I think most ppl hit the wall at 260.
Beyond that its 1m superpi only.
Mine still has very few errors at 260 but i can run superpi 1meg a little over 270.
Printable View
I think most ppl hit the wall at 260.
Beyond that its 1m superpi only.
Mine still has very few errors at 260 but i can run superpi 1meg a little over 270.
I managed to run 32mb at 265 but was slower than at 260??
When was the last somebody received TwinMos SP 3200 512mb from Newegg? Looking to pick up another stick since price drop. Mine is 44D just wondering what Newegg has in stock now.
its still the good stuff there, aa4t 44d's
My Twinmos SP w/ AA4T 44D from overclockers.de do 268 2-2-2-6-7-15-2-2-1-1 1T memtest 20 passes without errors at 3.6v.
They also do 270 with 3.7v and same timmings, but I have 2 errors by pass in memtest #5, but it is prime estable anyway...
:toast:
TEDY, nice of you to share how much is CFM ;)
lol that was just conversion so that i know for my fans :P
Got my pair today through the post!!!!! :toast:
So i've got
1 Gig of Twinmos SP 3200 AA4T 44D
1 Gig of Twinmos SP 3500 1A4T 44B
Still waiting for a psu & my hd to be delivered!! :mad:
TEDY i've just noticed on your chips it doesnt say BH5, but on mine they do :confused:
At least that will add $$$ to the value, if i sell them
I still don't think there's going to be a damn bit of difference in the chips at high volts with 2x512 sticks... ch-5 vs bh-5 I mean, someone prove me wrong, I would like to see better results from bh-5...
But the BH chips will do 2-2-2 at lower voltage than the CH since CH really likes 2-3-2 and not 2-2-2.
so basically they perform the same at high voltage but bh has the edge at lower voltage? My AA4T sticks will do 250 1.5-2-2-6 with 3.2v. This is just as good as my bh-5 (Kingston HyperX).
Are you referring to the old BH-5 and CH-5 or the new UTT's?Quote:
Originally Posted by cartmanea
That may have been true with the old dies, but there's lots of UTT-CH that's hitting 250+/3.3v/2-2-2. :confused:
When I say UTT does better at higher voltage I mean over 3v. UTT is untested CH chips, there is also new BH in production. So, UTT still performs like CH-5 did, at lower voltage it can only do 2-3-2, but give it 3.2v+ and it will do 2-2-2. Granted, they may have made improvements since we are seeing 250+ fsb, but A64 is definitely helping there. I had some SP UTT and it topped out around 245 at 3.3v on my NF7-S.
Mine does 255MHz, 2-2-2-x, with 3.2v with ease.Quote:
Originally Posted by cartmanea
ALONSO said they made some mistake in China...3200 should be CH-5 UTT but mine are BH-5 for sure....Quote:
Originally Posted by Owen1978
or else they wouldn't be working 200 2-2-2-5 at 2.5v :D
It maybe this has already been posted here, but:
Duonger - a Mushkin rep - shed some light to this whole UTT-chip case in this post @ OCForums.
I have had four sticks of the new SpeedPremium 3500 w/BH5 for two days now.
Max OC in single channel config (stick no.):
1 262MHz
2 253MHz
3 250MHz
4 246MHz
------------------------------
In dual mode (128bit)
approx. 235MHz (doesnt matter which stiks is used)
------------------------------
All the tests where run at 3,5V@2 2 2 8 1T
4 full rounds in memtest86 w/no errors = "test ok!"
DFI nF4 Ultra-D w/3000+ winnie
Personally, I think your Winnie memory controller is a POS. You should be seeing better dc results than that. Maybe a Venice in your near future?Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcticOC
Dual channel and memory controller issues aside, seems like the individual test are no better (maybe worse?) than the average Twinmos SP 3200 512mb (CH) stick results. I was expecting better from BH. This is not encouraging. :( 3.5v seems like plenty of vitamin V.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcticOC
Yup, agree with the poster above. I have a TwinMos SP UTT stick supposively with ch die and does 260htt easily with 3.5v. Haven't really burned it in yet but not sure if the ch burns in like bh die. Should have a few more sticks of AA4T from Newegg in a few days. Will post my results.
well they did say originally that ch-5 was supposed to better bh-5 but the original process didnt go to good. Now they perfected the process and ch is really better than bh. Now we just have to wait for DH moduals.
Just burning my Speed Premium BH5 in at 245Mhz 2-2-2-5 3.5V, at which it is 20 passes of memtest 5 stable. It wouldn't do 250 out of the box at any voltage, and I get errors using 3.6V or more, hopefully burning in will sort that.
Looks like the CH5 might be the better bet.
I got my two sticks of 1A4T as well today, and it definitely says BH-5 on the chips. I decided to put them both in at stock timings, stock fsb and stock voltages (2.5-3-3-8 , 216Mhz , 2.7v) just to make sure that they work at all and I get lots of errors in memtest #5. I even upped the voltages and relaxed the timings but still errors :( Surely it doesn't need burning in to work at SPD settings right?
Did anyone else bother to test at stock first before overclocking?
Note, on the same PC I have just taken out some TCCD that ran 100% stable at a much higher FSB!
Ps, Minsta, glad to see you've taken a brief timeout from your dissertation to get us some results, yours are looking good - unlike mine :( Also, I've rated your review over at Komplett "useful" :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by [timko]
Same problem here. My sticks need 2.9v to run 216Mhz SPD. Really disappointing. Shame on Twinmos :mad:
The legend is back? Yeah.. right :rolleyes: