Intel i7 975 first showing Mikeguava/FUGGER

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

02-07-2009, 04:26 AM
Kensek

Quote:

Originally Posted by FoamGlass

Intel i7 975 ES D0 stepping
Gigabyte EX58-EXTREME
Gigabyte 4870X2 Quadfire (pure stock)
Corsair 1866C8 with Pelt cooling
K|ngp|n F1 EE Pot
750W Silencer PSU

Not meant to be dumb, but how is that possible?:D
Didn't fell any instability due tests?

My Kill-a-watt readings when benching with a i7 965 @ 4.3 GHz and 2 HD4870x2s Crossfired at 852/980 Peak at 840 watts during Vantage and 3DMark06.
02-07-2009, 04:30 AM
eva2000

If D0 runs cooler, it would be logically to say it uses less power too ?
02-07-2009, 04:35 AM
[XC] riptide

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kensek

My Kill-a-watt readings when benching with a i7 965 @ 4.3 GHz and 2 HD4870x2s Crossfired at 852/980 Peak at 840 watts during Vantage and 3DMark06.

Ya... But his cards were stock?

Quote:

Originally Posted by eva2000

If D0 runs cooler, it would be logically to say it uses less power too ?

Exactly.
02-07-2009, 04:53 AM
Foamy

Quote:

Originally Posted by Demo

I believe the entire system does not even draw close to 650watts, so 750watts still has plenty of headroom.

Hmm impressive, i was struggeling to get my system stable with 2900XTX2 and QX9650 plugged onto 850w psu. Guess i will have to re-aducate myself on current power draws :D
02-07-2009, 08:17 AM
[XC] gomeler

Quote:

Originally Posted by FoamGlass

Intel i7 975 ES D0 stepping
Gigabyte EX58-EXTREME
Gigabyte 4870X2 Quadfire (pure stock)
Corsair 1866C8 with Pelt cooling
K|ngp|n F1 EE Pot
750W Silencer PSU

Not meant to be dumb, but how is that possible?:D
Didn't fell any instability due tests?

A quality PSU can also occasionally draw more current than it is rated for :up: That's the difference between high and low quality, low quality will blow up before it even reaches it's rated power rating :shakes:
02-07-2009, 08:39 AM
Drwho?

Quote:

Originally Posted by ryba

Ok Fugger and Drwho? I can't blame you for anything. But, why when I'm asking Intel: When you will have 975 extreme and showing them this thread I have anwser: This CPU not exist and will not be in sellery ever!

This information I have from Polish part of Intel and they have it from much higher part of company.

And sorry, if someone from Intel telling and showing me something about 975 Extreme and second person from that company telling me that CPU will not exist, what can I think about Intel?:shrug:

as I said in the past, i did rename this part 975 by hand, I did not want to call it 965 because it is a D stepping, and it would have been misleading. (It was a mistake, in the futur, I will call them "Intel Proto")

For the moment, the product group does not want to give time line on the release of the D stepping, I am not even sure that it will be called 975.

There is confusion between technology demo and productized CPU. It is fresh from the Fab.
02-08-2009, 02:32 AM
SoF

wow just returned back from ski holiday and WTF thoose guys are never on holiday :p: GREAT piece of art! nice to see 47k falling :clap:
02-08-2009, 10:59 PM
Rise

that's awesome :up:

but can it run— nevermind :rofl:
02-08-2009, 11:00 PM
Movieman

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rise

that's awesome :up:

but can it run— nevermind :rofl:

only at the low settings!:rofl:
02-09-2009, 07:00 AM
TheKarmakazi

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drwho?

as I said in the past, i did rename this part 975 by hand, I did not want to call it 965 because it is a D stepping, and it would have been misleading. (It was a mistake, in the futur, I will call them "Intel Proto")

For the moment, the product group does not want to give time line on the release of the D stepping, I am not even sure that it will be called 975.

There is confusion between technology demo and productized CPU. It is fresh from the Fab.

Is there a general idea of release date? Q2? Q3? I just want to sell all my 8600's and 775 stuff before this comes out :D
02-09-2009, 07:22 AM
Drwho?

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheKarmakazi

Is there a general idea of release date? Q2? Q3? I just want to sell all my 8600's and 775 stuff before this comes out :D

I can't give away more than I did already ... There is a lot of cool stuff coming in 2009 ... don't worry, we are going to have fun.

Tomorrow is an other day, and each tomorrow has its own surprise. :rofl:
02-09-2009, 07:33 AM
CmB

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drwho?

I can't give away more than I did already ... There is a lot of cool stuff coming in 2009 ... don't worry, we are going to have fun.

Tomorrow is an other day, and each tomorrow has its own surprise. :rofl:

Hey, thanks for what you did give away:D. Looks like a fun year upcoming for benching!
02-09-2009, 08:30 AM
DMH

When does fugger run's a 06?
02-09-2009, 10:51 AM
dpa

my system peaked at 850w with cpu on air. with cpu at 4.8Ghz -100C the same system peaked at 800w. lower resistance? :D
02-13-2009, 01:04 PM
Yellowbeard

I saw a picture of the 2010 Ford Mustang yesterday....:yepp:

The carbon fiber Shenanigan intake is curiously pistol shaped :shrug:
02-13-2009, 01:06 PM
Movieman

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yellowbeard

I saw a picture of the 2010 Ford Mustang yesterday....:yepp:

The carbon fiber Shenanigan intake is curiously pistol shaped :shrug:

:rofl: excellent!:up:
02-13-2009, 01:18 PM
Hondacity

Quote:

Originally Posted by dpa

my system peaked at 850w with cpu on air. with cpu at 4.8Ghz -100C the same system peaked at 800w. lower resistance? :D

woah..what video card are you using? i wanna get the hx1000 but im not sure if it can run two gtx 295's
02-13-2009, 02:02 PM
dpa

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hondacity

woah..what video card are you using? i wanna get the hx1000 but im not sure if it can run two gtx 295's

2 x GTX295 with 965 @ 4.8GHz...
02-13-2009, 08:48 PM
mike

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kensek

My Kill-a-watt readings when benching with a i7 965 @ 4.3 GHz and 2 HD4870x2s Crossfired at 852/980 Peak at 840 watts during Vantage and 3DMark06.

Saw the same power draw

I'll try to talk Fugger to rerun tomorrow and if he's up to it we'll do some c1 d0 comparos
02-13-2009, 08:52 PM
mike

Quote:

Originally Posted by eva2000

If D0 runs cooler, it would be logically to say it uses less power too ?

didn't check but would make sense. Only thing I remember was that stock vcore and 1.48v appeared to draw only slightly more at idle.
02-14-2009, 05:21 AM
Anemone

Kind of surprised that the stock speed wasn't set to 3.6. That doesn't matter much to us, really, but I'm thinking of the image to a larger audience. I7's @ 2.93, 3.2 and 3.6 would be a more fitting lineup for a "premium" chip series.
02-14-2009, 10:18 AM
YukonTrooper

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anemone

Kind of surprised that the stock speed wasn't set to 3.6. That doesn't matter much to us, really, but I'm thinking of the image to a larger audience. I7's @ 2.93, 3.2 and 3.6 would be a more fitting lineup for a "premium" chip series.

Stock speeds don't mean much to our segment anyways. I think they probably don't go any higher because of heat output. They need to make sure the chips will work at stock in various scenarios, including a dust filled computer in the middle of the desert.
02-15-2009, 05:44 AM
AndreYang

@FUGGER

Why did you change the title? AMD did the same thing as you.

As their points, you can post 975 98 995 any Core i7 1366 any cpus because 1366 i7 is already launched last year.

Where are these claim's guys? Why not go to AMD's thread claim again?
02-16-2009, 07:17 AM
Johnny Bravo

Quote:

Originally Posted by AndreYang

@FUGGER

Why did you change the title? AMD did the same thing as you.

As their points, you can post 975 98 995 any Core i7 1366 any cpus because 1366 i7 is already launched last year.

Where are these claim's guys? Why not go to AMD's thread claim again?

It's like you're gunning for a ban Andre :confused: You've gotta let this go man!
02-18-2009, 11:06 PM
hipro5

Great WR guys....... :up:
Keep it up..... ;)

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page