:D 1.0vid @ 1.33v -180c
Printable View
:D 1.0vid @ 1.33v -180c
Nice! Results!
@Splave nice :toast:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nazu
indeed even q9650@4.5ghz wasnt enough.. then again depends on the apps/settings usedQuote:
Originally Posted by bro20000
concentrated on getting the system stable and went up this high on ambient air/thermalright silver arrow/1.5vcpu
Q is will it be stable running the 580s @ high 3d clocks.. thats coming up
http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/8741/93262801.png
Nice result m8! Is that cpu on water now! Have been thinking of getting a 980x but sandy bridge is kind of putting me off!
thanx! no bro no changes still same cooler from above^ im not into watercooling dont have any cpu/gpu waterblocks
http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/8277/12780975.png
Nice overclock on air! I think i will get a 980x my cpu is letting me down! I can only get 4.3Ghz max! Had like 5GHz on water! When ocing the 580 there very cpu limited!
I bought an MSI 580GTX. It has a green pcb with a 1.03 VID but its not a good clocker. Stock VID with fan @ 85% can only do 900mhz 3D03 benchable...:(
Best I can do for now on air but the score seems low to me...thought I'd be much closer to 110K with these clocks.:confused:
http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/752...1121145015.png
Asus green and yellow pcb but 1.013v vid for both of them. Stockcooling 85% fan:
http://img545.imageshack.us/img545/5...agep463061.jpg
I'm intrested in gaming performance, not so much in Vantage or other benching programs.Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
look thru all of first post - i didnt remove q9650 resultsQuote:
Originally Posted by Nazu
in crysis 950mhz gpu single 580/aa 16xQ @ 980x beats 975mhz gpu single 580/aa 4x @ q9650
just an example like i said it depends on the game and settings
980x
http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/9809/53022104.png
q9650
http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/6775/34503351.png
thanx! yeah hawx2^ is a good example 5ghz 980x aint enough for sli 580 high clocksQuote:
Originally Posted by bro20000
sorry to hear.. what vgpu ? increase mem clock to 1100-1150 and youll get better score/sQuote:
Originally Posted by MTP04
very nice :up: keepers! :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by pinto
Very nice Allen :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
Using stock vid of 1.03v for my runs for now. Even with increased mem clocks I am still puzzled on how some people are getting higher GT3/GT4 scores on similar clocks.Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
An improvement but still not what I expected....something is missing.:shakes:
http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/9...1121190611.png
it could be your system memory what clocks is that at and timing!
Doesn't look too bad. Would be nice to see those gaming benches done at cpu clocks people usually have (something like 3.2GHz-3-6GHz) Not all of us have watercooling.Quote:
Originally Posted by NapalmV5
Very nice , 1.0 VID on LN2 is very strongQuote:
Originally Posted by Splave
Some benchmark at 3.8Ghz
Default 580 Clocks
[IMG]http://www.hostimage.co.uk/thumb-EEA7_4CEA51FD.jpg[/IMG]
900C/4500M
[IMG]http://www.hostimage.co.uk/thumb-805F_4CEA51FD.jpg[/IMG]
985C/4500M
[IMG]http://www.hostimage.co.uk/thumb-48E4_4CEA51FD.jpg[/IMG]
580 card scale really well!
I don't think its memory, I have it at 900mhz with 7.6.5.15 1T. Maybe its just that i7 is stronger in those particular game tests than my setup.:shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by bro20000
does this look like watercooling to you?? go poop on someone else if you got nothing better to doQuote:
Originally Posted by Nazu
http://img543.imageshack.us/img543/6779/77608708.jpg
Allen you need another 1.000vid and youll do a lot of damage :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by miahallen
thats low oh it needs higher vgpu than that v1.1xxQuote:
Originally Posted by MTP04
im not a 3dmark expert i just runem consecutively always
run it with nature selected only first and see you if get higher fps that way
runem all in certain order - check the 3d section
nonetheless you still need to increase vgpu/core/mem