Dual Core Opteron Thread #2

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

04-27-2006, 11:34 PM
ChkDsk

Quote:

Originally Posted by mursaat

Absolute & ChkDsk do you think removing the IHS could help? I'm gonna receive my 0610 soon and I think I can take the risk (the 0551 was a breeze to remove), but if the IHS contact is that good maybe it's not worth. I'm aiming for 2.9 24/7 and 3/3.1 benching with TTBT, 80fan over PWMIC.

@ChkDsk & Repoman have you tried even higher vLDT? for 3100 you need 345HTT so 1.5vLDT could help.

Ok, gonna answer both questions :D

Removing IS usefull IF your temps are HIGH. I've owned several single and dual core opterons and this 0610 is the first one I will not undress I think. The temps are so damn good it's not gonna help me! So see what temps you get when you have the chip. I think 2.9 is very much possible! :rolleyes:

Now, I'm back at the latest bèta bios, NF4LD329.BIN, and look at this...

http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/1197/30606mx.th.jpg

LTD is set at 1.2V in bios! :eek:
04-27-2006, 11:47 PM
Absolute_0

I always bump LDT voltage up +.1 from default when overclocking, I have never needed more. I don't even know if the .1 is absolutely necessary, but i'd rather use it than not use it.

Only remove IHS if 1) you are keeping the chip for sure and 2) it is pretty damn hot
04-27-2006, 11:58 PM
ChkDsk

Quote:

Originally Posted by Absolute_0

I always bump LDT voltage up +.1 from default when overclocking, I have never needed more. I don't even know if the .1 is absolutely necessary, but i'd rather use it than not use it.

Only remove IHS if 1) you are keeping the chip for sure and 2) it is pretty damn hot

I tried 1.4 and 1.5V on the LTD but this would cause my system to freeze after about 15mins of prime (anyone an idea why?. Artifacs and lockup. So I'll stick to 1.2 or 1.3 too :p:
04-28-2006, 12:32 AM
mursaat

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChkDsk

Ok, gonna answer both questions :D

Removing IS usefull IF your temps are HIGH. I've owned several single and dual core opterons and this 0610 is the first one I will not undress I think. The temps are so damn good it's not gonna help me! So see what temps you get when you have the chip. I think 2.9 is very much possible! :rolleyes:

Now, I'm back at the latest bèta bios, NF4LD329.BIN, and look at this...

http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/1197/30606mx.th.jpg

LTD is set at 1.2V in bios! :eek:

I know, but I meant with this exact chip CCBBE 0610 DPMW. I think I'll wait and see my temps.

Now I your SG in the screenshot, maybe you have fluctuations (1.2 shown as 1.18) in vLDT. 1.4 and 1.5 makes system hang (can't help dunno why temps are not a problem, I've run my PWMIC at 65c priming 8hrs no problem) so try 1.3 :D

You also have the +12v at 11,83 and 3.3 at 3,28. What PSU you have? I think its capable to run a DC at 3ghz, but maybe the fluctuations are making it crash?
04-28-2006, 12:34 AM
ChkDsk

Quote:

Originally Posted by mursaat

I know, but I meant with this exact chip CCBBE 0610 DPMW. I think I'll wait and see my temps.

Now I your SG in the screenshot, maybe you have fluctuations (1.2 shown as 1.18) in vLDT. 1.4 and 1.5 makes system hang (can't help dunno why temps are not a problem, I've run my PWMIC at 65c priming 8hrs no problem) so try 1.3 :D

You also have the +12v at 11,83 and 3.3 at 3,28. What PSU you have? I think its capable to run a DC at 3ghz, but maybe the fluctuations are making it crash?

Completely depends on how good the IHS contact is. Does not depend on the stepping from what I've seen... I have an Enermax Liberty 620W and I do not pay much attention to the SG 12/5/3V readings becaus on a multimeter they are perfect! They do not fluctuate either, according to SG...

[edit]

My CCB1E 0609FPAW @ 3.0GHz is in the FS section!

Sorry for OT :)

[edit 2]
Back on-topic... :eek:

http://img70.imageshack.us/img70/7166/308726vr.th.jpg

:banana:
04-28-2006, 03:37 AM
itznfb

ok, the database has been updated. its going pretty good. but there are quite a few outdated results, and even more un-official results. if you see your stats on the list, and they are not correct, or there is information missing, feel free to PM me with the updated info.

i was also informed that all CCB1E's may be coldbugged. is this true?
04-28-2006, 03:56 AM
ChkDsk

Quote:

Originally Posted by itznfb

ok, the database has been updated. its going pretty good. but there are quite a few outdated results, and even more un-official results. if you see your stats on the list, and they are not correct, or there is information missing, feel free to PM me with the updated info.

i was also informed that all CCB1E's may be coldbugged. is this true?

Nobody knows if all CCB1E's are coldbugged. But its very likely...:slap:
04-28-2006, 04:17 AM
`schr0et

I have a CCBWE 0551 UMPW (170) it's prime stable at 270x10 1.55V, not stable 275x10 but stable for web browsing.

Keeping it at 265x10 1.475V Prime stable..
04-28-2006, 04:21 AM
ChkDsk

Quote:

Originally Posted by `schr0et

I have a CCBWE 0551 UMPW (170) it's prime stable at 270x10 1.55V, not stable 275x10 but stable for web browsing.

Keeping it at 265x10 1.475V Prime stable..

Got some screenshots? :D

Having a hard time getting mine stable @ 3100MHz :slapass: I'm trying to sell my SLI-DR and give the CFX-3200 a try I think.
04-28-2006, 05:16 AM
masterofpuppets

Quote:

Originally Posted by `schr0et

I have a CCBWE 0551 UMPW (170) it's prime stable at 270x10 1.55V, not stable 275x10 but stable for web browsing.

Keeping it at 265x10 1.475V Prime stable..

I don't know 0551's very well, but judging by the better chips from that week, 1.55 seems a little high for 270*10.
04-28-2006, 05:21 AM
CompGeek

I had a 165 0551UPMW stable 2.74/1.55v
04-28-2006, 06:48 AM
Mastactor

This is what I got, What do you think?
CCBWE 0546MPMW

http://www.overclock.net/attachments...g?d=1146189018

Although I set the voltage to 1.425 in bios, it reads 1.5v:confused:
04-28-2006, 07:27 AM
CompGeek

thats pretty good.
04-28-2006, 07:58 AM
blazin-asian

@chkdsk

hmm...nice to see that a BIOS update helped you. my 170 is acting strange. i primed for about 2 hours and it was stable 2.8 @ 1.475, but i tried to do a 12 hour prime and core 1 would crap out at 2 mins (1st time) then 2 hours (second time). my load temps are around 48c so i dont think its a heat issue.

im using the 510-1 BIOS, so maybe a bios update would help? :slapass:
04-28-2006, 08:07 AM
ChkDsk

Quote:

Originally Posted by blazin-asian

@chkdsk

hmm...nice to see that a BIOS update helped you. my 170 is acting strange. i primed for about 2 hours and it was stable 2.8 @ 1.475, but i tried to do a 12 hour prime and core 1 would crap out at 2 mins (1st time) then 2 hours (second time). my load temps are around 48c so i dont think its a heat issue.

im using the 510-1 BIOS, so maybe a bios update would help? :slapass:

The latest bios helped me ALOT with my CCB1E 0609FPAW 170, so I'd say why not try it? :) I love that bios :p:
04-28-2006, 08:14 AM
blazin-asian

yummy...just what i wanted to hear. hehe. since im at work right now, what improvements did you notice? and im sure i asked before, but is your 3 GHz on water?

and was it Oscar Wu Beta BIOS?
04-28-2006, 08:16 AM
ChkDsk

Quote:

Originally Posted by blazin-asian

yummy...just what i wanted to hear. hehe. since im at work right now, what improvements did you notice? and im sure i asked before, but is your 3 GHz on water?

170 CCB1E 0609FPAW = naked on water (IHS contact was bad-ass :slapass: )
165 CCBBE 0610DPMW = WITH IHS on water (same temps as naked 170 :banana: )
04-28-2006, 08:20 AM
blazin-asian

thats pretty sweet. i kind of want to buy a CCBBE now to play with but my gf would kill me if i bought another CPU. is CCBBE only for 165? i havent seen a 170 with that memory code yet.
04-28-2006, 09:04 AM
Budwise

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChkDsk

170 CCB1E 0609FPAW = naked on water (IHS contact was bad-ass :slapass: )
165 CCBBE 0610DPMW = WITH IHS on water (same temps as naked 170 :banana: )

thats cuz the CCB1E's run so DANG HOT! I still am thrown for a loop at how hot they run compared to a CCBWE, even naked...
04-28-2006, 09:08 AM
blazin-asian

yea, the CCB1Es are freakin hot. this one is hotter then any of my other optys.

i have lots of air being pushed around in my computer by strong fans, so my load temps are barely 50c. that should be more then sufficient cooling until i get my water cooling in the future.
04-28-2006, 09:20 AM
ChkDsk

Quote:

Originally Posted by blazin-asian

yea, the CCB1Es are freakin hot. this one is hotter then any of my other optys.

i have lots of air being pushed around in my computer by strong fans, so my load temps are barely 50c. that should be more then sufficient cooling until i get my water cooling in the future.

Stated it several times... My 2 previous CCBWE 0550UPMW and CCB1E 0550VPMW 165's ran just as hot as the 0609FPAW... I just think I'm lucky with the IHS mount on this 0610 :D
04-28-2006, 10:10 AM
mascaras

got my opty 165- 0551 VPMW , i know it isnt a good steping but i take the risk cause it only coast 285€ (euros) .

till far its not too bad 2700@1.44v and 2800@1.50v .

Opty 165@2700mhz@1.44v
http://img278.imageshack.us/img278/1...estavel4xo.jpg

i also have a 3dmark 2001 run 2800mhz@1.50v pic , i put here later.

regards
04-28-2006, 10:47 AM
Reinvented

Those are some nice results you got there man. I look forward to getting mine in soon!
04-28-2006, 10:51 AM
blazin-asian

nice. that is definately one of the better 0551upmw's ive seen.
04-28-2006, 11:50 AM
mascaras

its not a UPMW its 0551 VPMW .

like i promised here is 3dmak 2001 @2800Mhz@1.50v:

http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/4...opty1651vu.jpg

regards

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page