Seems like a lot of people are measuring it quite a bit larger than that, like this guy on the AT forums.Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
Printable View
Seems like a lot of people are measuring it quite a bit larger than that, like this guy on the AT forums.Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
it is wrong comparision photo, try this one:
http://cdn.videocardz.com/images/201...CB-Picture.png
The Tahiti board is closer to the camera in that shot. I compared the size of the memory chips on both boards twice to be safe and Tahiti's were larger both times. Your comparison photo is flawed.Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
Does it look like the core is still resessed i cant tell?
I really hate that and would hope that its flat on these.
You were bouncing all over the place... even within this last week you were not very well informed.Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
Cant tell on this photo. But there's more place and not the angle corner.Quote:
Originally Posted by cowie
Nice summary there. I must say "owned" :DQuote:
Originally Posted by LordEC911
At first glance, I think it's a good card but I am not interested at all because i have the new Monster HD 7990 in my case :up:
But I think the price is high? right.
HD 7970 GHz Edition= $500
R9 290X= $650
Backup link can be found here
I think we've seen these results before but thank you Olivon:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
A bit early for discuss the price... i have see some speaking about 599$ ( launch price ).Quote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
Original link is downQuote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
But the latest information according to videocardzQuote:
Originally Posted by Lanek
Attachment 131330Quote:
One other thing. The fastest Radeon R9 290X might cost $650 USD, that’s the latest information on the price.
Aha Thanks:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
Follow the link of Olivon ....Quote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
I dont know the price myself... so i cant say it is one or the other.. just saying price differ depending the source.
LordEX91 - i have better ones to you:
no, Hawaii is still on 28nm, but more SPs and higher clocks will reach Titans performance level (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post5201760)
ahh, see. OK, it can be specs of "Pro" version maybe, successor of HD 7950.Because i thought full chip is only for Professional graphics. Full hp has 44 CUs, but who knows if will be in gaming SKU? (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post5203199)
and some members here can prove, i have 2816/176/512-bit info from august - thru the PM debates, but who cares ... your are better:
~440-480mm2 and roughly the same clocks, maybe a bit lower, should be enough and many, many more nonsense from you here, as always and in all threads.
Nonsense? How so?Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
Is it not accurate?
Only one to say that AMD was releasing a new GPU this year after the Feb interview (Q/A) and that Kaveri will show this year after all those delay rumors.
Saw my post in that link mentioning they should be able to eek out ~30% more performance at roughly the same power. I thought the die would be bigger though, 420mm for those specs seems small.Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
No way these bandwidth numbers are correct for Hawaii. Should be higher...Quote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
And I am guessing this TDP is for 800Mhz core clock. I really wish both companies stopped this boosting nonsense. Marketing...
Also, it's sad to see that $650 USD is the new norm. Remember 5870 was sold for 399? 4870 was sold for 299...
Exactly.Quote:
Originally Posted by PedantOne
Attachment 131332
It says it might cost $650, that chart has ~ and ? on it, what makes you think the number after the $ symbol is any more accurate?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
maybe will be 320 GB/s??Quote:
No way these bandwidth numbers are correct for Hawaii. Should be higher...
I agree with you:up:Quote:
And I am guessing this TDP is for 800Mhz core clock. I really wish both companies stopped this boosting nonsense. Marketing...
probably in the near future we will see a Graphics card (single-GPU) cost you $800-1000$:eek:Quote:
Also, it's sad to see that $650 USD is the new norm. Remember 5870 was sold for 399? 4870 was sold for 299...
I believe they have take the 780 price and transfer it.. and there's a good reason, from a market perspective, if its faster, AMD could have think they can adapt their price to the market .Quote:
Originally Posted by Iconyu
Now, the 780 and 770 have not really sold well, and AMD could have a sweet spot price around 600$, in reality, its most likely 599 $ .. a nice sweet psychological spot..
Then they could decrease the price to 550$ and certainly still got decent margin.
The second thing is AIB will come with their own models really quick after this release ( mid october for what i have heard here and there, maybe some even faster ), so dont charge to much on reference cards, the non reference cards will not hit the 700$ line .. ( 599$ reference cards.. 629 to 659$ for non reference ).
The third thing is Nvidia could react pretty fast and decrease the 780 price.
and what makes you think the number after the $ symbol inaccurate?Quote:
It says it might cost $650, that chart has ~ and ? on it, what makes you think the number after the $ symbol is any more accurate?
The word 'might' in your quote...Quote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
I think it will work the same way as with 7970 / GTX 680. Nvidia will drop prices following AMD's new release, just like AMD dropped price of 7970 when GTX 680 came out. Hopefully!Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanek