ATI Radeon HD 4000 Series discussion

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-17-2008, 01:29 PM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by gojirasan

Let's see how they behave themselves when they have the lead again. We'll have to see if they give us great prices out of the kindness of their hearts. I'm in for a 4870x2 on release day for sure. It looks like it's going to kick some serious tailbone. Maybe we'll start getting back to the old days of 6 month releases like clockwork and vicious competition between Nvidia and ATI (AMD). But I wonder what AMD would do about a 55nm GTX295 GX2. Now if AMD could just catch up to a company like Intel, who hasn't been sitting on their arses for the past year waiting for them to catch up we could be back to competitive markets for CPUs and GPUs.

mmmkay, i'm gonna go be sick :confused:

ATI, NVIDIA = Companies

they don't give a banana about you, they'd kill you for money if they could get away with it
06-17-2008, 01:29 PM
w0mbat

Quote:

Originally Posted by ORBR

[...]
and
pixel fill rate test 5.49 GP/s

more than 16 ROPS????

No, just 16 ROPs w/ 4Z/clk @ >100GB bandwidth.
06-17-2008, 01:32 PM
AliG

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kai Robinson

Then i suggest you actually stop being a blatant flaming fanboy and go to the Video Cards section and read the 4850 review for yourself.

Who's that directed at? If that's directed at me, I'll give one chance to apologize, because you can ask anyone around here and they'll tell you I've been around this thread from the start and definitely have learned a lot more about the rv770 than any new comer calling others "flaming fanboy"s

Quote:

Originally Posted by w0mbat

No, just 16 ROPs w/ 4Z/clk @ >100GB bandwidth.

guess its true about the ROPs being far more efficient
06-17-2008, 01:35 PM
y2kbos

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kai Robinson

Then i suggest you actually stop being a blatant flaming fanboy and go to the Video Cards section and read the 4850 review for yourself.

Point me too a direct comparison between HD4850 vs 9800gtx then
06-17-2008, 01:36 PM
Cooper

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides

mmmkay, i'm gonna go be sick :confused:

ATI, NVIDIA = Companies

they don't give a banana about you, they'd kill you for money if they could get away with it

lol dude - you watch too many movies :D
06-17-2008, 01:37 PM
Kai Robinson

It was aimed at y2kbos.

And i'm not just some n00b that wandered in off the streets you know. I have been doing this far longer than i've been a member of XS for. You definitely have some complex though, if you take that attitude towards someone who's comments aren't aimed at you in the first place.
06-17-2008, 01:37 PM
DilTech

CF 4850's look strong, that much is certain, but I fear micro-stuttering is still around and until I see a unanimous confirmation that it's fixed(not just a few forum members, as there are some who claimed it didn't happen with the 3870x2 as well) I still can't claim it a viable solution either.

Fact is, I have a buyer for my 8800GTX next month who needs a new card as he's still rocking out my old 6800GT(which still works as it did on launch), and am keeping a very close eye on how things develop with ATi as well as with NVidia. I'd point him in the direction of something else and just keep the card, but if I can spend a little more and get something much better, why not, as he insists on buying my card specifically.

So I'm watching this thread very closely at this point. ;)
06-17-2008, 01:37 PM
Genius_pt

60% of improvement means that hd4870 should be almost as powerful as hd4850 cf :eek:. Hmm, thats too good to believe...
06-17-2008, 01:38 PM
Sly Fox

Quote:

Originally Posted by Genius_pt

60% of improvement means that hd4870 should be almost as powerful as hd4850 cf :eek:. Hmm, thats too good to believe...

It would kill any demand for a 4850X2 as well. I'm sure ATI would prefer for that not to happen.

Unless the X2's this generation scale obscenely well all the time at least, that's a nice pipedream :rofl:
06-17-2008, 01:40 PM
Stuen4y

I hope tomorrow comes the single 4850 tests and all the mystery around this card goes away :).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly Fox

It would kill any demand for a 4850X2 as well. I'm sure ATI would prefer for that not to happen.

Unless the X2's this generation scale obscenely well all the time at least, that's a nice pipedream :rofl:

Have the confirmed 4850x2? I don't think so:). They need x2 card only for the high end and for prestige :).
06-17-2008, 01:44 PM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cooper

lol dude - you watch too many movies :D

lol, I wish

I am in a very well connected business network,
nearly all my friends are habitual but the few non-HE guys admit they'd do anything for their businesses
06-17-2008, 01:46 PM
ORBR

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly Fox

It would kill any demand for a 4850X2 as well. I'm sure ATI would prefer for that not to happen.

Unless the X2's this generation scale obscenely well all the time at least, that's a nice pipedream :rofl:

or maybe there's no 4850X2 at all...
;)

other scores... the 280 seems heavly powned..

GTX280
SM2=5439
SM3=4653

4850 CF
SM2=5770
SM3=6109
06-17-2008, 01:51 PM
Kai Robinson

With the results i'm seeing, i'm about ready to jump ship and get a pair of 4850's....should see me through until all the nehalem rush has passed!
06-17-2008, 01:52 PM
Sly Fox

Quote:

Originally Posted by ORBR

or maybe there's no 4850X2 at all...
;)

Possibly. I'd imagine some partner would make one though. Even if ATI doesn't lay out a design for one themselves. I mean, Asus made that crazy 3850X3 Trinity Super Ultra Insanity FTW Edition card :D

You know the one I'm talking about, with 3 3850 GPU's on one big board that you have to watercool.

Granted, I doubt it will ever actually be sold to the public, but the idea of a 4850X2 is a little less weird. So who knows eh?
06-17-2008, 01:54 PM
y2kbos

Quote:

Originally Posted by AliG

If that's directed at me, I'll give one chance to apologize, because you can ask anyone around here and they'll tell you I've been around this thread from the start and definitely have learned a lot more about the rv770 than any new comer calling others "flaming fanboy"s

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kai Robinson

It was aimed at y2kbos.

And i'm not just some n00b that wandered in off the streets you know. I have been doing this far longer than i've been a member of XS for. You definitely have some complex though, if you take that attitude towards someone who's comments aren't aimed at you in the first place.

:rofl:

One chance or what?

lmao @ AliG
06-17-2008, 01:59 PM
eleeter

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly Fox

I mean, Asus made that crazy 3850X3 Trinity Super Ultra Insanity FTW Edition card :D

Best name ever. :yepp:

Ancient proverb say, don't open whoopass can if other guy has bigger can.
06-17-2008, 02:02 PM
Dan_c

:rofl::up::ROTF::clap:
and 9600 Matrix :D
way better than longbow chik!

anyways, red team needs the X2, at least for pub sake, and I think they know that....
06-17-2008, 02:06 PM
DilTech

Quote:

Originally Posted by y2kbos

:rofl:

One chance or what?

lmao @ AliG

I'm giving you ALL one chance to drop the argument... I've let this go on long enough. Next response to your off-topic discussion gets reminded that we do infact have moderators at this site...

Get back on topic, stop the "ATi are t3h fail" nature of your posts in this thread. Consider this a public warning, not just to yourself, but to EVERYONE who might get the same idea in their head that this is ok to do. ;)
06-17-2008, 02:13 PM
y2kbos

Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you by experience :D

I will keep my views for another thread boss
06-17-2008, 02:25 PM
gojirasan

Quote:

Originally Posted by eleeter

Best name ever.

+1

Quote:

Originally Posted by DilTech

CF 4850's look strong, that much is certain, but I fear micro-stuttering is still around and until I see a unanimous confirmation that it's fixed(not just a few forum members, as there are some who claimed it didn't happen with the 3870x2 as well) I still can't claim it a viable solution either.

Where can I find out more detailed info about this "micro-stuttering" that I keep hearing about? Any videos that show it?
06-17-2008, 02:27 PM
Beefy22

Quote:

Originally Posted by DilTech

CF 4850's look strong, that much is certain, but I fear micro-stuttering is still around and until I see a unanimous confirmation that it's fixed(not just a few forum members, as there are some who claimed it didn't happen with the 3870x2 as well) I still can't claim it a viable solution either.

Fact is, I have a buyer for my 8800GTX next month who needs a new card as he's still rocking out my old 6800GT(which still works as it did on launch), and am keeping a very close eye on how things develop with ATi as well as with NVidia. I'd point him in the direction of something else and just keep the card, but if I can spend a little more and get something much better, why not, as he insists on buying my card specifically.

So I'm watching this thread very closely at this point. ;)

I personally can't comment on the validity of such claims(BTW not calling you out), since I have never owned a multi GPU setup... But is microstuttering as prevalent and noticeable as people have made it out to be? Another question, with only 512MB of GDDR3 would 4850s CF'd choke when subjected to 19x12 res, AA, AF and a texture heavy game? I'm not trying to flame anyone, I'm just curious as I have never owned a SLI/CF multi gpu rig but am quite tempted ATM considering the 4850s price point...
06-17-2008, 02:31 PM
mascaras

Quote:

Originally Posted by ORBR

+60% sulla 4850

512MB GDDR5 version ?!?!

http://www.tweaktown.com/popImg.php?..._4850erly2.jpg

regards
06-17-2008, 02:31 PM
Hornet331

Quote:

Originally Posted by ORBR

+60% sulla 4850

HD4850 vs HD4870 :

Xtreme preset :

HD4850 vs 4870

GT1 : 8.62 - 12.57
GT2 : 7.13 - 12.72

FT1 : 651.67 - 779.86
FT2 : 3.41 - 5.49
FT3 : 18.11 - 20.58
FT4 : 14.23 - 17.02
FT5 : 27.59 - 33.58
FT6 : 48.92 - 53.73

GPU Score : 2692 - 4316

http://www.tweaktown.com/popImg.php?..._4850erly1.jpg
http://www.tweaktown.com/popImg.php?..._4850erly2.jpg
ATI on steroids!

and
pixel fill rate test 5.49 GP/s

more than 16 ROPS????

so it confirms 32tmus, but only 512mb frame buffer.... :(

1gb version need asap. :yepp:
06-17-2008, 02:50 PM
STaRGaZeR

Quote:

Originally Posted by DilTech

CF 4850's look strong, that much is certain, but I fear micro-stuttering is still around and until I see a unanimous confirmation that it's fixed(not just a few forum members, as there are some who claimed it didn't happen with the 3870x2 as well) I still can't claim it a viable solution either.

You'll always get micro-stuttering in CF, because it will still use AFR and you have two complete and independent cards. The only thing that could be new is the 4870X2. Will test both CF and R700 when I can, but I can bet MC will be present at least in the CF solution. R700 remains to be seen ;)

4850CF is no different from 3870CF, so if you're looking for the power of two without the problems of two wait and see what R700 can do (or can't do, who knows).

BTW impressive results of the 70 if true, but I'm with Hornet, 1GB cards NOW!
06-17-2008, 03:02 PM
LowRun

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuen4y

Can someone give info what are the prices in the already listed cards in Europe?

250 Euro for 4870? 175 Euro is much higher price than the first predicted ~230$, but to be honest the card worths every cent :).

This looks more promising :) and the "prediction" of ~230$ is right:).

Starting as low as 155€ here and in stock, given the pricing track record of that shop i'm expecting you'd be able to find some in the 140€ range in a few days.

http://www.grosbill.com/index.php3?id=76848&site=clubic

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page