a fraction of the price.
The price is revolutionary. At $100 it might have a chance if it actually does better than something like a TRUE. But for $400, I hope they are only hoping to trick the rich and businesses.
They are not looking to compete against TRUE, but water cooling.
I'm not sure I agree that a cooler that beats TRUE sucks, but yes the price is going to be a hinder, which they are also very well aware of.
//Andreas
Er, with a thermal conductivity that high, technically you don't NEED a lot of surface area if you can dissipate the heat from the fins fast enough. You'll just have to see how well it scales with airflow.
Don't go making absolute claims when you don't know how it performs. "Kick ass" or "suck" is so arrogant.
The liquid might even move slowly. If it gets time to heat up then it'll drop heat onto the fins as it goes up to the pump AND as it goes back down. This is in effect a double pass radiator.
I'm saying lets see if it even MATCHES the TRUE in performance. Then we'll start the "oh, this air cooler makes watercooling obsolete" stuff like happens from time to time.
For $400, does it cool my video card and northbridge too, and at lower temperatures? Until then, this is nonsense, unless you require convenience (well, and again, and if it performs well).
I would want some real data on this one before making any serious calls.
5-10*C would be watercooling territory. If they do it right, it should perform better than a TRUE. If it somehow does perform as well as a water setup, then really, why not just use the money for a water setup?
Less hastle maybe?
I guess I just can't forget that this thing is going to cost $400.
I wont be buying it
Id rather WC
Eh, almost everyone on here has massive amounts of disposable income, or they sure spend it like they do.
They might get customers.
uh,... dunno man... I dont like it when my HSF is cost me a lot more than my proccessor :D
It's the 17th and no reviews in sight :-(
However, when I look at their reseller list and visit those homepages, the resellers do advertise the cooler. Some of them also advertise a "danamics powerbooster for LM10 - Fits 3,5' drivebay, Gives the pump more power and better cooling performance"
Hmm, not bad but looks like there's not as much fins surface area as TRUE. Also, the fins are aluminum, and thicker. I wouldnt be surprised if it still loses to the copper edition of TRUE, with greater "air transfer" potential with say, a 2000 rpm fan.
It's like having a VF900 on your HD4870 and the fins get 90 degrees--the puny 80mm fan cannot get enough heat off those tiny fins.
Maybe I'm wrong and there's still enough surface area for the 120mm fan to keep this metal liquid beast from overheating?
We've had a prototype to test for a few days, but we may have to wait for the retail unit before posting the review. I'll try to keep you posted, otherwise you'll just have to check the frontpage at NH for updates. I don't have as much as I would like for XS anymore.
Either way, a review is coming very soon.
//Andreas
I couldnt see it being released at such a price no one would buy it IMO, you could buy a copper TRUE lap it washer mod it buy two fans and get great performance and buy a DICE/LN2 pot and DICE for a year for benching purposes and still cost less then this one cooler.
TRUE Copper-100 dollars
Sand Paper - 5 dollars
Glass-7 dollars
Washers-30 cents
Push Pull fans- 20 dollars
DICE/LN2 pot-130 dollars
Dice- 1.50 a pound 4 a month x12=72.00
Total=364 dollars
Beating peformance of a 400 dollar cooler priceless
if it competes with watercooling without the hassle of water running out to fry your comp, its viable.
I would get one so I could run my videocards passived cooled with water.
with that danamics cooler will there be a need for fan's as well? Seems like it might get a tad overpowered from our OC'd Quads at higher speed?
This cooler uses NaK as its coolant, no wonder they haven't got the green light to market it in the US.
I'm pretty sure NaK, if I'm reading it right, as in Sodium - Potassi(ate?) doesn't exist.
its a eutectic mix of sodium and potasium, about 78% potassium and 22% sodium. the stuff can explode if i comes into contact with water (or someone's skin) if it doesn't explode it will atleast burn.
Has anyone seen this in the wild yet? If so where and how much?
NordicHardware is testing this cooler atm, so review should be available soon.
http://www.nordichardware.com/news,8369.htmlQuote:
We've been testing a LM10 prototype for a few days now, but we still have some tweaking of the text to do before we reveal how it performs. In the meantime, Danamics has announced that cooler will become available in stores near you soon, if not already. The cooler currently support AM2, AM2+ and Socket 775, but buyers will get a free Socket 1366 mounting bracket for free.
The metal in question is NaK. I can confirm that. However it's hermetically sealed inside the pipes and if a leak would occur it would coagulate instantly and seal the leak. For this to be dangerous your actually need to bring out a saw, open up the pipe and drop it in a bucket of water. I sincerely hope no one is stupid enough to do that.
I'm not sure when the review will be up, we're still discussing the results from the prototype tests. We will have benchmarks with the retail as well, we're simply discussing the best way to do this. We've been testing with a slightly overclocked high-leakage Core QX9770 which is almost too much for TRUE120 and the results are interesting the least to say.
We want to include some other tests as well, partly on request, which will delay the article a bit.
Also, Core i7 mounting brackets are on their way and will be free of charge, incl. shipping.
//Andreas
Where to Buy Danamics LM10:
http://www.highflow.nl/index.php?tar...product_id=899
http://shop.burro-net.com/product_in...products_id=33
For the price .. fuggedaboutit!
Don't try to read between the lines, let the numbers do the talking.
We're waiting for the retail unit right now. Neither we nor Danamics wants to stress this so I'm not sure I can promise a review before the weekend.
//Andreas
I want to see the numbers too.
In my opinion if it beats the current best solution for air, TRUEcu, it will be by 2 or 3C max. I would say it is almost impossible for it be something crazy better then the TRUEcu, like 8 or 9C better. And, there is the possibility that it will not be as good as TRUEcu.
So, reviews are going to be interesting. And of course, we won't be able to thrust a single review. I for one, will only make my mind, after seeing consistent results on several reviews and users reviews and comparisons too.
Hm, if it performes as highend water, it might aply to some ppl becourse it is very compact, no?
high end water is very flexible and upgreadable
most ppl that are thinking of throwing that kind of money on cooling will also cool their GFX cards or NB etc
Minor update: Testing retail cooler, review should be up next week. Retail cooler is better than the prototype.
//Andreas
I am also really curious about it but I do not expect much, they need airflow and surface area to dissipate the heat regardless of what transports it to the fins heatpipes or this electromagnetic pump, on the other hand a noiseless pump for a new liquid cooling would really make me jump on it.
can you drop any hints? :)
Be patient and let him do his job!^^ :p:
His job is done, the cooler has been tested. He could have simply announced the results in the same time it took him to post about NOT releasing the results. He wants you to be impatient.
Please. We are talking about "is it better than TRUE or water or not"... which he gives a vague answer to. There's not much of a process in saying "it outperformed the TRUE by 10*C"... which is what everyone is waiting to hear.
He could do, but he clearly stated he would not. So lets show some respect to that man following his principles. I am also totally eager to seeing results here, but I am not a santa-believing child anymore (although I sometimes act like that in private ;) ) not being able to hold out, mate. :D
I have to respect the manufacturer here. I'm sorry, but I believe it will be for the best if all numbers are released at the same time. If I give you one number you're expectations are going to be based on this very number and color your views of the upcoming review. Besides, which number should I pick then? From the passive? the low-flow fan? the mid-flow fan? the high-flow fan? The difference will vary between test as the passive flow heatpipes and active flow metal will behave different in each test.
If you get all numbers at the same time you will get the honest chance of forming your own opinion without being colored by a number I had to choose for you.
I am sorry for the delay, even though I had nothing to with it and I can't stress it, I hope you bear with us here.
//Andreas
Could you let us know when will the NDA expire ?
lol there's no nda :D
you already can buy the thing.
Andreas just dont want to spill the beans on the partial results, cos it may distort the image of the product compared to full title
Never seen a cooler genearate as much hot air before :rofl:
and their beer :)Quote:
most ppl that are thinking of throwing that kind of money on cooling will also cool their GFX cards or NB etc
http://www.nordichardware.com/news,8407.htmlQuote:
Originally Posted by Andreas G
Too bad, I guess we have to wait a little longer...
Wasn't the whole idea that it was to be fanless? No moving parts?
for that price, it should perform same as liquid cooling.
cant wait for the review :(