1 of them could be real... :PQuote:
Originally Posted by Crankster
Printable View
1 of them could be real... :PQuote:
Originally Posted by Crankster
The first screenshot is real and the other are fakes... thought
i think the screenshot on the left side is real.
the others are fakes
cpulloverclock :
checksum's OK.
Very impressive oc.
Riverna :
fake.
cpu runs at 1927Mhz.
Was ein...... kannst du selbst mal ausfüllen. :D
Danke dir :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Jupiler
Das ist ja mehr als verkümmelt *g*
3 GHz ... ich hätte DIREKT ein Sempron gekauft würde es stimmen :cool:
Back with a better oc, all i need now is a decent psu and to figure out why connecting my LAN makes it reboot :confused:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crmk
Are there today just stupid people in the forum? The guy from ocinside with 3ghz and a other guy said he would have 13,6k with a x800se on 520/560 with 8 pipelines. After 1 hour and a lot of postings and links to the futurmark database the idiot said that the run was with 640*480 :rolleyes:
Sorry will kein Ärger bekommen deswegen schreib ich es lieber in Englisch :)
I think peoples lost there respect for other peoples. If u look at the 3 last pages,
there are so much faked results! Even people used Tom Holck's/Oppainter's
screens to pose in other forums... thats so cheap .. Can't understand that kind of peoples. :mad:
That's why it might be a good idea to put your name in the screenshot, so that some lamers can't say it's their oc.
Thats an good idea m8, but i'm always pray for the good attributes of the ppls.
But i think it's time to denote our screenshots! :-\
Edit: Anyone knows an good program to do this? MSPaint sucks, bcs. it's always
an white backround behind, when u write something. :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GravediggA
Photoshop, ofcourse. lol :p:
Hmm... maybe the GIMP? its free(unlike photoshop. im gifted with a copy from school). :toast:
K, thx. i will try Gimp. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by dippyskoodlez
Please and thanks
verified and checked, passed perfectly.Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperDude
NC 3200+ @ 2700Mhz
:D
Looks OK.Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwi
Please use CPU-Z version 1.26 and post a screenie.Thx.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kiwi
Thats so ... sorry ... funny.
Over 1,8 V for 2,7 GHz ??
I have 2,7 Ghz with 1,5 V ... that is 0,3 V less
Don't know what's so funny about that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Crmk
Not every cpu will overclock the same, with the same voltages. Some will need more juice than others. It's all a matter of luck, don't foget that. ;)
okay thats right but ... he need a vcore mod to take this clock ;)
it's not funny thats right, sorry.
He need no Vcore Mod! Thats an Newcastle and with some Mobos u can giveQuote:
Originally Posted by Crmk
+ 1,85V without Mods! :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GravediggA
my old newcastle runs with 1.9V on 2666Mhz :stick: I love the Winchester and the low Voltage :toast:
Sure, i like the lower voltages of the winchesters too, but i said, that it is no problem to give an Newcastle above 1,8V without any Mods on ur motherboard! U should know that anyway! ;)
Can anyone varify this one. 14 x 200mhz - stock voltage. 3DMark01 stabile for now.
Thanks :)
Tek, both checksums match the displayed clock speed.