Printable View
Yes, the 2000 C7 are a complete tri-channel kit, the first 2200 C8 were a dual channel kit- the single green 2200 C8 stock seems to be older, SPD says 30/09, the dc-kit spd says 11/2010- maybe you are right, I havenīt had the time for extensive testing yet, but the stick does well, doing 1116 at 1,63 on first test on funcztion with memtest 86 to see if it works:)
They are all MGH-E even green PCB.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
Good to know, so best shot today I would say 2133Mhz C8 for $180
I was scared that only a few of them are mgh-e
If I were to purchase a kit of the ST hypers which one should I pick?
2x of these:
http://www.ewiz.com/detail.php?name=...2GB-CL7-Memory
or
1x of These
http://www.ewiz.com/detail.php?name=...nel-Memory-kit
Which do you think would give me a better overclock? Have the PCB's been straightened out? I'd prefer a black PCB?
Is there a 3x 2gb that's better binned? I'm running AMD but I wouldn't mind picking up a 6gb kit if it'll net me better performance. The third stick would come in handy to when I get around to playing with an i7.
get the 2x 2GB 2200C8 http://www.ewiz.com/detail.php?name=...nel-Memory-kit
From what i've seen of folks GTX2 results they are about 25-50mhz better than super talent 2200mhz on each cas 6, 7, 8 setting at the same voltages - but for most folks price would be determining factor. 6x2GB Super Talent 2200C8 at US$650 including shipping to OZ vs 6x2GB Corsair GTX2 2250C8 at US$1,500 excluding shipping costs. Difference in price you could get a 240GB Sandforce SSD or 2x 120GB Sanforce SSDs for raid :D But if you need every ounce of performance for record breaking probably would need GTX2 :)Quote:
Originally Posted by websmile
Well, maybe you are right, I havenīt had DDR3 Corsair because the performance on DDR2 was terrible and I refused to waste my money at ram which was that expensive- but as said I am very satisfied with my STT- heres a quick test, Rams are Memtest86 stable at these settings, but my IMC/Board combi limits me in windows with straght timings:(
http://www.abload.de/img/2000c7114032m163v54lz.jpg
Baby arrived
It can pass trough test 5 @ 1680Mhz C6-6-6-19-25 1.63v
or 1750Mhz 6-6-6-19-25 1.70v
Definately better then my old Dominator GT 2000 C8
http://i48.tinypic.com/9tzl79.jpg
http://i46.tinypic.com/v33fyd.jpg
Your results make me want to ...punch things.Quote:
Originally Posted by Barr3l Rid3r
Is that totally stable? I can do 32M and stuff at 1766.
Why? the results are about the same as yours.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
totally stable in memtest but windows 7 sux , I cant boot @ 1766Mhz 6-6-6-18-24 w/ 1.70v but I could @ 1840 7-7-6-19-25
But I can run cinebench @1733Mhz 1.70v w/ DMM on the IC leg, HWmonitor and bios tells me that is 1.65v (is ther any voltage loss from the VDDR RM leg to the memory IC?
*wipes sweat off forehead*Quote:
Originally Posted by Barr3l Rid3r
Great. :yepp: :rofl:
Had a feeling those clocks were stable in windows.
EDIT:
Not sure about that voltage loss thing. If your board is ov'ing by .05v I'd be concerned.
hehehe, I think our problem still beeing the IMC...Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
It's overvolting since it cames out of the box, 1.75v gives a killer 1.80v hehehehe
I'm not sure I'm measuring the right spot but it changes when I change the VDDR.
What are you able to get with CAS 7? You've got Thuban. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Barr3l Rid3r
I got an 790fx board also, maxxed out at 1876Mhz Cas7-7-6-19-25 1.74vQuote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
anyway my new 1095T sux, I could reach NB 3100Mhz w/ 1050T and cant get anything stable after 2900mhz w/ 1095 now... but unless I can use my ram better now.
You do mean 1090T, right? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Barr3l Rid3r
If you are thinking of letting either of those two go let me know.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
Why?
they still available at ewiz.
but I will sell one of the kits.
actually 2 of them (1 of STT and 1 of Dominator), but will be priced as gtx2, Brazilian custummer is very crude 60% !!!
Am i missing something? because 6/6/6/19 is good but my gt's can do 6/6/6/17 @ 1760??? im not sure what im seeing so special? i know these are cheap but hey..
Im at old 790fx w/ crappy 1090T IMC EPAWQuote:
Originally Posted by Johnny87au
yours are 1600 c6?
playing at cas7
http://i47.tinypic.com/zwnx5g.jpg
This is starting to get really fun
http://i50.tinypic.com/2jcuc5t.jpg
Check AMD section for some stuff I just released. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Barr3l Rid3r
barrel rider, nice :up: what bios? f8k?
Yes definately, f8J is a trash, F8H is better but CNQ always on, gonna revert later.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomasis
going thereQuote:
Originally Posted by BeepBeep2
anyone try these sticks on a ud7 or ud9 perhaps running @ 1700? i wanna see how tight these can go, im guessing 6/6/6/17?
yes 1700 6.6.6 should be no problem on any board :shrug:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny87au
I dont get it, what Dominators do you have? u told that 1760Mhz 6-6-6-17 was fine than. Wich board?
Since I donīt know an UD9 for AMD you might mean Intel- I had the 2200Cl8 on an UD5 with an i860, at 1,66V they are Memtest stable around 1750 6-6-6-16 1T with Auto subs, Performance on Turbo- need a small amount more V(about 0,02V) than my 2000 ProjectXQuote:
Originally Posted by Johnny87au