ASUS Maximus II Formula - new P45 king?

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

03-05-2009, 04:03 PM
humeyboy

The NB/SB Temps should be fine on newer samples, I have no issues and Mobo is a good few months old now.

Someone here knew the serial numbers to look for but by now you should get a good one.
03-05-2009, 05:07 PM
Grnfinger

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeBar

Could u pls give us any more info?

I tried for starts running CPU and NB Clock Skew on normal, and needed to set vCore at 1.38 for 4.2GHz, so new chip and all I started tweaking ( 500 FSB still evades me ) I set CPU and NB skews to 100ps and lowerd vcore, it passed. set it to 200ps and lowerd, it passed again. 300ps and lowerd it failed, up'd vCore to 1.325 @ 300ps on both skews it passes linpak and prime.

Now on to NB volts, started with NB GTL set to auto, set ram at 1121MHz with vNB set to 1.39

DRAM Static Read Control: Enabled
Dram Read Training : Enabled
MEM OC Charger : Disabled
Ai Clock Twister : Stronger
Transaction Booster : Manual

Common Performance Level [8]

CPU would pass but once I brought the memory in to play it would fail.
So I upped NB volts to 1.45775 and it would pass anything I tossed at it.
Set NB GTL's to +30 and I could lower vNB to 1.41, anything lower and it fails.
If I run 1:1 PL10 I can drop vNB to 1.30 and pass all day long. I like the improved bandwidth 1121 offers and I'm on water so the extra volts are not an issue.

Will test further this weekend, this time of year my job has me pretty busy so has not been alot of "free" time for me.
03-05-2009, 10:14 PM
pphx459

Thanks for the advice, will try that this weekend. :)
03-06-2009, 04:47 AM
Grnfinger

Latency is crapola but teh bandwidth is rather decent.

http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/f...4250_Q9650.png
03-06-2009, 12:58 PM
JoeBar

Thanks for sharing your findings Grnfinger! :)

BTW, why do u have mem oc charger set to enabled? Try with it disabled and check your mem scores.
03-06-2009, 01:46 PM
Grnfinger

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeBar

Thanks for sharing your findings Grnfinger! :)

BTW, why do u have mem oc charger set to enabled? Try with it disabled and check your mem scores.

It is actually disabled its a typo from another template I posted.
I will edit the post.
03-07-2009, 01:31 PM
pphx459

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeBar

Thanks for sharing your findings Grnfinger! :)

BTW, why do u have mem oc charger set to enabled? Try with it disabled and check your mem scores.

Why wouldn't you have mem oc charger enabled?
03-07-2009, 01:46 PM
Grnfinger

Quote:

Originally Posted by pphx459

Why wouldn't you have mem oc charger enabled?

Because it limits bandwidth
03-07-2009, 02:16 PM
Simonix

sorry, so the last and better mod bios is the 1901.201 ?
03-07-2009, 05:14 PM
529th

Well, managed to get into windows a 480fsb & @ 46min into prime blend...
03-08-2009, 05:26 AM
Nevin

I want to ask is there someone with 8x560 or 8x570 stable, I need to see some settings.
03-08-2009, 06:16 AM
Evil_AnAnAs

I have a huge problem with this board... When I use 1,7vcore it fine but anything above that will make the system failing. It dies when I get the "overvoltage protection bla bla bla" I can get into bios and there when I monitor the voltage it's 1,9xv (when setting 1,74v). I'm using kets modded bios. Would a new bios help me?
03-08-2009, 07:52 AM
Grnfinger

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evil_AnAnAs

I have a huge problem with this board... When I use 1,7vcore it fine but anything above that will make the system failing. It dies when I get the "overvoltage protection bla bla bla" I can get into bios and there when I monitor the voltage it's 1,9xv (when setting 1,74v). I'm using kets modded bios. Would a new bios help me?

A new bios is definately worth a try, I have 1802 on bios1 and 1901 on bios2
Works great, benching setup for 1 and 24/7 setup for the other.
03-09-2009, 01:37 AM
CryptiK

Quote:

Originally Posted by Evil_AnAnAs

I have a huge problem with this board... When I use 1,7vcore it fine but anything above that will make the system failing. It dies when I get the "overvoltage protection bla bla bla" I can get into bios and there when I monitor the voltage it's 1,9xv (when setting 1,74v). I'm using kets modded bios. Would a new bios help me?

Try the latest BIOS, and try disabling Loadline Calibration if you have it enabled.
03-09-2009, 04:13 PM
edo

Hi guys, could you tell me some tips&triks to get my 9550 work @ 500 fsb ?

mi result up to now
(RS)

http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/1515/4150.th.jpg
03-10-2009, 02:21 AM
GeorgeVasil

Hello Guyz..

Ia am trying this settings..but i cant play PL8 + Strong or Stronger.:(

This Settings are prime stable for me.

8400+Gskill 8800PI+BIOS 1901.

Quote:

Ratio CMOS Setting: 9
FSB Frequency: 470
CPU Clock Skew: Auto
NB Clock Skew: Auto
FSB Strap to North Bridge: 333
DRAM Frequency: DDR2-1130MHz

DRAM CLK Skew on Channel A1: Auto
DRAM CLK Skew on Channel A2: Auto
DRAM CLK Skew on Channel B1: Auto
DRAM CLK Skew on Channel B2: Auto

DRAM Timing Control: Auto
DRAM Static Read Control: Disabled
DRAM Read Training: Disabled
MEM. OC Charger: Enabled
Ai Clock Twister: Moderate
Ai Transaction Booster: Manual

Common Performance Level: 8
Pull-in of CHA PH1: Disabled
Pull-in of CHA PH2: Disabled
Pull-in of CHA PH3: Disabled
Pull-in of CHB PH1: Disabled
Pull-in of CHB PH2: Disabled
Pull-in of CHB PH3: Disabled

PCIE Frequency: 101

CPU Voltage: 1.24
CPU PLL Voltage: 1.55
FSB Termination Voltage: 1.19
DRAM Voltage: 2.07
North Bridge Voltage: 1.32X
South Bridge 1.5 Voltage: 1.55
South Bridge 1.1 Voltage: 1.15

CPU GTL Reference (0): Auto
CPU GTL Reference (1): Auto
CPU GTL Reference (2): Auto
CPU GTL Reference (3): Auto
NB GTL Reference: Auto
DDR2 ChA Reference Voltage: Auto
DDR2 ChB Reference Voltage: Auto
North Bridge DDR Reference: Auto

CPU Configuration

Ratio CMOS Setting: 9
C1E Support: Disabled
Max CPUID Value Limit: Disabled
Intel Virtualization Tech: Enabled
CPU TM Function: Disabled
Execute Disable Bit: Disabled

Load-Line Calibration: Enabled
CPU Spread Spectrum: Disabled
PCIE Spread Spectrum: Disabled

Any idea to make it stable @Strong or Stronger?:(

Also,when you flash to 1901 BIOS,RAID ICHx status disappears :(:( ?
03-10-2009, 03:00 AM
CryptiK

You will need more vNB to get 470 FSB PL8 stable with strong/stronger.

I run 470 x 9 PL8 moderate 24/7 and it takes ~1.34vNB for total stability - HCI memtest really loads up the NB and at 1.30 - 1.32v I get errors before 1000% coverage.
03-10-2009, 04:55 AM
jason4207

Quote:

Originally Posted by edo

Hi guys, could you tell me some tips&triks to get my 9550 work @ 500 fsb ?

mi result up to now
(RS)

http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/1515/4150.th.jpg

I spent 4 weeks trying to get 490 stable. I can bench at 500, but there is no 24/7 stability. I gave up, and am running it at 471 now. I know I can go higher, but pushing the FSB to the ragged edge doesn't work well on this board. It's flaky and settings that were stable yesterday may not be stable today.

It looks like you're running small-fft. That's good for CPU top speed, but for testing the limits of the FSB I suggest you try large-fft. I think you'll see it fail much sooner and at lower FSB speeds.
03-10-2009, 06:26 AM
Rocks

I'm done with this board and it's crappy memory bandwidth/bugs and support. Just bought a Rampage Extreme. In case you are interested they have them here for dirt cheap:

http://www.priceguidenetwork.com/asu...e-extreme.html

Hope you guys get a good working BIOS. I will be selling my board on ebay within the next few weeks.

--Rocks
03-10-2009, 11:32 AM
529th

So I really haven't done too long of stability testing through p95 but I am at 480fsb
1.43v
2.10dram
1.10sb
1.55sb15
1.69pll
1.55nb
1.40vtt

did some np & cpu delay of 100ps and channel A & B 100ps delay; and a few other tweaks but before I get going on my UD3R board. I am wondering if 110f is too hot for my NB - I have active cooling by a 120x38mm fan blowing over the area but it still gets warmer.
03-10-2009, 02:17 PM
Grnfinger

110F = 43C
Thats not bad mine hits that after a few hours of benching and stability is there
Intel white paper states it can take alot more, I have found if you keep it under 50c or 122f your good
03-10-2009, 02:45 PM
529th

Cool, thanks :)

I have also have another question: what is the Ai Clock Twister? And does the UD3R have something comparable to this? Thanks :)
03-10-2009, 03:23 PM
edo

Quote:

Originally Posted by jason4207

I spent 4 weeks trying to get 490 stable. I can bench at 500, but there is no 24/7 stability. I gave up, and am running it at 471 now. I know I can go higher, but pushing the FSB to the ragged edge doesn't work well on this board. It's flaky and settings that were stable yesterday may not be stable today.

It looks like you're running small-fft. That's good for CPU top speed, but for testing the limits of the FSB I suggest you try large-fft. I think you'll see it fail much sooner and at lower FSB speeds.

i'll try large fft :)

yes it's quite hard to get 500.. probably with nexts bios we could get al least 494x8.5 for 24/7 :)
03-10-2009, 03:24 PM
529th

Quote:

Originally Posted by edo

i'll try large fft :)

yes it's quite hard to get 500.. probably with nexts bios we could get al least 494x8.5 for 24/7 :)

I wouldn't count on it
03-10-2009, 03:27 PM
Grnfinger

Quote:

Originally Posted by 529th

Cool, thanks :)

I have also have another question: what is the Ai Clock Twister? And does the UD3R have something comparable to this? Thanks :)

I'm no engineer so here is my best attempt to explain it.

Ai Clock Twister will tighten your sub timings increasing performance/bandwidth when set to strong or stronger
Moderate will run sub timing at or around stock
Light will relax them a tad allowing for improved overclocking.

Not sure what Gigabyte calls it or if they have it as an option in the bios.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page