What ram are you using that can reach 315mhz 2-2-2-5. I want to see a Sandra mem benchmarkQuote:
Originally Posted by BeSaiD
Printable View
What ram are you using that can reach 315mhz 2-2-2-5. I want to see a Sandra mem benchmarkQuote:
Originally Posted by BeSaiD
Quote:
Originally Posted by moddolicous
I want to see sandra, too :P
They are some twinmos with winbond UTT @3.2v :eek: :slobber: :worship:
Edit: Thank you Jupiler for verifying that screen :D
True or fake? What a ugly color :(
http://www3.mtb-news.de/fotos/data/500/22832850.gif
Easy Tune is crap^^Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverna
I hope this colors are a fake! Ahhh .. i forgot it's SKYNET, he need those colors.
But do not even know why ... freaky.
Btw., i don't think it's an fake. ;)
can you check this one?
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...3400screen.jpg
The 3400+ 939 newcastles are real, but must be purchased in conjunction with a mobo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike11973
Sorry for the delay.
Checksum passes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexio
Looks OK but no 100% proof, as an older version has been used.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...3400screen.jpg
check please.
i'm curious cuz it's a dh7-cg stepping rather than a D0 stepping
Quote:
Originally Posted by shimmishim
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=23427&stc=1
here you go.
thanks!Quote:
Originally Posted by Karnivore
too bad the checksum can't tell the difference between 754 and 939...
it's just strange cuz i've never heard of a CG 939 ... oh well...
How this looks.....Im learnin alot from u guys
thanx
Can someone verified this :)
http://www.tictac.katrourke.com/pic/setyotomo.jpg
can you check this ?
http://membres.lycos.fr/overcrash/64...0+/2993Mhz.jpg
B I & overcrash86 :
checksum's OK.
tictac :
the checksum from the CPU-Z screenie at the left of the screen is not valid (checksum # has only 9 digits, should be 10). The other is OK.
Something's wrong with the first one.
ok thanks :)
thanx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jupiler
thanks ;)
can you verify this one.. something does not add up...
sorry, but he cut part of it off and barely readable for the checksum
hmm... looks like....Quote:
Originally Posted by hag6br
3132337881?
:toast:
um.... 458x21 = 9618mhz....
CPU-z not read multi correct? the 14x multi of 2.8ghz works for the 6.4ghz, but 458fsb? :slobber: I wish.
3132337881 is not valid anyway.
The P4B 2.8GHz uses 21x133, that explains the multiplier. It is the only true information in this screenshot ;-)
well, that is good enough.. Now time to go slam on himQuote:
Originally Posted by cpuz
:toast:
I should have added it up but was too lazy.. :rolleyes:
http://xtremesystems.org/forums/atta...id=23754&stc=1 first time trying this..
'hopes this works'
thx
When someone gets a change can you check this one out.. :)
Thanks alot..