Good one. A few more minutes and it would pass the kill-zone. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sniper
Is this your good old #3848A352 or a new one? In case what's the tricks for such a low Vcore?
Printable View
Good one. A few more minutes and it would pass the kill-zone. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sniper
Is this your good old #3848A352 or a new one? In case what's the tricks for such a low Vcore?
3924A346
19*200MHz @ 1.200V LLC ON, p95, LinX stable and all.
Its the same 3848A352.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam_oslo
This run was with 6 mem mp 7-7-7-20, requires less vcore than 8 mp. Also I'v compensatet low vcore with slightly higher then needed vtt (1.3).
And by switching from air to water gives lower temp, requiring less vcore. A win-win situation :)
http://img.techpowerup.org/091001/4305-4.png
batch: 3849A837
24/7 OC
200*20 - 4GHz HT on, 1.26V vcore, QPI/VTT and PLL @ default values
200*21 - 4.2GHz HT on, 1.3V vcore, QPI/VTT and PLL @ default values
highest 3DMark 06 frequency
4.4GHz HT on, 1.43V vcore, 1.25V QPI/VTT, 1.9V PLL
highest OC with HT ON:
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/712731.png
highest OC with HT ON:
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/733852.png
max BCLK (for now, with 1.35V QPI/VTT and 2.0V PLL):
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/618021.png
All done with TRUE and 2x120mm Antec fans
I see, interesting findings. Actually after playing with my CPU for a wile, I was expecting it to get stable @4.3GHZ(205x21) 1.24v. But even if it runs pretty much everything I use daily (and feels stable too) with 1.23v, but I couldn't get it Prime-stable before hitting 1.28v :shrug: Linx is much easier than Prime on my CPU too (but maybe it got something to do with my MB, I guess).Quote:
Originally Posted by Sniper
Uncore:QPI 1:1 both at x18 @3.7GHZ is running stable with VVT=1.21v(BIOS set) and therefore I didn't try the idea of trying higher VVT as much, yet. My MB has a tendency to over-volt the VVT too, and 1.21v BIOS set will report 1.28v in BIOS, and that's another reason for keeping the VVT at low volt.
But your findings are interesting, and I may soon get time to give a shot on higher VVT to see if it will Prime with lower Vcore with 12GB RAM at x6.
What's your Uncore, and what Vdimm are you using?
14x uncore and 1.64 vdimm. 30 min of LinX is about as hard as 2-3 hours of prime on this cpu/mb. Never got my DFI to play nice with prime (LinX was np), so I'v sold it.
Very nice looks like xeon good batches are the dominators of SKT1366 overclocking ... now the question is where you can get one of those apart from you (if)... tried to match that vcore and this is what i got from the i7 920 before the lovely blue screen ... looks like its also thirsty for water:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Sniper
http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/3592/87032847.jpg
3845B027 :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by rusty
http://img295.imageshack.us/ifs/3380...oldenbatch.jpg
Got few others too... but my hands are now eaching for a xeon 3848A352 ;)
Yes very tempting... :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam_oslo
You have a very good chip there imo, not that many can match yours. Even if you could find a brand new 3848A352 there is no quarantee that it is as good as mine - or it could be even better. I had two of these 3848A352, and the other one was aproximatly 50-70 mhz behind this one.
In a couple of months we will have i9, and maybe 32nm i7?, then the race is on again and everyone gets dealt new chips.
lol I think your absolutely right my friend i should be happy with this 24/7 settings beside its not the best setup im running on air ! :yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sniper
Im not a pro overclocker either... ppl use chilled water phace change dominator gt classified days after days of tweaking and then comesup with little less vcore or a number around 5Ghz... ;)
http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/922/4200t.jpg
I collected 5 great batches so far within the past 6 months.... sold 2 of my other batches to local mates ...
last one sold today 3845B (offer was too good to resist) and only two 3849B remaining one for me and one for...perhaps you... :up:
They all are known to hit big numbers with proper setup. :yepp:
As far as I have manged to follow, 3845B027 is one of the best batches out there. But a good max 24/7 OC would depend on other components like MB, RAM, and even GPU too.
The PCIe or the GPU (I'm not sure which yet), seams to be making some problems when the CPU hits @4.3GHZ(205x21). I have been testing with several different settings, Uncore (14x, 15x, 18x), VVT from 1.21v to 1.32v, Vcore=1.23v to 1.26v, and x6 RAM, but it has always been giving BSOD 3 minutes into Prime (almost on spot every time).
It Primes easily @4.3GHZ for about 3 minutes with Vcore=1,23v and up, but then suddenly the GPU core clocks raises from 2D to 3D, and a BSOD follows right at the same time. It will only pass when the Vcore hits 1.28v.
I'm not sure yet, maybe it is the GPU (GTX 295), or maybe the PCIe ? or maybe even my 12GB "mixed" RAM?. But I'm still working on it and hoping :fight: if I find the problem then the CPU would run stable with less Vcore.
Imo, pimping your cpu's here with 16 min prime runs on a mb known for throtling is kind of dubious if you ask me. Why dont you use the for sale section ?
Yes had to let it go to save my friendship lol nevertheless 026 is almost in pair with 027.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam_oslo
GTX 295 is definately it reminds me of my 4870x2 holding back the oc...raised pcie a lot and ended up frying the hdd, mixed ram not an ideal oc setup, therefore your cpu has more potential...:up:
This thread is about batches isnt it?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sniper
16min prime / linx is not that i post all the time you can look my previous posts in different threads. In Core i7 920 rev D0 stepping 5 thread when you requested a all memory 20 run linx I did, took me nearly an hour (how could you forget) would want to see how your batch does with linx all test,
Yes but got the 0006 bios now for no throttling :D
Thought to let ppl know as Im getting reed of my batch collection, not that i expect a real sell from the forum but never the less doesnt mind either if any body looking hard but again all my post here are ABOUT BATCHES. and 16 min gives a pass on prime to take a snap as you did aswell as i dont know of any restrictios that you cant :D
Come to think of it yes I might...
Haven't seen my batch 3849a832 in here (bit of a long read though, could've missed it).
Here's some 20 pass linx results, been hooked on benching lately & haven't made time for a long prime run yet...
4.2 ghz, 1.248V idle 1.216 loaded
http://i775.photobucket.com/albums/y...20passlinx.jpg
4.4 ghz, 1.360 idle 1.328 loaded
http://i775.photobucket.com/albums/y...linx20pass.jpg
http://i775.photobucket.com/albums/y...inxrunning.jpg
Man, I' been shopping around for one of those i7's that'll hit 4.2Ghz on super low voltages that you guys get! They're hard as hell to find!
I want to ask.
Does someone have a XEON W3502 with this batch: 3901A.
Because I have the oportunity to get one of those and would be nice to know if it is worthy.
Mi actual cpu a 920 D0 and the batch begins with 49, does 4.2 with 1.36875 vcore on BIOS with HT enable.
hey guys i just got myself a D0 its new, batch# 3918A478 anyone here have one of these?
Hmmm... mine's 3917C045 :confused:
i wanted some help on the configs for the UD5, my goal is 4.2 atm
Bought a core i7 3911A237 off craigslist for $150, it does 4.2Ghz rock stable with vcore 1.25v under load qpi is 1.3v, haven't bothered to go higher until finish building my loop :)
Wich one is your motherboard?
Because I also have one of does but... it need a lot more vcore :p
I am not aware of a C batch, I only thought As and Bs !! :confused::confused::confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Aphellyon
Weird, maybe it does 5 Ghz on air?! :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Salamndar
Has anyone have the configurations for the UD5? i wanted to check out how much mine can go up to my goal is to take it to 4.2 stable, i also use 3x1GB Gskill 1600
Thanks
Gigabyte EX58-UD5/Extreme Discussion ThreadQuote:
Originally Posted by Godmyster
Check here.
4.2 should be a walk in the park. :up:
Ive tried asking there but havent had an answer yet, im just looking for the settings for the UD5 that could take me to 4.2 easy...
Thanks
Lazy! :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Godmyster
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...postcount=3756
Enjoy! :D
Ok i tried out these settings but they didnt work for me everytime it tried to boot it would say "BOOTMSG is missing" so i tried to put to vcore to 1.38v it would get to the Welcome screen and freeze and give me the blue screen with the numbers counting up to 100 and would restart on it self, any ideas?
CPU Clock Ratio [20x]
Advanced CPU Features [Press Enter]:
CPU Clock Ratio [20x]
Intel(R) Turbo Boost Tech [Enabled]
CPU Cores Enabled [All]
CPU Multi Threading [Enabled]
CPU Enhanced Halt (C1E) [Enabled]
C3/C6/C7 State Support [Disabled]
CPU Thermal Monitor [Enabled]
CPU EIST Function [Enabled]
Virtualization Technology [Disabled]
Bi-Directional PROCHOT [Disabled]
Uncore & QPI Features [Press Enter]:
QPI Link Speed [x36]
Uncore Frequency [x19]
Isonchronous Frequency [Enabled]
Advanced Clock Control [Press Enter]:
standard clock control
Base Clock (BCLK) Control [Enabled]
BCLK Frequency (MHz) [200]
PCI Express Frequency (MHz) [AUTO]
C.I.A.2 [Disabled]
advanced clock control
CPU Clock Drive [ 800mV]
PCI Express Clock Drive [ 900mV]
CPU Clock Skew [ 100ps]
IOH Clock Skew [ 0ps]
Performance Enhance [Turbo]
Extreme Memory Profile (X.M.P.) [Disabled]
System Memory Multiplier (SPD) [x8]
DRAM Timing Selectable (sPD) [Manual]
Channel A
CAS Latency Time 8 [9]
tRCD 8 [9]
tRP 8 [9]
tRAS 20 [24]
Channel B
CAS Latency Time 8 [9]
tRCD 8 [9]
tRP 8 [9]
tRAS 20 [24]
Channel C
CAS Latency Time 8 [9]
tRCD 8 [9]
tRP 8 [9]
tRAS 20 [24]
Advanced Voltage Control [Press Enter]:
Load Line Calibration [Enabled]
CPU Vcore 1.15v [1.28750v]
QPI/VTT Voltage 1.150v [1.320v]
CPU PLL 1.800v [1.840v]
MCH
PCIE 1.500v [1.540v]
QPI PLL 1.100v [1.140v]
IOH Core 1.100v [1.200v]
ICH I/O 1.500v [AUTO]
ICH Core 1.1v [1.200v]
DRAM
DRAM Voltage 1.500v [1.660v]
DRAM Termination 0.750v [AUTO]
Ch-A Data VRef. 0.750v [AUTO]
Ch-B Data VRef. 0.750v [AUTO]
Ch-C Data VRef. 0.750v [AUTO]
Ch-A Address VRef. 0.750v [AUTO]
Ch-B Address VRef. 0.750v [AUTO]
Ch-C Address VRef. 0.750v [AUTO]
Try the below changes. Edit: if your on air, you may have temp problems with below settings...
If it fails, then run down mem multi to 6x and uncore to 13x and try again. If it works check stability and then walk down vcore and vtt.
If still fails try decrease bclk to 196 and try again. If it works there, you may just need more vcore and/or vtt for 21x200.
CPU Enhanced Halt (C1E) [Disabled]
CPU EIST Function [Disabled]
Uncore Frequency [x17]
CPU Clock Skew [ 0ps]
CPU Vcore 1.15v [1.360v]
QPI/VTT Voltage 1.150v [1.360v]
CPU PLL 1.800v [1.800v]
PCIE 1.500v [1.500v]
QPI PLL 1.100v [1.100v]
IOH Core 1.100v [1.160v]
ICH I/O 1.500v [1.500]
ICH Core 1.1v [1.100v]
im on stock cool atm how much can i go up to with stock?
Your stock cooling is likely what is keeping you from being able to boot at 4.2. Most dont use stock cooling above 3.8 to 4, and even then will need a decent chip with low vcore/vtt requirements.
If at stock I would try no higher than 4 at first, and hope you need really low vcore/vtt for it, and dont be surprised if you cant even get 4 stable on stock.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rge
If he disables EIST he won't be able to get Turbo mode (21x multiplier).
Btw, i think that there is no need for 1.36V of QPI/VTT voltage. My D0 is prime stable @ stock QPI/VTT voltage on 4.2GHz with 1.3V vcore.
Yeah, i know, every CPU is different but 1.36V of QPI/VTT voltage is overkill.
EDIT: I see now that he is on stock cooling. I really don't recommend to go over 3.6GHz with stock cooling.
Obviously you dont have a GB board. EIST has nothing to do with turbo on GB board.Quote:
Originally Posted by madmax999
I suggested those settings because he has been trying for several days, and already tried lower settings and was unable to get into windows with 1.38vcore and 1.32qpi/vtt, so like you said yourself, your settings are irrelevant for vcore qpi/vtt. My chip needs 1.34 qpi/vtt for 21x200, any lower and bsods...but I did not go by that irrelevant information either, instead I read what he previously tried.
And bottom line, once found out he was on stock cooling, pretty much made everything moot, as that was likely his problem from the beginning.
There aren't enough C0's in this thread any more. Here's an old i7. HT is off obviously, wouldn't have a hope in hell getting to 4GHz stable with reasonable voltage (for a C0) and reasonable temps with it left on.
http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/f...itled-40-2.jpg
(temps are bottom right in the task bar)
Oh, sorry, i didn't know that, thnx on this information :)Quote:
Originally Posted by rge
Neither did i, but i didn't know that there are so bad D0 revisions.Quote:
Originally Posted by rge
Agreed.Quote:
Originally Posted by rge
well i got a UD5 and it seems there is nothing
wrong with my cpu:D same batch as one of imo's
3849B018.im so glad it was the dfi board after
seeing imo's results.so this morning after verifying
that it would prime without failing or BSOD at stock
settings,i tried my very first i7 OC.and its not bad
at all.today ill try to lowering some voltages.
http://i33.tinypic.com/j124n7.jpg
Very nice radaja you got even a nicer overclock i see, what ram are you using?
Good Batch almost similar to the best 3845B027.
Great work, keep us updated. ;)
thanks imo.well i lowered the vcore two notches
and all good.4.2@ 1.18v.
im using my OZC ddr3-1333 LV Animals.
http://i34.tinypic.com/25k536c.jpg
http://i33.tinypic.com/303a453.jpg
Check if you can be stable with prime 95 default blend test/ small FFt test
Would love to see how your setup does with linx full mem test.
Neverthe less so far looking great :up:
that is an hour of prime blend,will try linx next.ive lowered the vcore three more notches1.206v bios/1.168vload.
will see how it does.
48m prime blend w/1.16vcore
http://i38.tinypic.com/4l6fk5.jpg
linx
http://i37.tinypic.com/14abg5j.jpg
http://i37.tinypic.com/1zd20j8.jpg
Excellent, I think you have even beater overclock than the Xeon we seen before. Looks like core i7 still has the crown of skt 1366 overclocking thanks to the UD5 and batch # 3849B018 :D
Ok then what cooler do you guys recommend me getting for the D0?
thanks imo,going to see if i can run my memory at ddr-2000 now
True or prolimatech with 2 scythee 120mm ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Godmyster
Quote:
Originally Posted by radaja
That's with LLC off right?
nope.llc is enabled
Interesting... It shouldn't vdroop by that much if LLC is on.Quote:
Originally Posted by radaja
I turned LLC off on my machine because of all the rumors that it kills chips because of the sharp voltage spikes that it produces... dunno how true it is though.
gigabyte MB's have this thing where you can set say
1.18-1.20-1.206 and in cpuz it just stays at 1.16
and 1.218-1.22-1.225 and cpu shows 1.18v
at least on all my ep45-UD3P/R's it did and im
assuming its the same on this board too.
This is the exact same on the X58 UD5 mobo, I have to raise the Vcore by three increments in the BIOS before it changes in CPUZ, just like you have described.Quote:
Originally Posted by radaja
yea its a gigabyte thing.i used to see people,just an example
in cpuz thier vcore was 1.19 and im like what the hell how you getting 1.19v
because mine went 1.186 to 1.20.but then i realized they are using different
MB's asus or evga or biostar,each have different increment scales
Yep the bios changes vcore in increments of .00625v but the sensor on the mobo which cpuz is reading reports in steps of .016v. So you have to go up 2-3 steps to see the change.
Just had a look back at your posts radaja, that is one mighty fine chip you have got there mate!!
Wish I could get my hands on a chip that could run on those kinda voltages.
im just glad it works,well im also mighty happy that its good too.
but after i got it and my dfi board and couldnt get it to prime at stock settings
i thought the worse,that it was going to be the cpu because everything is inside
now(IMC)and then seeing imo's cpu i thought great ive got a great batch but ill
never experience it.but alls good now.
BTW thanks blunt
Another update. Batch #3910A372. :) I was very stoked when I woke up this morning to find it still going. This is on air.
CPU 1.368V
QPI 1.35V
PLL 1.82
IOH 1.18
http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/7156/4300i7.jpg
I test my I7 920 D0 3837A765
at 4113
http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/1657/41131224v.jpg
at 4523
http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/4794/45231424.jpg
nicely done. 4.5 GHz at 1.424v is not bad at all considering its actually stable. Not just bench stable.
Wow, you guys are way better at this then me. I was proud to get 4ghz @ 1.264v. Now I feel like crawling back to my computer room with my tail between my legs.
4GHZ is still quite awesome Scott. :)
settings so far
3919A707
4.3ghz
http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...ntitled-13.jpg
Ver nice billdavis how many cards? Nvidia or Radeon? Model? Brand? Settings?
Was wondering would you be kind enough to lend me 1 3Dmark to make mine a round figure :D
http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/5015/15999.png
Nice score lol i was thinking on getting the PROLIMATECH for my D0 what do you guys think? or with less money i can get something similer?
Thanks
Finished tweaking my clock so time to add to the database, more to come from this yet :up:
Batch# 3850A795
Bios Settings:
Vcore: 1.2875v
Vtt: 1.325v
IOH: 1.2v
PLL 1.8v
Vdimm: 1.66v
Cooling is HK 3.0, MIPS NB/SB/NF200 and 2x MIPS Mosfet blocks on P6T6 WS Rev, DDC 18w, 120.4 Thermochill rad
http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/b.../paulstest.jpg
Hi- someone he met fpo / batch in the i7-975 EE-3924A401?
heres my latest.
202x21@4242 ddr3-1616 7-7-7-21
Batch# 3849B018
Bios Settings:
Vcore: 1.206v bios/1.16v load
Vtt: 1.30v
IOH: 1.14v
PLL 1.8v
Vdimm: 1.68v
prime95 blend
http://i33.tinypic.com/256xru0.jpg
everest
http://i34.tinypic.com/m8h568.jpg
im having problems getting 20x210@4200 with turbo and HT off.
any advice
I don't get memory speed even near that Radaja. Anyone have any ideas why? Not the latest version of Everest perhaps?
http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/7564/wtfh.jpg
Check your timings.
Thought my timings were pretty good.
Cas 7 against cas 8? :shrug:
yep,thats what im thinking.also im on vista64,i know on my ddr2 lga775 rigsQuote:
Originally Posted by FabricioGS
there was a big diff in copy scores between 32bit and 64bit
Do you get same numbers on retry? Everest has a tendency to report "wrong" numbers once a while, but reports "correct" mostly. But in case it would report too high, and I have never seen it to report too low (at least on system).Quote:
Originally Posted by hetsaq
Your numbers are too low for your Uncore and timings. It seams to be off by about 3000MB/s(read). something seams to be wrong, but it is not easy to say what from a distance. You can try to bench with higher Vdimm to check if it is a hit&miss.
It seems to be right around the same no matter how many times I refresh. I will try upping the dimm voltage and report back. Thank you.
*Edit* Going from 1.66 to 1.68 did absolutely nothing. I have been trying to nail this down for a month now. :(
If your RAM can't handle the speed, (and sometimes raising the Vdimm wouldn't help either), then you can get bad results. Have you tested the stability of the RAM and IMC (with memtest or similar)? Take a new HyperPi32M run anyways, it will show the problem fast.
You can also try to bench with x6 RAM @6-7-6-22 (or something similar), but try to keep the Uncore at the same x16. Just to see if you can get better numbers.
I ran 5 passes of memtest and 8 hours of prime blend. I will try the lower speed and see if that helps and run as HyperPI 32M test as well, do I want to use all 8 cores?
8 hours of prime blend means stable RAM (at least at the time you tried). Most probably it is stable now too, but you never know. HyperPi32M is fast and pushes both RAM and IMC, and yes with all 8 Cores.
Thank you Sam, hope I am not being too much trouble.
No problem. I will learn from your affords too :)
When you get bad benching result, it is always a good idea to check if it is stable.
I have been playing with a OCZ P 1333MHZ CL7 earlier, and it could bench 17000+(Everest read) with x6 RAM @6-7-7-22 1.65v. Your sticks are better and should do better. It is interesting to see why it is acting like this.
It went through HyperPI 32M on all 8 cores just fine. I still haven't tried the lower timings yet.
*EDIT* 6X ram
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/1483/lolwhut.jpg
I have a brand new never used megahalem in the box for sale, with extra fan clips im selling. If your intrested PM me. Ill do a good a deal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Godmyster
@hetsag
That's good news, your RAM is stable at x8 and you can keep it there. Now you can focus on other stuff and then when I look at the first screen you posted,
your L3-latency is 14.4 ns, and it is too high. It is strange, but it gets more strange (to me at least) when your L3-read/right are "normal", and all L1 and L2 numbers are "normal" too. I'm not exactly sure what this means, but could indicate some problems with IMC or Uncoore?
I have to look this up, and you could try to follow this too.
Maybe somebody else knows what can make L3-latency to get so high?
I didn't know that was high, but when looking at Rad's screenshot it certainly is.
Based on what you have done so far, I'm under impression that your RAM is OK, and you should get higher bench results than this.
IMC and Uncore would be next to check, but it can take a while to iron out, and maybe you should post it i a new tread.
I have never seen this problem before, and couldn't find much on a fast googling either, but i will try look it up closer later. The new IMC have some "strange new stuff" that is always interesting to follow.
I posted it in the P6T thread as well, maybe someone will have an idea there.
Do you have B2B in your bios ?
I do, by default it is set to 0. I check CPU Tweaker and it says disabled. I manually set it to 4 (Lowest option I have), makes no difference in my results. :(
Anyone hear anything good or bad about this batch number?
#3920B535 D0
here is my latest on W3520 (#3848A352)
VVT=1.23/1.26v (BIOS/load) :)
3x2GB @1680MHZ 7-8-7-21 1.65v
w3520 @4.41GHZ(210x21) 1.32v, 1 hour OCCT, on air
http://img.techpowerup.org/091011/Capture010006.jpg
Sam_oslo good work but like to see if thats Linx 4096 mem 20 run / prime default small fft stable? :rolleyes:
Thx, I have tested the @4.3GHZ(205x21) 1.28v with 1 hour prime small ftt and based on that, It would probably pass with a few degrees more core-temp. But I haven't had any prime run on this, yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by imo
Based on my earlier testes which LinX, it has always passed with a couple of notches less Vcore (I guess it got to something with my MB). It would probably pass the Linx too, but I haven't any Linx run yet.
cool, for some reason i cant get mine linx all mem stable @ 4.4G with HT requires about 1.34v to be linx all mem stable:shakes:
but 1.31 v ok for prime :D
Anyone hear anything good or bad about this batch number?
Xeon w3520 #3920B524 D0.
Thanks.
That's cool, 1.31v prime is great.Quote:
Originally Posted by imo
Just tested the stability of RAM and IMC on 4.41GHZ setup for W3520 (#3848A352), and here vi go :
3x2GB @1680MHZ 7-8-7-21 1.65v
Uncore x18 (3780MHZ)
VVT=1.23/1.26v (BIOS/Load)
w3520 @4.41GHZ(210x21) 1.32v
HyperPi32M stable :)
http://img.techpowerup.org/091012/Capture012298.jpg
Hello I have problems with my new Xeon to pass 205 bclk, no matter what the multiplier or the configuration.
If anyone can help me
Thanks a lot
Rampage 2 extreme
Xeon 3520 batch 3919A652
G.Skill Storm 2000mhz 8-8-8-21 1n
These are the bios settings I use to have it stable at 200x21
http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/2...c00080p.th.jpg
http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/3...00081zs.th.jpg
http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/2103/dsc00082he.th.jpg
http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/5528/dsc00088c.th.jpg
http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/8...00089ce.th.jpg
Temperatures do not exceed 70 degrees in LinX.
On Antec 850 Quattro
MCP655b pump cooling Swiftech Apogee GTZ in Cpu and Swiftech waterblock on the NB
Radiator 3x12
Well I hope somebody can help pass the wall of 205
Thanks
I just started clocking mine again. Its a decent overclock, but not too good, and I cant go any higher (185 MHZ fsb = BSOD even with higher volts).
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/2694/cpuclockk.jpg
Thats with 1.275v on both the CPU and QPI.
batch@3906a350
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=731686
Great Tony Your Top Of List Number 1 :D
Good one, and with Uncore > 50k :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by tonygr
This batch seams to have a great IMC too.
thanks, that cpu is very crazy !
i have played on wprime and 5230 uncore!