ey I been reading about this heat pipe mod. I bought the ceramique to do it, but I'm just wondering is it going to kill my board at 70c on load. I beleive 100c is safe, but maybe I've forgot. Please remind me what was safe for PWM.
Printable View
ey I been reading about this heat pipe mod. I bought the ceramique to do it, but I'm just wondering is it going to kill my board at 70c on load. I beleive 100c is safe, but maybe I've forgot. Please remind me what was safe for PWM.
Actually I think they are specked around 125c there abouts top end
I mentioned to you already to leave the thermal tape over the PWM area on to compensate for compression!
Ace-a-Rue and I have been troubleshooting a lockup problem that I have been having. He made the suggestion that I try installing Windows Vista without using Raid 0.
On a side note my Raid array has been underperforming. I would have to enable Volume-Write-Back cache in order to have the true speed.
Well now I can't install Windows on a hard drive. I removed the drives from the array, and set the SATA mode back to IDE. I also fixed the boot order as well as the order of the hard drives. Vista sees only one hard drive, but the BIOS sees both drives. (they are on ports 3 and 4) I tried to install on that one hard drive but Windows said that it couldn't install on that drive. I also tried the AHCI mode, but I got a similar error. I reset the BIOS but still no luck. I can't seem to know what the problem is. :shrug:
i wouldnt say 100c is safe by any means, its more like the max ya wanna be at.
I mean to hit 100c i would have to be outside in vegas running my rig
ideal on idle 36c, load 60-70c. remeber most of the time your pwm wont be hot as the sun. unless you constantly run primes or other benches
Windows shows a drive called "Drive 1 of Partition 1 - 298GB of 298GB" It is set to primary.
Where is my other drive? :confused:
I try to press next but it says, "Windows is not unable to find a system volume that meets its criteria for installation."
What the heck. :shrug:
Thanks, :)
It's nothing like that... I know what he's talking about. Vista 64 bit wouldn't let me install on one of my raptors when I used it solo but it let me install on a raid 0 volume :confused: Also when I was trying to install on a solo drive, it didn't show the other drives. Some kind of glitch that google can probably help solve :rolleyes: too lazy :p:
are you sure that your drives are not infected with any virus...which virus program are currently using?
like the poster above me mentioned...you can write zero's to the front and back of the drive which does not take very much time...if you do the whole drive, it is an all nighter!;) ...we are talking a limited low level format...i think seagate's tools allows for that
Primary and active are not the same. The partition also has to be the active partition. When I made the partition for my Vista install I set it to be a primary partition like you normally would. After numerous attempts, deletions and repartitioning with the Vista disk, and always getting the same error, I booted back to XP. Using the disk management utility in XP I happened to right-click the partition, which was already labeled as primary, and saw the option to make the partition "active". I rebooted back to the Vista install disk and installation went on this time without a hitch. I am now courious as to how my XP partition is set. I will go and check and post back.
I don't normally run Seagate drives, but I know I wiped at least one before so they do have bootable software. They may call it ‘wipe’ or ‘low level format’ or ‘write zero’s’. They all call it something different but it is all the same thing. Vista seems to be very fussy about a pristine HDD.
If you didn’t remove the drives from the array in the Intel RAID Option ROM they will still have info on them indicating they are part of an array. If the software has the option to format the MBR do that too. Some software has it, others don’t.
That sounds like it should but it doesn't. Been there, done that. It might if it was only 1 partition. I went back to XP and took a ss of my drives in Disk Management. Please noticed how they are labeled. My XP install is showing C:\ and is labled as a System drive by XP. Then notice how the Vista drive is labeled "Active" as is the 4g flash drive that Vista uses for ReadyBoost. I fought this same thing for almost 3 hours until I changed the partition to Active. Then Vista installed fine.
i agree with your previous assertion that you do need to make the partition but it is not necessary to make it active...i just went through all the scenarios...
as long as the drive is partitioned and it is seen as "Disk 0", vista will install on it...what "knight" has to do is unplug the drive that he does not want to change...that way vista will only see the one, single drive and it will install as long as the drive has been partitioned.
I just have to laugh. :D
Ok... well I was thinking what program I could use to format/zero my drive so that Vista could install. I then said... WTH.. XP does that. :p: I booted the XP disc and formatted the drives so that the partitions would be gone. I exited the XP install and placed the Vista disc in. It did the job. :rolleyes: :ROTF:
:rofl: nice job! :up: When I was installing from a solo drive, the drive wasn't formatted. I was expecting vista to format it. Even after I clicked format...nothing.