Is it only me or do I see jaggies in the screens? I thought even the 4x ingame setting looked smoother.
Printable View
Is it only me or do I see jaggies in the screens? I thought even the 4x ingame setting looked smoother.
+1
So how is it he is running PhysX level 2 on his CPU, but getting better FPS than the rest of the ATI boys?
I have a feeling there is more 'customization' in his files than what meets the eye.
Too many instruction with odd laughs on every post. Is it the Joker?
I am unconvinced he is actually running level 2 PhysX on his Q6600, and getting 129 FPS. (Even at his 1680x1050 res)
So what is his secret? (How do the rest of the ATI boys get level 2 PhysX with 16x CSAA on their CPU, with 100 FPS?)
Do tell....
Instead of betting, answer the question...
(How do the rest of the ATI boys get level 2 PhysX with 16x CSAA on their CPU, with 100 FPS @ 1680x1050 res?)
No answer again... :welcome:
odd!
What do you boys think about his posted results?
other ati boys can enter the first cave near the cell get the same fps with 4850CF at level 2
So lets cut the crap.
What level of PhysX are you running on your CPU, and how much AA, to get your 100+ FPS.
Talonman where's your 1920 16xQ Veryhigh Level2 PhysX screenshoots?
You are good at assigning me tasks, but I cant get a straight answer out of you.
If your here to assign me busy work, but dont respond to my requests, we are done.
So you have no AA at all, running at 1680x1050 res, and the other ATI boys have to enter a cave to get good frame rates, and your trying to make me run 1920x1200 with 16XQA? WTF
Yep, you have convinced me that running that way is the way NOT to go.
Thanks for the post.
BTW where did you enable PhysX mao5? Because editing \Engine\Config\BaseEngine.ini and PhysXLevel=2 won't enable it at least. I just checked, got same FPS as with PhysX turned off in the launcher with PhysXLevel set to 2 in the ini file and clearly didn't see any difference.
Here's the case for me at 1600x1200 and AA4x:
PhysX off, average FPS is around 90 FPS
PhysX set to normal or high in the launcher: avg ~50 FPS
PhysX disabled in the nvidia cpanel (CPU does the job): ~13 FPS
btw, as I said, ATi cards can not do AA when run physX on CPU, you can let other ATi boys to verfy what I said. At least, my 4850CF can't do AA when PhysX level set to 1 or 2.
Not with the attitude, waves, and odd laughs, like 'I can run that too'...
If you just told me I cant run AA, have a lower res, and have to enter a cave to get good frame rates, we would have started out better I think.
And then telling me to select some option that isn't even in the game (16xCSAA), and run at 1920x1200, and post up my results as if it is some type of benchmark competition, just doesn't seem right to me.
what I like? I like to crack physx and physx boys in my spare time, for example don't you see this picture ?
http://bbs.pczilla.net/attachments/m...3893d3f232.jpg
just download the demo:
http://nzone.download.nvidia.com/nod...0330_final.rar
install it, then go install dire ->EngineConfig dir-> edit the BaseGame.ini
at [engine.worldinfo]
change the MaxPhysicsSubstep value from 5 to 1
that's all, no physics effects difference, :rofl:
Having no PhysX effects kind of defeats the purpose in a PhysX benchmark, don't you think? :shrug:
I would rather run with PhysX effects, with these frame rates, at 1920X1200 res...
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/5238/st1920bench.jpg
BTW - I never dared anybody, to do anything. Check your facts.