Whatever method you use to flash you need to clear dmi.Quote:
Originally Posted by MajestycX
Printable View
Whatever method you use to flash you need to clear dmi.Quote:
Originally Posted by MajestycX
Quote:
Originally Posted by msgclb
Flash with diskette and load optimize defaults...
how to clear dmi?
thankss
Using Q-Flash you'll see an option to "Clear DMI Data", just reflash and CPU-Z will show the right bios file.
CPU-Z 1.38 : http://www.cpuid.com/download/cpu-z-138.zip
* VIA P4M890 and P4M900 chipsets.
* NVIDIA 650i and 680i chipset.
* AMD Athlon 64 FX-7x processor.
* Core 2 Duo E6850, E6750, E6650 processors.
* Socket 775 Xeon processor.
* New parameters "-txt" and "-html" (see above for more details).
This is what I got when I tried CPU-Z 1.38.Quote:
Originally Posted by doGus
Attachment 53213
Edit: It's now working. Thanks!
Same here msg, i just made a post about it. Thought i was the only one and related to the beta bios i am using.
I had the same experiences with the F8I beta bios for the DS3 using my pentium d 920. It acted the same way when overclocking. I flashed back to F7 production bios.Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dower
Edit....I should mention that I can't run any memory dividers except one (3:4) 2.66 . It wont even post if I set the memory at anything other than 2.66. That started at F7 I believe....can't be sure about that.
Same here... :nono: cpu-z 1.38 :nono:
[QUOTE=msgclb]This is what I got when I tried CPU-Z 1.38.
QUOTE]
It seems to work fine with F7 and a Presler 920.
My bad. But it's fixed now, please download it again.
Richard, crop that damn picture will ya'? It's huge!Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dower
Thanks for the preliminary. I haven't had a chance to try it yet, but will advise asap.
Odd, I just downloaded and unzipped it on my machine. It's coming up fine with no error and showing proper information about my cpu. But it does list my 6400 as a conroe rather than allendale.Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dower
Thats cause they just updated it :)
Finally with bios f8i dont pass 900mhz my Team Xtreem DDR800....
the issue continue....and not fix with new bios :(
Please PM me your components and settings.Quote:
Originally Posted by MajestycX
You need to go to the Dark Side and change out your memory. :D Actually, I have your exact memory modules now, will test it tomorrow.Quote:
Originally Posted by JPH1589
Sorry GAM, i'm not great with making pics...how does one resize?
F8i has been great for me.
Running my G.Skill HZ @ 1125mhz 5-5-5-12 2.3V
Previous Max on F8a: 900mhz 4-4-4-12
F8i new max FSB: 530mhz
Old Max, F8a: 475mhz
I guess the good thing waiting for offical F8 for DS3 is the JMicron bios ROM will be updated.
My E6300 is Conroe or Allendale?!!
http://www.persianpcshop.com/1.28.jpg
Richard : use ACDsee to corp images
Somebodynew : Great!
Again any newer BIOS over F7b for DS4?
Basically a conroe with 2mb cache disable... intel found out that some cpu have a bad 2mb cache and so they disable it. that's how ur allendale was born :PQuote:
Originally Posted by HamidFULL
means Allendale was incorrect from first?!
yes er... no it's a conroe with the name allendale lol! shesh... i forgot where i'd read that article, i'll pm u the webbie if i found it =.="
"All Conroe processors have 4 MB L2 cache; however, the E6300 and E6400 versions have half of their cache disabled, hence they only have 2 MB of usable L2 cache.
The lower end E6300 (1.86 GHz) and E6400 (2.13 GHz), both with a 1066 MT/s FSB, were released on July 27, 2006. Traditionally, CPUs of the same family with less cache simply have the unavailable cache disabled, since this allows parts that fail quality control to be sold at a lower rating." from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Core_2
Wolfdale, dual-core, 45 nm shrink of Allendale, with 3 MiB L2 coming next? btw anyone here have a xeon 3060 yet? does it run on the ds4 board?
btw from that screenshot your conroe is on multiplier is on 6x instead of 7x default if you care.
As HamidFull stated, almost all the I.D. utils were incorrect in their naming of the E6300 and E6400. As you can see in this document even Intel named it Conroe. So they have corrected the "problem" now.
And they aren't broken 4MB cache chips, the cache is delibirately (spelling?) disabled while there's nothing wrong with it. Just marketing purposes, if the E6400 can be overclocked as high as the E6600 there would be no advantage over the E6400 anymore for the E6600. And this way the bigger price difference gets justified, also if someone would really NEED the 4MB they have to go for at least the E6600. If there were E6300 with 4MB they wouldn't get the extra money Intel wants from you:fact: .