AMD Zambezi news, info, fans !

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

10-12-2011, 07:39 PM
charged3800z24

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Stilt

You mean power consumption when overclocked, right?

125W TDP models have 110W TDP for cores, 15W for the NB & external logic, while the readings for 95W TDP models are 80W for the cores and the same 15W for NB & external logic. So it ain´t that hot chip at stock.

Yeah, I know...
We are not at StockSystems.org thou.

OC'd, yes :p: , and yes we are on xtremesystem.org lol... Nice break down on wattage, I never new that.
10-12-2011, 07:42 PM
charged3800z24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spectrobozo

because is the fastest single GPU card?

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...0_7.html#sect1 HD6970

Would be nice to see since it is part of the AMD platform for FX CPUs
10-13-2011, 12:30 AM
SBB

Quote:

Originally Posted by charged3800z24

Can some one find a review site that used a 6970 and or 6990? Why is everyone using the nVidia 580?

"DGLee" on here did his review with 6990 CFX :D

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...iew-(1)-Gaming
10-13-2011, 12:40 AM
FlanK3r

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Stilt

You mean power consumption when overclocked, right?

125W TDP models have 110W TDP for cores, 15W for the NB & external logic, while the readings for 95W TDP models are 80W for the cores and the same 15W for NB & external logic. So it ain´t that hot chip at stock.

Yeah, I know...
We are not at StockSystems.org thou.

I will be mad man for FX... 24/7 1.525V at CPU, 1.3V at CPU-NB :)...power consumption, tooo much :).

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazydiamond

flank3r (or anyone) can you pls compare thuban 24/7 settings (somewhere around 4.2ghz/2.8ghz/1600mhz) vs BD 24/7 settings whatever they might be? win7 64bit if you can :)

dont worry, u will seee and I can tell you, in practice is FX better (without superpi or wprime)! Maybe at Monday.
10-13-2011, 04:39 AM
crazydiamond

thanks flank3r, whenever you get a chance :)
10-13-2011, 04:48 AM
muzz

I find the lack of info from insiders deafening....this chip will go down in the AMD hall of shame.
10-13-2011, 12:43 PM
Naturecannon

Wasn't it here where Movieman sad not to worry, one would not be disappointed with BD. I noticed his name was in red and he appeared fairly credible, so much for that huh :confused: Well.... at least I will never believe what he says while I lurk for info, he must be in AMD's pocket.
10-13-2011, 12:54 PM
Hawkeye4077

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naturecannon

Wasn't it here where Movieman sad not to worry, one would not be disappointed with BD. I noticed his name was in red and he appeared fairly credible, so much for that huh :confused: Well.... at least I will never believe what he says while I lurk for info, he must be in AMD's pocket.

You folks sure are feast or famine... Not sure why the energy is wasted to type all these negative posts.

If you want to know more about MM I suggest you go read a couple pages worth of his posts in the World Community Grid forum. Then decide if you want to retract what you said
10-13-2011, 01:03 PM
hokiealumnus

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naturecannon

Wasn't it here where Movieman sad not to worry, one would not be disappointed with BD. I noticed his name was in red and he appeared fairly credible, so much for that huh :confused: Well.... at least I will never believe what he says while I lurk for info, he must be in AMD's pocket.

That's mighty bold of you talking about Movieman, not to mention rude. Obviously you don't know him. From another thread:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Movieman

Time for me to open my mouth when I see things like this.
My comments and "excitement" that I spoke about were based on what I saw when I was in Austin.
The relative performance in games and the few benches I saw looked VERY good to me.
Now yes, AMD did fly me there, put me up in a very nice hotel, fed me VERY well and yes, I came home with a FX8150 chip and a Asus CrosshairV board but ask yourself this:
As much as I appreciated the trip and the invitation do you really think I'd "sell my soul" for $500.00 in hardware or for $5000.00 for that matter?
As to why you haven't seen my review yet it's got nothing to do with any of the above but because of a technical foulup and that my friend is the 100% truth.
10-13-2011, 01:23 PM
Sparky

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naturecannon

Wasn't it here where Movieman sad not to worry, one would not be disappointed with BD. I noticed his name was in red and he appeared fairly credible, so much for that huh :confused: Well.... at least I will never believe what he says while I lurk for info, he must be in AMD's pocket.

... wow. That's a pretty big accusation there.

You really have no idea who you're talking about, do you? He is the last person who would be in ANYONE'S pocket.
10-13-2011, 01:26 PM
tbone8ty

JF-Amd hasnt posted since Oct 6th

:rolleyes:

what yurs take on the new bulldozer JF-AMD?
10-13-2011, 01:32 PM
Sentential

Quote:

Originally Posted by hokiealumnus

That's mighty bold of you talking about Movieman, not to mention rude. Obviously you don't know him. From another thread:

Sorry but that comment is *quite* damning to say the least... borderline shocking
10-13-2011, 01:34 PM
muziqaz

Quote:

Originally Posted by tbone8ty

JF-Amd hasnt posted since Oct 6th

:rolleyes:

what yurs take on the new bulldozer JF-AMD?

I think he is satisfied with it, as server apps will be ready for BD. Besides, Cray is aiming for #1 in top500 with their upgraded SuperComputer with interlagos inside.
10-13-2011, 01:42 PM
Leeghoofd

Has anyone tried folding on the FX ? Maybe it's better than the previous AMDs and maybe this was wat Dave was referring too...
10-13-2011, 01:48 PM
muziqaz

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leeghoofd

Has anyone tried folding on the FX ? Maybe it's better than the previous AMDs and maybe this was wat Dave was referring too...

I only have 13.5k ppd on normal A3 core wus number told by a friend. Basically he loled at it and I didn't bother to ask further about it.
I would be interested on how NB clocking improves things, as cache subsystem is total crap in BD, so maybe clocking CPU-NB would at least improve L3 cache speeds.
All these questions make me want to buy this thing. too bad UK only receives them on 21st. As i said 3rd world country :D
10-13-2011, 01:52 PM
hokiealumnus

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leeghoofd

Has anyone tried folding on the FX ? Maybe it's better than the previous AMDs and maybe this was wat Dave was referring too...

It didn't make our review so I posted it in the first comment instead. These are stock.

Quote:

Originally Posted by hokiealumnus

I had promised folding results to Shelnutt2, but they couldn't make the review. So, they will be posted in the first post!

Regular SMP work unit - 13698.9ppd

Bigadv work unit - 13859.2ppd

So between 13,500 and 14,000 at stock, which is right where it's positioned - around the PPD of a 2500K.

Heh, later on I posted...

Quote:

Originally Posted by hokiealumnus

I didn't take the time to editorialize when that was posted (I sleep too!), but my $.02 on DC performance with these - no one is going to touch them with a ten foot pole unless they have free electricity.
10-13-2011, 01:53 PM
El Gappo

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leeghoofd

Has anyone tried folding on the FX ? Maybe it's better than the previous AMDs and maybe this was wat Dave was referring too...

36.51 TPF on project 2686 in windows 7. Not looking good.

That's at 5ghz...
10-13-2011, 01:55 PM
muziqaz

Quote:

Originally Posted by hokiealumnus

I didn't take the time to editorialize when that was posted (I sleep too!), but my $.02 on DC performance with these - no one is going to touch them with a ten foot pole unless they have free electricity.

What a coincidence :D I have a free electricity :D
What about OCed?
I need to shut up now and go check the link :D
10-13-2011, 02:12 PM
Hawkeye4077

Costs me about $50/month to run my C32 system in Alaska
10-13-2011, 02:17 PM
Leeghoofd

Quote:

Originally Posted by El Gappo

36.51 TPF on project 2686 in windows 7. Not looking good. That's at 5ghz...

you pulling +400W ? How are the cores loaded ? max ?
10-13-2011, 02:25 PM
El Gappo

No idea, don't have a meter but yeah it was fully loaded.
10-13-2011, 02:26 PM
BeepBeep2

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sparky

... wow. That's a pretty big accusation there.

You really have no idea who you're talking about, do you? He is the last person who would be in ANYONE'S pocket.

Not just that but he primarily uses Intel CPU's.

In fact, at the same time he was talking about BD, he was talking about building a new monster intel cruncher.
10-13-2011, 02:27 PM
muziqaz

Quote:

Originally Posted by El Gappo

36.51 TPF on project 2686 in windows 7. Not looking good.

That's at 5ghz...

damn, nehalem at 4ghz does 31TPF :/ It looks like perf scales very badly with freq increase :/
10-13-2011, 02:37 PM
=SOC= Admiral

Would I be able to bother someone for numbers at 4.0 or 4.2GHz? Folding and anything else you would like to provide. Im just crunching numbers to see if it we even be worth it to purchase an 8150. I do recommend hardware to those I know but would also like to get into writing reviews. I have connections but just need to learn how to write a good review.
10-13-2011, 02:59 PM
PerryR

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeepBeep2

Not just that but he primarily uses Intel CPU's.

In fact, at the same time he was talking about BD, he was talking about building a new monster intel cruncher.

Which is why it's infinitely funny to read posts about him being in AMD's pocket. LOL.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page