is this real? suppose to be a 754 newcastle on water cooling. it looks questionable.
Printable View
is this real? suppose to be a 754 newcastle on water cooling. it looks questionable.
Very questionable.Quote:
Originally Posted by trans am
CPU runs at 2700, not 2960, like he claims to.
checksum's OK.Quote:
Originally Posted by THunDA
Thanks.. :)
DB72- yours passes perfect for 2500 mhz.
hag6br- thats a fake, comes up as unknown CPU, 0 mhz.
fake.
thanks Kunaak
woohooooo
got me some nu memory runs great :banana:
Holy crap! I knew it! Thanks man! This guy is going to get reamed!Quote:
Originally Posted by Jupiler
Please check..thanks :)
Please verify my friend's screen:
http://www.members.lycos.co.uk/tytan...%20@%204.0.JPG
http://www.members.lycos.co.uk/tytan...%20@%204.0.JPG
check this sum
LOL, you must be kidding me, I think his superpi score is a bit low :pQuote:
Originally Posted by missme
Quote:
Originally Posted by missme
:owned: :wierd:
lol all faked :rotf:
so i do realy want to know whether the cpu-z 12.6 can be fakedQuote:
Originally Posted by L0$t Pr0PhEt
i know it must be fake,but the checksum maybe right,that is I worry about...Quote:
Originally Posted by overcrash86
Regarding the "LOL, obviously fake" posts, we don't care if it's actually fake or not (we don't need a checksum verifier to show that), we just want to see if it's possible to fake 1.26, which was previously thought impossible :)
nothings impossible, unfortunatly, we got idiots out there that think "ok so CPUZ 1.26 can't be cheated on, so I think I'll figure out how to cheat on it", we do all this hard work to make overclocking more honest and theres always someone out there trying to make it easier for cheaters.
this is why I have a list of things out there to help verify OC's.
like clockgen, 3dmark2001se, CPUmark2 and other things.
CPUZ alone, is just a single tool, in no way meant to imply a OC is 100% cheat free.
CPUZ so far, is the most cheat free program I know of.
Crystal CPUID, Central Brain Identifier, WCPUID... these programs offer NO Anti Cheating Measures. Only the maker of CPUZ so far has worked with us to try and stop cheaters and cheating.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=411
So your all saying that thats a fake?
Either quote me or say...Godsa thats a fake..or Godsa that checks out :toast:
The checksum is ok, seems not faked.Quote:
Originally Posted by godsa
How would you know?
You've forgot about mine!
Kunaak- could you PLEASE verify mine ?? :cool:
Something's wrong with that checksum.Quote:
Originally Posted by majkel84
Checksum reads AMD cpu and "No valid" frequency.
Weird.
theres alot of things wrong with that screen shot.
in the processor name, it should read P4 EE, but it just says P4
in the code name it says northwood, it should say gallatin.
in the second processor name, it says 3200 mhz, it should say 3.2 ghz...
the available multipliers are from 16-0, it should say 8-16 or 12-16.
anyways, thats one of the easiest case of faking I ever seen...
tell your friend to try harder next time.
True, we've also noticed that and it seems quite strange to us and that's why I post it here to verify.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunaak
The screen's owner said that it's the early version of P4 EE so CPUz didn't recognize it as Gallatin but Northwood :stick: Freak !
jupiler, kunaak- Thanks for advice. :)
jhj thanks for the feedback..nice for you to chime in and lend a hand ;)
Wow ..didn't even think to check if it is 1.26 or not..just figured it was...My mistake.Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by godsa
jhj thanks for the feedback..nice for you to chime in and lend a hand
Again (and I'm not gonna repeat it) :
there is no 100% certainty that a screenshot, taken with older versions than 1.26 are cheat-free.
Therefore, we ask to post screenshots with version 1.26 used. Has been asked several times and weeks before. Maybe you should read Kunaak's posts again.
Apparently, you believe a guy who registered today and made 1 single post?
Sure Y not believe a guy with one post..Lol..the guy that trans am caught lieing >>AsianInvasion Rating: 1377 | Rated by 92 Visitors <<< :banana4: :banana: :toast: :D ;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by godsa
Again (and I'm not gonna repeat it) :
there is no 100% certainty that a screenshot, taken with older versions than 1.26 are cheat-free.
Therefore, we ask to post screenshots with version 1.26 used. Has been asked several times and weeks before. Maybe you should read Kunaak's posts again.
Apparently, you believe a guy who registered today and made 1 single post? :stick: