What seems to be really scary is that he posts that the HD6970 is consuming more power than GTX480.....
Printable View
What seems to be really scary is that he posts that the HD6970 is consuming more power than GTX480.....
hmmQuote:
Originally Posted by Borden
35% faster in Metro2033 puts it above GTX 580 according to Anandtech, and 44% faster in Stalker COP puts it around if not above GTX 580 as well. Guru3D seems to corroborate those #'s.
For that matter, AvP is faster according to techpowerup. For Lost Planet 2, according to Tom's, 6970 is at 5970 levels, though that one's so heavily Nvidia favored nothing non-Nvidia is close
Like I said, pay attention to the game benchmarks more than what 3dMark is spewing out
I read the graph as in xx% better at tesselation, not in framerates or gameplay, but I could have just misinterpreted it.Quote:
Originally Posted by zerazax
You mean HD 6970 :)Quote:
What seems to be really scary is that he posts that the HD6870 is consuming more power than GTX480.....
but this is bad man :down: , I have a bad feeling about this card HD 6970 :shrug:
Look at the botom, seems pheik...Quote:
Originally Posted by zerazax
I do
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/4097/gpuzneuvxukz.jpg
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
That's what I thought too, but look at the graph.... tessellation rate is consistently > 1.5x, usually over 2x, so why would they do that tessellation graph then show tessellation in games not doing so?Quote:
Originally Posted by 96redformula
And it's neck to neck with the 5970 in tessellation in Unigine so the 69% performance sounds about right
Han solo " I got a bad feeling" strange, it feels I never see her again.
Trust him.
Its all in the force.
mixed bag, likely bad optimized drivers as far.
maybe crossfire will suck for a year then.
6970 is supposedly rated at 190 typical / 250 max, so in some situations, I wouldn't be surprised if it got close to the 480 - but I bet overall average is a different story, much less firemarkQuote:
Originally Posted by 96redformula
He's done that to every slide /shrugQuote:
Originally Posted by WintersSC
I think you posted good stuff so i wanted to remind you that these factors dont go unnoticed by everyone. Most people that agree with you just dont have reason to write about it here.Quote:
Originally Posted by zerazax
I think expectations to Cayman from some people are just dumb. Why would amd all the sudden throw that well working "sweet spot" -strategy to trash bin? To please five enthusiastic gamers who wants amd to make huge cost-inefficient chip that would rape GTX580?
My guess about that "turbo-boost" button is that its dual-bios switch. In a way it can works as turbo-boost if other of the bioses has been updated to more aggressive clocks. This way one could update "reserved slot bios" with less risk and switch to primary bios if something goes wrong. I think there motherboards that has this feature? But this is just a wild guess as i dont really know anything about bios-stuff :)
Thanks. Love the avatar too :up::ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by ilkkahy
It's apparently a dual BIOS switch - one which raises max voltage and is meant to avoid the cold bug. Interesting that they decided to put it in a reference card
HD6970 RE5 Benchmark posted!
8xAA 1920x1080, all max 16xAF
http://www.abload.de/img/6970re5dban.jpg
Ouch :doh:Quote:
Originally Posted by zerazax
FFS hicksetto, just for 1 second xDDD
most waterblocks are for the reference card to start anywayQuote:
Originally Posted by zerazax
Um is that good, bad....RE5 bench people translate please :).Quote:
Originally Posted by Hicksetto
Didnt say anything XDQuote:
Originally Posted by 96redformula
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/369...rd/index5.html
*cough* 8xAA 16xAF *cough*Quote:
Originally Posted by WintersSC
Someone just mentioned the 480 in his review was undervolted to 0.963VQuote:
Originally Posted by 96redformula
5870 Crossfire 8xAA and 16xAF scores 109FPS on RE5 Fixed benchmark
GTX 580 8xAA and 16xAF scores 117FPS on RE5 Fixed benchmark
According to this http://hardforum.com/showpost.php?p=...0&postcount=19
Not too shabby at all
GTX 580 bench didnt use filters or? I dont see that condition in the screen :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by zerazax
My bad, sorry!Quote:
Originally Posted by kite7
@Ducati750
Quote:
Depends. Resident Evil hab ich jetzt mit der gtx480 gebencht und komme auf 101FPS, die 6970 hat 109FPS. Resident Evil, I just benched with the GTX480 and come to 101FPS, which has 109FPS 6970.
Bei meinem F1 2010 Bench ist die 6970 21% schneller als gtx480. On my bench, the 6970 F1 2010 21% faster than GTX480.
Bei 3DMark11 Extreme ist die 6970 auch schneller. In 3DMark11 the 6970 Extreme is faster.
I'm sure they didn't enable AA or AF for that RE5 bench because they did a separate test in their review labeled "High Quality AA and AF"Quote:
GTX 580 bench didnt use filters or? I dont see that condition in the screen
okey! Im new in this world xDQuote:
Originally Posted by kite7
See what I told you guys? so much doom and gloom.. and 6970 is awfully close to the 580Quote:
Originally Posted by 96redformula
Also, for reference, the Computemark score of 454 sounds bad compared to the 580
http://h-5.abload.de/img/6970computemarkxmc9.jpg
But look at what the 5870 scores:
http://www.geeks3d.com/20100606/gpu-...80-vs-hd-5870/
238!
The 6970 scored 90.7% higher than the 5870 in the same compute bench!
Oh god, this seems to be good, despite the 10.11 drivers...