Let's hope the price drops a bit, 975 is quite steep. 800 would be okay.
Printable View
Let's hope the price drops a bit, 975 is quite steep. 800 would be okay.
Why would NVIDIA launch a product on a federal holiday in the States? The 18th is President's Day.Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenTiger
The claims are getting more and more ridiculous it seems. "Confirmed owners"? "I know someone who has a card"? Come on now.
Does sound a bit ridiculous to me... (the 18th). I was just copy-pasta'ing what the cart claims.Quote:
Originally Posted by SKYMTL
GeForce Titan like a president....
GeForce Titan......BIG DOOOGG:D
After seeing a few specs being thrown about I figured I should share this:
Big ? is though, if the already available gk20x/gk110 is the same chip as the gf110...Code:K20x K20
Stream Processors 2688 2496
Core Clock 732MHz 706MHz
Memory Clock 5.2GHz GDDR5 5.2GHz GDDR5
Memory Bus Width 384-bit 320-bit
VRAM 6GB 5GB
Single Precision 3.95 TFLOPS 3.52 TFLOPS
Double Precision 1.31 TFLOPS (1/3) 1.17 TFLOPS (1/3)
Transistor Count 7.1B 7.1B
TDP 235W 225W
Manufacturing Process TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm
Architecture Kepler Kepler
ROP 48 48?
TMU 240 224?
Dynamic Parallelism
Hyper-Q
Grid Management Unit
NVIDIA GPUDirect
Improved L2 Cache
I'm guessing it is, it's just weird though that the geforce card comes out after the quadro variant, it's strange because normally it's always vice versa.
The 680 really seems that it was a mid range card all this time ^^, at least to me it seems it was.
I totally wasted a bunch of money on the lightning 680 when I should of just waited it out just a few more months.
Ohwell, gonna be needing the new one now since the 680 pukes with AO or SGSSAA, or 3d vision (can't really game much at all with 3d vision's performance being 1/2 to 1/4 the speed of normal).
ues these specs fits a card that is the true successor of 580
I call shinaniganz on the 235W claim... Minimum 250W for a 550mm2 chip.
Remember that these cards aren't going to make use of tessellators or anything else that is only used in a graphics pipeline, as well as being clocked somewhat conservatively.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimitriman
I have not heard anywhere that Titan will be cut off from its GPGPU/tesslator portions like the 680, in fact I heard the opposite? That the card will bring way more compute power to the table to beat 7970 on that end as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by hurleybird
It would be stupid move for NV to have 580 beat the crap out of next two generations in gpgpu..
Ah, my bad. I thought you were talking about K20X.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimitriman
it has already been reported here?
http://www.overclockers.ru/hardnews/...nchmarkov.html
The card in the pic is a K-series part, not a GeForce product.Quote:
Originally Posted by Handrox
All the info is old and has already been proven wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Handrox
New blurred pic on WCCFtech ....
:/
It's another fake, Nvidia doesn't use such VRMs. Looks like Zotac or MSI Lightning (possibly heavily photoshopped, but maybe not... I found a few similar looking PCB shots already :p:).Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie-revhead
That picture looks terrible lol...Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie-revhead
-PB
Yeah my first thought was it looked like a Lightning, not that I would know ... Imagine Nvidia turned to MSI to design it .... never happenQuote:
Originally Posted by zalbard
:D
me Today 07:35 PM
you Today 08:12 PM
too late :D
Your link doesn't work, his does. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal
That is a lot more believable score, which makes me think that it is correct.
lol :DQuote:
Originally Posted by zalbard