EDIT: that post was way too pissy sounding....
i will buy based on my needs, not what you believe my needs are. thank you.
Printable View
Additionally from what I have seen Tri SLI seems to be the fastest solution.
IF SLI gtx 480 are sometimes beating a 5970 by 60 percent as in anandtech review(and at the very worst beating it by 15 percent, with an average about 40 percent), tri sli is bound to win even against a pair of 5970 . And they happen to more or less cost the same, although you might need a big power supply(and if was me I would use atleast
1 water block on the center card).
Also for some, 3d gaming might be another reason to go with NV. 3d everything is taking off and AMD doesn't have anything setup in this regard.
I have a question my monitor is a 24inch samsung lcd tv 1080p if I get the 4xx in sli can I connect them with my hdmi cable to my tv? will I get audio?
somebody asked if the evga blocks are any good.
i saw that they use swiftech blocks on the 470, which at least look very very nice... they even have a heatsink for the pwm which is connected to the main block via a heatpipe! sounds very nice... and their 470 with waterblock costs 499$, the same as a 480... but really, the 470 doesnt make much sense imo... check out the 470 ocing results we have so far... even a 750mhz 470 is 10% behind a 480 at 700mhz... the missing mem bandwidth and texturing power seem to have a big impact on perf... with a vmod the 470 should be able to reach 480 performance... but you need watercooling to keep it cool, and you end up spending the same as a 480, lol... so watercooling a 470 doesnt make too much sense imo...
1920x1080 without dx11 = 4850 or gts250 = 99$
1920x1080 with dx11 = 5850 = 299$
2560x1600 = 5970 or 470 sli = 700$+
the 480 and 5870 dont make sense at all unless your benching imo... :shrug:
in the end you pay 200$ for dx11... is that worth it? definately not if you ask me... sure, a 5750 does dx11 as well and costs a lot less, but its too slow to actually play games with dx11 enabled and full details... its somewhat a compromise option but it makes more sense to spend a bit extra and get a propper dx11 card imo.
tons? samsung, acer, alienware and acer... and they are based on the same panel, the only difference is the plastic bracket and stand.
correct me if im wrong but those are the only 3d displays i can find...
i like 3d... a lot!... but im waiting for 240hz 3d displays before i actually spend that much money on it...
can anyone answer my last question.
Not that experienced with SLi, let alone pass through audio on the Geforce cards. However, I would be almost certain that using the SPDIF pass through from soundcard/board to whichever 4xx card you'd have as the main display driver would allow the audio to still pass through in SLi. So yes.
I agree with you guys but I mostley play Arma 2 and I need all the power I can get.But that was not my question I wanted to know If I will be able to use the gpus threw a HDMI cable and get audio and video.
correction, id go for a 3d display as soon as theres one that can do 200hz... 100hz per eye is enough...
i just came back from the cinema seeing the dreamworks 3d dragon movie and... wow... as soon as the camera moved, even at a slow pace, the whole scene began to flicker and everything blurred.
some scenes made my eyes water, and not cause they were emotionally touching lol :D
Probably easier to make it work properly with games, since they have all the 3D data and render it when you want to see it. Some movies can be "converted" into 3D after they are mostly done, which obviously introduces the problem of really only having a 2-dimensional source to work with.