he did write 1.61v :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Burnt_Ram
Water?Quote:
Originally Posted by halo112358
Printable View
he did write 1.61v :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Burnt_Ram
Water?Quote:
Originally Posted by halo112358
Eight minutes? Get back at 8 hours. Even though that admittedly is an admirable overclock.Quote:
Originally Posted by halo112358
CCBBE 0616XPMW rocks :woot:
but I've not water cooling :stick:
Im giving it 1.61v. I did some new testing this night and got it up to 365~3289mhz. Only stable for like 5-10 sec. If i just could lower the temp's a litle bit more, then a validation coule be created. Got it down to core0 20C core1 25C, using coretemp.Quote:
Originally Posted by Burnt_Ram
This is my sweetie. 0615DPMW. Hitting the 2,8Ghz with 1.35V (stock). If you have a DFI nF4 mainboard and CPU-Z shows 1.456V then you have 1.500V in BIOS and that is the real voltage of your CPU, so dont tell us the CPU-Z value, the BIOS setting is the important one!
http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/7844/ffymdjxhfq4.jpg
Two things Peter:Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Burg
1)Why don't you just use Orthos to stress test? It's Prime 95 but under a far easier to use interface.
http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/385
2)Use Core Temp to monitor your temps. Smartguardian is worthless.
http://www.thecoolest.zerobrains.com/CoreTemp/
I have a 165 with the same stepping and you're right, it's nice to hit 2.8 at stock vcore. I run mine 24/7 at 2.95Ghz 1.45v. I can hit 3Ghz easily but I don't see the need to pump the extra .05v necessary to get there for only an additional 50Mhz.
The CCBBE 0615 DPMW are nice chips, aren't they? :)
He's using the dualcore version of P95.
Smartguardian isn't worthless either, except in the time of the Expert temp problem. You will notice only a small difference in Coretemp and onboard sensors.
:)
Lol, I didn't realize that there's a dual-core version of Prime 95 out there. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by v0dka
However, I do notice large discrepancies between Core Temp and my Smartguardian. I trust Core Temp far more. Smartguardian is giving me temps of 38-39C when I'm stress testing my 165 @3.0Ghz+ 1.525v. Core Temp is giving me 46-47C. My system uses a Coolit Freezone but there's no way in hell that I'm getting the temps that Smartguardian is indicating.
For those of you who are wondering how the AM2 Opterons overclock, here is my max clock for my Opty 1218 given it about 1,64Volts and Zalman 9500 cooler with some cold room temps.
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=163477
Prime stable for 14 hours at 3GHz and 1,48 Volts.
Edit: Fixed the link
A nice validation of a stable 3201Mhz 165 ^^ But im running for more.:rolleyes:
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=164666
stable? superpi 1m stable?Quote:
Originally Posted by c.freak
did you run prime ou sp2004 ?
Tried to oc with "cold" air after school today, and my cpu seems to like "cold" air very much :) (compared with room-temps, but the stepping is still not good...). Did 2,7 with 1,4 volts, maxed out at 2,58 with 1,4 + room-temp air. But my mobo doesn't like htt-freq's over 300 :(
Stepping: CCBBE 0615MPMW
PS. It was only 3 C, but snow is comming tomorrow :) Give me a DFi !!!!
I finnally got my 165 from Newegg and it ended up being a LCB9E 0646RPMW. I did pop it in and was able to get 290x9 @ 1.425 @ 47C and 2700 @ 1.45 @ 50C. I was able to get it to post at 2800 but it was in no way stable. I ended up selling it and I have CCBBE 0610DPMW comming in the mail. From what I have seen my nF3 Ultra-D is clocking these Dual Core very well. I will let you guys know how it pans out with the 0610.
Where can we download that dualcore version of p95? I checked the official homepage and nothing there....Quote:
Originally Posted by v0dka
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjeffreys
That's sad to hear that the new steppings aren't doing so well. I was hoping the refined F3 90nm steppings would show up on some 939 dual core opterons. Or atleast they would get better, people keep talking about the EOL's but I have yet to see them for dual core 939 opterons, I'd say we can still get new ones by the end of the year. And hopefully...we'll see some better spins than what we're traditionally used to.
Orthos is at: http://sp2004.fre3.com/beta/beta2.htmQuote:
Originally Posted by jamex
My LCB9E 0646RPMW is prime stable at 2.8-1.4v.Right now it is at 2.9-1.5v.But i have W/c.I think that this chip wants water.It's not a great chip like some ccbbe but is far better than a ccbweQuote:
Originally Posted by jjeffreys
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Burg
Hey Peter, where did you download that dual core Prime 95?
I am using a lapped XP-90c with AS5 and a Tornado on top, I think you are right about wanting the water. In fact I bet there is a good chance that with the LCB9E there may not be a cold bug so it may be one of those chips that likes the low temps. I do agree that it is an OK chip but like so many others I am looking for 3.0. The person I sold it to is more than happy with a 40% OC.Quote:
My LCB9E 0646RPMW is prime stable at 2.8-1.4v.Right now it is at 2.9-1.5v.But i have W/c.I think that this chip wants water.It's not a great chip like some ccbbe but is far better than a ccbwe
Yeah, I don't think it's at its limit, but the htt link multi is set at x3 and the mem divider is at 266mhz (which is actually underclocking the memory).Quote:
Originally Posted by MARyo
Well I got my new CCBBE 0610DPMW here is a shot at 3.0
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/1...shot136ej6.jpg
It was getting way too hot though so I backed it down to 2.9 one hour and going.
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/6...shot138rz6.jpg
You've got a nice chip there. I think you can get more out of it with some watercooling. It's obvious that the air cooling is holding you back. I would also run Orthos at Priority 9 minimum and preferably Priority 10 to get a more accurate gauge of stability. I tightened up my RAM timings and am running Orthos right this minute with Priority 10 @2.961Ghz. Four hours in and so far, so good.Quote:
Originally Posted by jjeffreys
I've got a Coolit Freezone taking care of my chip and at 1.45v, I'm happy so far:
http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/8995/295qj6.jpg
I agree I need water. I think that will be an upgrade I shoot for before the summer. My goal was to see 3.0 and I know that the only thing that was holding me from that is my temps. I am pretty happy with 2.9 for now though.
I did not know this. I will run it tonight. Thanks.Quote:
I would also run Orthos at Priority 9 minimum and preferably Priority 10 to get a more accurate gauge of stability.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjeffreys
You need ihs off and Big Typhoon instead... much cheaper way to go... but yes water will give you some mhz more.
If I go this route I am definately going to go ahead with water. I personally just don't like the idea of a Naked CPU with a heavy CPU crusher on top for just a few degrees loss.Quote:
You need ihs off