Ahm, 256k.
The K7 already head 128k L1 cache...
Printable View
This is very exciting. If I'm not mistaken, this is the first we've seen of early silicon. Considering the launch for this product is supposed to be well over a year from now, I hold this as a good sign.
yes, its really Bulldozer:eek::up:
That screenshot looks like a gold statue while ati 58## look like broken window.
28m l3 cache? Also according to cpu-z isn't it a multi-socket, 32 cores maybe?
lol, and here i was thinking its a mangus shrunk....
nice AVX catch!! But if its early silicon that means changes can be made i hope noting too drastic. Also if this is Bulldozer i am a bit sad on the performance 38% more with 33% more cores i was hoping for more...
EDIT Sorry wrong calculations....
CAN ANYONE TRANSLATE THIS:-
{
稍後將顯示更多的中國走出去
新藥實際上是到2011年 所以不能顯示太多
}
This was written under the pic!!!
25% more cores. 38% more 3% less clock so it can only go up actually.
if it where 33% more cores then 24 core mangus
15% faster cores vs mangus.
if it where 25% more cores then 24 core mangus
52% faster cores vs mangus.
my math sucks lol
to get 67.424 or close to it I needed 1.58 X from 42.727.
its good for performance in wprime. Watch at Nehalem vs Westmere, clock for clock about zero up...
See what i found
http://images.hardware.info/news/opteron_april09b.jpg
So where does 16 core AMD fit, INTERLAGOS in 2011 sadly its MP but at least its G34 is INTERLAGOS suppose to be bulldozer???
I wonder if it has cmt like rumors would cpu-z still read it as 2 cores when its more like 2 threads?
Maybe SMT will be implemented later, this maybe a early silicon and can be modified to suite AMD's needs and preferences !!!
I thought 32nm for AMD is only available by 2H 2010! Interlagos should be Bulldozer. They promised Bulldozer by 2011.
salt anyone?
Me me, well i mean it can be the bulldozer and a early silicon that means that these specs are not air tight there will be most likely be changes brought at a later stage and thinking of one possible outcome as a final result is kinda not wise.
So have a little salt and u will not be sad when bulldozer has 20 Mb of l3 instead of 28mb
That L3 size, 128KB L1's, AVX Instructions, 32nm... put some SMT technology and it's Bulldozer for me. Interlagos?
I think we should not highjack S7's thread. To discuss that create a separate thread please.
http://cpu.rightmark.org/download/rmma38bin.rar
The multi-threaded sub-test should run as many threads as possible,and
can do read/write per thread (custom size) -great for ganged-unganged modes.I am guessing there should be "minor" improvements in the
bandwidth "department" ;)
http://cpu.rightmark.org/download.shtml
Salt please.That website is a known one for faking results before. BTW it's too early for Interlagos samples,especially for the ones that supposedly ended up in hands of some Chinese PC enthusiast.
I suppose Steven's thread was a bit derailed.
Yes, please!
I know that being pessimistic is less favoured here, but I always thought that this early in development (over 1 year before launch) if there is a working silicon, then it will be hidden deeply in AMD U.S. labs for internal validations. Not in OEM hands somewhere in far east.
Just look at Intel leaks, they are maximum 6 months before official product launches, that's when OEM's and ODM's are getting their first samples for validations.
I wish AMD would by this far ahead with Bulldozer, but I can't rationale that ATM.
use translator from japan to english and we will see... :) Think,its not fake
I want to see s7's 3d runs:up:
Its a fake