Verified ... P/N ends at AA4T here too !Quote:
Originally Posted by X-GeN
what about yours trans am?
yeah! lets just enjoy them :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by enzoR
Printable View
Verified ... P/N ends at AA4T here too !Quote:
Originally Posted by X-GeN
what about yours trans am?
yeah! lets just enjoy them :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by enzoR
look at the 1st set of pics I posted. It's clearly the same AA4T My ic's end with 44DQuote:
Originally Posted by esdee
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...chmentid=22023
i think ill try a stick of that PC2700
if newegg's picture is right then that AA4T... only the IC's are 60d... hmmm 6.0 ns maybe? they still seem to be the UTT blanks so maybe they are just lower rated same chips? i wonder how consitent the lower rated ones are with thehigher rated ones.
I think that it isn't coincidence that the chips that didn't do very well previously in this thread's date end with a D while the good chips end with a 4.
and that there is another S/n that ends in AADT (one on TwinMOS's site, techPowerup!'s review)...
Could this be that this reoccuring 4 is signaling that these are BH-4? (probably not, but i have to come to a conclusion from my findings)
could it be something other than bh-x or ch-x?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEDY
yes, but thats the AADT, as gulp pointed out, seems like the AA4T is doing better.
i wouldnt think of them as bh or ch anything, id think of them as winbond UTT.
and gulp im not really seeing what your saying, seems to me the XXD chips are doing just fine.
edit - i see now, its AA4T instead of 44DT... hmmm
Just ordered a stick of this twinmos stuff, its all too interesting not to give it a shot. :cool:
The 44/50/60 number on the chip itself is not related to the AA4T vs 44DT on the product number (which is on the sticker and not the ram).
Both the PC2700 and the PC3200 have modules with the product/part number ending in the AA4T...which appear to be the ones we all covet.
Coveting will bust your bank account, you know.
So is the consensus then that even though they are PC2700, they are worth a shot if they are of the AA4T variety? I have PM'ed the fella at OC Forums asking to check the product number but have yet to receive a response. He said his store had nine of the 512MB sticks in stock.
im going to order that PC2700 tonight, just gathering up a few other things, the PC3200 for the same price is AADT so im going to give the pc2700 a try, getting 2x256...
if this outclocks my 2x256 BH-5 that i bought from mushkin for $130 last month im going be pretty happy....
i might even pick up 2x512 if thats the case.
trans am can you run the everest memory latency bench ?
im just too curious to see what lower latency the 4.4ns chips have over my 5ns (if 44D and 50D means that)
I think you are doing right by going with the PC2700 and the AA4T part # over the PC3200 with the AADT ending number.
I'm waiting to hear about the sticks from Fry's and will post any info that I get on them. Hopefully before you order (just in case). Of course, you wait too long and those will be sold out as well. :)
from my understanding thats not how the latency rating works, from my understanding, lower latency ram has more clock potential... everest latency rating depend on clockspeed IIRC
edit - yeah im still looking for a good online shop for VR's so you got some time yet...
OT anyone know any good online shops for VR's? :p:
Which Fry's are you looking at? I live near the one at Fountain Valley and Anaheim. Do you mind telling me the part numbers because I won't be able to look at the memory until I purchase it.
hmmm you might be right ... but lets see what the output will be ... just for testingQuote:
Originally Posted by Revv23
Trans-Am if you do this do it @max (267 for you) and @240 (like i did)
/edit revv23 take a look at that latency and bandwidth !
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...97&postcount=7
He lives in florida so its no where around here. But damn the twinmos is looking really nice right now.Quote:
Originally Posted by quicksilverXP
Earlier I posted (within a page or two) a link to PC2700 at newegg with the M.tec chips and the picture shows the parts number (which ends in AA4T).Quote:
Originally Posted by quicksilverXP
I live in Florida and I've never seen a Fry's but one of the members at OC Forums is an employee at one of the stores (don't know which one) and he works in the "cage" area so during a slow time he went through the ram and found 9 of the 512MB PC2700 sticks. He was going to buy one and test it and then get back with me and a couple of the other guys with results. I am still waiting to hear back.
They probably did so darn good that he will tell me that they sucked and he'll end up keeping them all. :)
Just kidding...I turned him on to this thread and this ram so he offered to get me some as his cost if they worked out. We'll see how it goes.
So A-TT good chips ?
Man.. I would like to know more than anything how 2x512MB clocks. I know 2x256 will yield higher results, but 512MB isn't practical anymore.
Quote:
Originally Posted by quicksilverXP
I have two sticks coming tomorrow or thursday. ;) My current processor is only good to about 255fsb so if they handle that memtest overnight stable i'm gonna grab an ole faithful 2.4c to see what clocks these sticks will get.
never tried ths but is it possible to run a 533NB strap and a greater the 1:1 divider?
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...218-057&depa=1
That is the link at newegg to the PC2700, however, while looking it up I came across something that will be of interest to those that ordered the PC3200 Speed Premium in the 512 sticks. Those don't have the AA4T, but instead have the AADT coding at the end of the parts #. They may not be the Winbond UTT chips, according to the information that has been posted here today. Hopefully the re-stock will use the Winbond chips.
this was 9x267 and 9x240 single channel. Bigtoe's shows 42.2 at 260mhz. on the same board. he is 2-2-2-0. mine is 2-2-2-10. also I have everything after tras on auto. He might be a64 tweaking. This is on windows xp with pretty much everything running. no tweaks here.Quote:
Originally Posted by esdee
Here you go.....
http://xtremesystems.org/forums/atta...id=22090&stc=1
http://xtremesystems.org/forums/atta...id=22091&stc=1
Where else could someone find these chips? I know the TwinMOS is preferable becasue they use the brainpower PCB, but would these be on Kingston or other brands' value memory?
What should I be looking for if I go Looking?
Since Winbond made these for Infineon to begin with, you would think that you could find it in their ram (the sound you here is that of a thousand overclockers headed for newegg again as we all go off looking for Infineon based ram). Alex (of TwinMOS) stated it was in Kingston and other value ram and a picture of some KVR was posted around page 4 or 5 of this thread, but so far no one has actually spotted it elsewhere. Of course, I know that I've been fixated on TwinMOS myself and could have easily overlooked another brand (other than KVR which I have looked for).
What you are looking for is the well known and easily recognized Winbond chip design (without their logo).
These are Infineon...
http://www.newegg.com/app/viewproduc...150-614&DEPA=1
look at the product page at buffalo. It shows infineon (ending with "ic" suffix)
http://www.buffalotech.com/products/product-ddrdimm.php Nevermind, I called Buffalo and they don't match the criteria. Buffalo's out.