Exactly. Just take a look at this Shanghai review:Quote:
Originally Posted by justapost
http://images.tecchannel.de/images/t...9/original.jpg
http://images.tecchannel.de/images/t...0/original.jpg
(please note that this is dual CPU configuration - 8 cores)
source
I multiplied up the Barcelona's results.
1 CPU benchmark ~24% advantage over Barcelona
Multi CPU ~8,5% advantage over Barcelona
:rolleyes:
mod: I found this CB result here in the XS few weeks ago.
Funny, most Phenom IIs have multi speedup at 3.58x-3.6x. 3.68x is quite good.
Phen Is got 3.9x+, must be 1CPU taking advantage of more cache now. But multi-CPU should at least show a 5% increase if anything.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliverda
you get the nearly the same results when you look at the techreport shanghai review.
~22% faster singel threaded
~9% multithreaded
scaling the 2.3 opteron to 2.7ghz. :yepp:
I get the nearly same speedup (~3.6x) with my 9950 since I have the ASUS board. It is beacuse the CPU tweak option in the BIOS. When you turn it off the 1 CPU result decreases but the multi is not. Strange...Quote:
Originally Posted by Macadamia
Perfect, but where is this advantage in Agena vs. Deneb relation?Quote:
Originally Posted by Hornet331
Look at that power consumption on the 790fx!...:shocked:
Maybe the Faster HT speed of Agena (compared to barcelona) makes more difference in cinebenche on the server platform, then compared to the desktop platform.Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliverda
Good or bad because they don't seem to have an agena vs deneb power consumption.
I also can't possibly believe the power consumption figures I see...because then it's pulling more juice then core2 and i7 in some and that doesn't seem right at all.
Both Barcelona and Shanghai have 1GHz HT. Only the NB clocks are different (1.8GHz vs. 2.2GHz).Quote:
Originally Posted by Hornet331
Why?Quote:
Originally Posted by Caveman787
Because you do not *want* to believe it?
All "official" reviews of comparisons between K10/Yorkies/Kentsfields (quad systems) shows that Agena is a terrible powerhog (later revisions 9950 do well in idle though).
This reviews shows that Deneb has improved greatly in this respect.
But I agree it would be nice to see direct comparison of power consumption between similary clocked Agenas/Denebs.
Such test surely will appear soon. :)
?? What does this mean? You cannot believe the power consumption figures because phenomII performs dismally?Quote:
I also can't possibly believe the power consumption figures I see...because then it's pulling more juice then core2 and i7 in some and that doesn't seem right at all.
I also would like to see an agena/deneb power consumption comparison @ 3.0Ghz...it seems that deneb has 5%++ lower power consumption than agena!...
Because i7 is a fair power hog and from previews out there it showed much lower power consumption than agena and it was supposedly similar to yorkfield in consumption.
Dante this is only 1 place using full system consumption whether than just processor and most likely an es, so it may be different for retail. Hopefully we will see soon.
Well, as you can see, it certainly isn't...
someone should tabulate the numbers again, that greek site giving me headache :(. loads very slowly on my crappy net.
a long time ago amd said that clock to clock deneb should use about half the power of agena. this seems a little optimistic to me but anyway if this was true just imagine what the power of agena would be using in these tests. im not saying they aren't true but id like to see more before making a conclusion about this because it just doesn't seem right.
Great job.
According to the configurations page:
- The Phenom II @3.7GHz system power consumption is with DDR2 memory @1200 (5-5-5-15) on Asus M3A79T.
- The Q6600 and Q9Χ00 @3.7GHz system power consumption is with DDR2 memory @1374 (7-7-7-15) on Asus P5E64 WS evolution.
- The Core i7 @3.7GHz system power consumption is with DDR3 memory @1352 (7-7-7-24) on Gigabyte ex58 extreme
Is this right?
The overclocked tests are up?
All the clock for clock tests between deneb and the intels are @3.7Ghz, and for deneb 2.0Ghz nb.Quote:
The overclocked tests are up?
yea check in general hardware theres a thread in there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Caveman787
2250mhz on NB clock and HT link for denebQuote:
Originally Posted by Dante80
correctQuote:
Originally Posted by Marios
here you areQuote:
Originally Posted by Caveman787
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=213200
so are going to see wattage comparison between agena and deneb?Quote:
Originally Posted by OverClocker_gr
i answered you at the other thread,
Yeah it's odd, first I though he had used windows 7 but he said he used winxp 32bit. On Agena the effect of memory and nb speed where neglectable if you don't need an 1/100 sec for hwbot battle. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by accord99
windows xp are slower than vista on wprime guyz.Wake up ;)
Coolice and I compared on winxp 32bit. You used vista on agena and deneb setups?Quote:
Originally Posted by OverClocker_gr
:welcome:
yes