Printable View
Nice clocks guys!
During a short time I had with my 1090T I needed 1.45V (vDropped from 1.5V set in AOD) to do Cinebench R10 x64 full test at 4GHz.
It is very new system so anything can be wrong, but I wont have a chance to find out till at least tomorrow late evening.
Keep testing these CPU's! Gives me better overview where to go with my settings :up:
My sweet spot for performance / power consumption:Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboDiv
http://richierich1212.smugmug.com/ph...5_QGVrz-X2.jpg
mine :D
vcore 1.41 @ Bios
http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/8...t290x14.th.jpg
Thank you @richierich. This looks awesome.
@barong, can you disable Turbo Boost ? Is the option available ?
yes it can, the turbo wont kick even if u only use 2 cores, i already tried i think it because my cnq
I haven't seen CnQ being able to be disabled yet, even if it has been disabled in BIOS.
Just high on linx? Why not max :P What were your temps like? Max stable OC?Quote:
Originally Posted by barong
Great! Then it is going to be fixed with an biosupdate :) My 1055T makes 3dmark vantage @ 4GHz with vcore 4 steps up from stock vcore. Just under 20k CPUscore.Quote:
Originally Posted by richierich
look, all 1010 series are good for OC..
I guess it's the first result with thuban on DDR2 reported so far.:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by memel
Quote:
Originally Posted by memel
what mem divider are you running memel?
cheers
So comparing i7 benchmark results with mine, and my system blows away theirs, yet their CPU score is still high. Can anyone explain why?:
Mine:
http://richierich1212.smugmug.com/ph...6_PCxHv-X2.jpg
Theirs:
http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/4659/passmark7new.png
@richierich
It's simple man,look at the different versions of the benchmark you used(6.1 in your case and 7 in theirs)...
Ok I'll try to run the latest one later today and see what happens.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vandiesel
memclock 667 5-5-5-15 @ ~980Mhz DDR2 (HTT294)
ok new PassMark 7.0:
http://richierich1212.smugmug.com/ph...3_QMsFa-X2.jpg
310 bus speed on a ud4p? what are your bios settings?Quote:
Originally Posted by richierich
What BIOS settings are you looking for?
Quote:
Originally Posted by richierich
ive just got a 1055t, on a ud5p , struggling to get it past 270 bus speed.
is your ud4p fxt or fxta?
Passmark looks to be mostly singlethreaded test by looking at those Thuban scores. There are a few subtests that support multicore,but overall not a test to use for multicore perf. evaluation.
The integer performance is where the score is taking the hit. It's half of the Intel (according to the benchmark anyway)...
Only XT. What voltages are you running?Quote:
Originally Posted by Balb0wa
Another sweet spot:
http://richierich1212.smugmug.com/ph...1_6HgUq-X2.jpg
could someone run a x264 benchmark with their OC please. i am thinking about an upgrade but want to see some results to compare too..
http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=520
Results for x264.exe r1342
--------------------------
encoded 1442 frames, 78.41 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 77.10 fps, 3900.68 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 77.75 fps, 3901.21 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 77.10 fps, 3901.23 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 25.21 fps, 3970.20 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 25.28 fps, 3970.63 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 25.30 fps, 3971.69 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 25.38 fps, 3970.42 kb/s
thx in advance :)
edit: oppps i just caught some numbers in this very thread... looks like a upgrade is at hand :)
Ok guys, I haven't dealt with an AMD setup in awhile and I am running into some issues. I have the Biostar TA785G3 and the 1055T. I replaced my 435 Triple Core with it after making sure I had the latest bios for 6 core support. First in the bios default CPU voltage shows 1.42v, sound right? Second, it will not boot into Windows, it keeps crashing, again this is at default settings. Any ideas?
Specs are:
1055T
Biostar TA785G3
2 x 1Gb Patriot DDR3 1333Mhz ram
Windows Home server
On Board GPU
I can stick my 435 back in and it boots fine, am I missing something here?
Thanks.