I already have the M3P and Chronos Deluxe. I'm a fan of the Kingston though, and naturally, I also really dig the 830. I very much would like to test an 830 128GB, but I'm already doing the 256GB.
Printable View
I already have the M3P and Chronos Deluxe. I'm a fan of the Kingston though, and naturally, I also really dig the 830. I very much would like to test an 830 128GB, but I'm already doing the 256GB.
Todays update:
m4
860.8958 TiB
3650 hours
Avg speed 74.64 MiB/s.
AD gone from 119 to 117.
P/E 14853.
MD5 OK.
Reallocated sectors : 00
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?ap...tach_id=490347
Intel X25-M G1 80GB
603.36 TiB
22962 hours
Reallocated sectors : 154
Available Reserved space: 90
MWI=124
MD5 =OK
41.94 MiB/s on avg
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?ap...tach_id=490345
Intel X25-E 64GB
7.23 TiB
(49-30)=19 hours
Reallocated sectors : 0
Available Reserved space: 100
MWI=99
MD5 =OK
106.09 MiB/s on avg
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?ap...tach_id=490348
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?ap...tach_id=490346
The retention test went fine and the G1 is running fine again. Due to bad weather the power was out a couple of hours during the night. Everything is ok now.
Wow, BAT I really thought the X25-E would do an average of around 160MB/s. I really thought it would be faster on average.
Samsung 830 256 Day 55
1,312,193.38 GiB
1,281.43 TiB
292.49 MB/s Average
1298 Hours
5700 Wear Leveling Count
MWI 1
4/0 Erase/Program Fail
Used Reserved Block Count: 8/16384 sectors
----------------------
The 830 is all alone now.
That's too bad about the VT. Only 7 Initial and 3 Erase Bad Blocks. That's not really alot. It gave up cause of all the Bad Read Blocks.
I guess if we want one that works like it's supposed to ...it has to actually be a Crucial :)
Christopher: "Killer of SSD" indeed!
I think you have killed more SSDs then I've owned!
Very sad about the VT though, I thought it would have lasted a fair bit longer to be honest.
I'm responsible for the deaths of 10 or 11 SSDs. Only a couple of those were drives I wasn't trying to kill. I'm up to three dead in the past three days!Quote:
Originally Posted by canthearu
Ha, I only own 10 SSDs :)
The loop start at around 130 MiB/s and climbs to around 160 MiB/s but the 9 sec waiting between each loop pulls the avg down. I can try to shorten that some more.Quote:
Originally Posted by Christopher
B.A.T., you are the Bravest Man on the Face of the Earth.... don't be afraid to experiment. Considering the fact that there is 80GB of SLC on the 64GB E, I wouldn't hesitate to drop the the wait between loops or reduce pause per 1K files deleted. You need all the help you can get.
Thanks for that :)
With 5 sec between each loop the avg increases to 112 MiB/s. I'll try a couple of loops with 2 GB freespace since it so much OP.
Considering how much like the Gen1 80GB it is, I'd say it's performance is pretty damn good.
It really is :)
Maybe I need to treat it like the G1 with regular maintenace. I'll know in a couple of days.
Hmm, the X25-E would probably exceed 10PiB before failing .... gonna be a long wait if it is.
Let it run for some time (until i settles), it is interesting seeing how that drive develops the next few days.
~100MB/s w/o TRIM is pretty good for this workload, as the Intel does no background GC it wont benefit from extra pausing though.
The only cleaning the X25-V gets is the occational cleaning using the Toolbox, usually a few weeks between those.
My drive is still bootable so on it's 1 year day of testing I might try booting it. (3 more days)
I'm curios about how the wmi will perform. Then it's easyer to predict how much time this will take :)
I'm expecting/hoping for more.Quote:
Originally Posted by canthearu
The 64GB is rated for 2 petabytes of random writes, it'll be a long wait.
With an estimated avg speed of 90 MiB/s (I know I'm conservative here) I'll write 2,6 PiB a year.
Anvil has been testing for a year in 3 days and I'm only 6 weeks away from my first year. I'll think I'm up for the challenge :)
I've left the Vertex Turbo in the chart this time, as it wasn't updated in the previous chart.
Attachment 126748
Attachment 126747
Now I'm paranoid about the erase failures on the 830, and I can't stop checking in on it. It made it a good deal beyond MWI before the first reallocation, but now I'm gun shy. I already had to bury the Vertex Turbo in an unmarked grave.
I try to check in on the V a few times per day, it's not much one can do.
I have tried using the default windows driver (still raid mode) and the V was undoubtedly slower, within ~35-40 hours it had dropped below 30MiB/s.
Using the Intel 10 series driver (currently using 10.8) is clearly a winner vs the default one, the V can go for weeks at ~33MiB/s
The Torqx 2 has popped 8 more blocks since yesterday ... I'm preparing the funeral now.
That is a bit early, less than 150 TiB.
The Intel 520 looks to be doing fine.
As long as those blocks aren't all on the same die or plane you should be golden. At least, that's what I keep telling myself.
Todays update:
m4
866.3879 TiB
3671 hours
Avg speed 74.63 MiB/s.
AD gone from 117 to 114.
P/E 14945.
MD5 OK.
Reallocated sectors : 00
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?ap...tach_id=490490
Intel X25-M G1 80GB
606.44 TiB
22984 hours
Reallocated sectors : 154 to 155
Available Reserved space: 90
MWI=124
MD5 =OK
41.94 MiB/s on avg
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?ap...tach_id=490492
Intel X25-E 64GB
14,87 TiB
71-30=41 hours
Reallocated sectors : 0
Available Reserved space: 100
MWI=99
MD5 =OK
102.55 MiB/s on avg
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?ap...tach_id=490491
I haven't read all 173 pages but is there any drives in Raid0, Curious on the effects of no TRIM