3GPU run the physX benchmark, the min fps is 20! Genius!
Printable View
3GPU run the physX benchmark, the min fps is 20! Genius!
[QUOTE=Talonman;3961883]Post some screen shots with fraps, take V-Sync off, and I will do the same tonight after work. :up:
QUOTE]
?
Yep, No Dare involved to my eyes...
It did make your story better though. ;)
Do get back to us on if you also can change that file, and reproduce his results. Getting 100+ FPS with level 2 PhysX running on a Q6600 would be BIG!! :)
C:\Users\Administrator\Documents\Eidos\Batman Arkham Asylum Demo\BmGame\Config\Userengine.ini
[Engine.Engine]
PhysXLevel=2
Language=int
[DevOptions.Shaders]
bAllowMultiThreadedShaderCompile=False
I did and it was the same as set to high in the launcher, ie around 50 FPS avg at 1600x1200 and AA4x (with physx enabled in nvidia cpanel, otherwise the ~13 FPS). I think changing AA mode didn't affect fps with physx enabled but could check again, I'm pretty sure I already checked that.
BTW, what settings did you use for that startales benchmark, I did a quick run with that as well at 1280x1024 with 16x AF and no AA and HDR and DOF enabled and got 23.xx sth minimum FPS on my GTX 260, average was like 61 tho.
1920x1200, just started it up and hit run I believe...
I can't remember for sure as I did that a while back.
So what's happening exactly? mao5 is claiming 100fps with CPU physx?
That is what he is selling me? (100+ actually) ;)
He has a hobby...
opps...
Here are my settings for the StarTales Benchmark RPGWiZaRD...
http://www.evga.com/forums/tm.asp?m=568129&mpage=3&key=
bottom of the page. :D
AA4x with physX on had a negative affect on the performance, around 5 FPS / 10% compared to off which clearly points the PhysX is being handled by the GPU as it should. However it still personally baffles me how AA4x with PhysX set to off in the game settings allows for around 30~35% performance increase, that's just nuts if you ask me.
EDIT: Spoke too soon, now it seems to work as it should, but I swear it didn't do it before.
1280x960 AA off vs AA 4x
------------------------
http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2...009081h.th.jpg http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/6...2009081.th.jpg
1600x1200 AA off vs AA4x
------------------------
http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/8...009081i.th.jpg http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/8...009081b.th.jpg
Thread killed.