first run with rampage extreme
c.f. 4870x2
e8600 435 cooled by nirvana
c.c.1800
t.t.1200w
all air cooling
vga 800/900
http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/32/40kkkeq7.jpg
Printable View
first run with rampage extreme
c.f. 4870x2
e8600 435 cooled by nirvana
c.c.1800
t.t.1200w
all air cooling
vga 800/900
http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/32/40kkkeq7.jpg
:eek2:
Wow! Wr?
GiorgioPrimo achieved 139K with a 5.6Ghz Quad + 850 Core 4870X2 Xfire.....so that is one amazing result to say the least 0_0 !!! :eek:
Perkam
which drivers did you use the cd ones or the 8.8 betas
Amazing score Antonio
:shocked:
Amazing, but a bit odd, when you compare with Giorgio's score. Either the score is bugged (seeing the subtest scores, I reckon not) or there's something we all missed.
nice work man, continue pushing it.
How much power on PSU do you need to push a CF of 4870x2 ? pretty good? 850/1000/1200?
BTW WR ? well done
Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
mmm dunno, maybe jsut a beta driver related issue, I used driver "sample" from ati, prolly SPl used the driver in the CD included on the box. Besides that he run a really high FSB .....
all those run are really preview run, ( included mine) , better comparison will be possible wen offical approved driver will be out ;)
It just keeps getting better :D
Im off to the shops this week ;)
Great run Antonio!!!:clap:
Not possible to run memory over 900mhz C7?
I really love the 1240+ fps in GT2:D:up:
The score is real, I got 118k with default cards at 4200Mhz..
Very good job spl! :)
With the newer drivers? If that's the case, AMD/ATI did a fantastic job :DQuote:
Originally Posted by over@locker886
I used , what I got with Asus cards. (8.52)Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
8.52.2?
I don't know exactly, gpu-z said: atiumdag 7.14.10.0603 /VistaQuote:
Originally Posted by massman
Catalyst 8.7 works well with CFX?
What tool you guys use for clock the cards?
TKS and sorry for the OT.:)
'03 has become a rather interesting and frustrating bench all at the same time, results all over the place with ATI's latest cards.
Nice one spl! :toast: :D
thanks to everybody
drivers 8.52 8.8 beta
Nice work my friends......:up:
You have used great combo, chipset latency Vs. Fsb and PL, very good job Antonio.
Ati plus Intel in this run is kill app 03marks :D:D
Temps all round?
Nice job :)
very very nice ...i can only manage 125,347 on air :
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=764072
Could you post your ram timings ? your CPU is only 100MHz more than mine and you have a 15k point lead :(
Congrats, this app is also some that suits the 4870x2s...
Keep pushing it
Those new HD 4870 X2 are killing me slowly , too bad they are not available here , i can't wait to get mine , congrats on your result .
guys here is a tip I was told
maybe the issue with some of your guys runs
a tip for cf/cfx
always always as soon as you boot to windows before you use amdoctool ;( always start say am3 to inilizize 3d dispaly driver for 3d on EACH CORE
then exit am3 right away 'or let it finish if your not straped for time'
then and only then set card clocks for 1-2-3-4 cores
I bel this was the prob with some variations in 03 and so on wiht the 3870x2s in cfx
so like i said post to windows
run a quick am3 or run 01 nature 'any 3d' then exit asap and then set all clocks and every 3d with cfx/cf will have the RIGHT #'s everytime
thanks, i have noticed that even if I set the clocks in CCC, GPU-Z doesnt pick them up.
Hopefully new drivers and a new rivatuner will sort the problem out !
Awesome result good work :up:
update
cpu is on the limit (air)
n.b. olso (air)
http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/5042/141kes7.jpg
That is the one insane e8600 you have. This must be the new wr...
For aircooling I think it is :DQuote:
Originally Posted by ahmad
Congrats :woot:
Perkam
Hey... please.. how much power in the PSU to push two card? jejeje...
im using a tagan 1300w for both of mine and my qx9650/e8600
real nice run! with some cold that will blow 150k away :eek:
Quote:
Originally Posted by spl
That crazy score ...............:eek::eek:only with air cooling :up::up::up:
c.c.1800 very good 800mhz 6-5-5-15-1t
http://img393.imageshack.us/img393/9199/800nc9.jpg
33k 2005 air cooling
http://img393.imageshack.us/img393/7231/33kfs6.jpg
Vantage Xtreme Preset Pls :D
Perkam
congrats that's one fine E8600 you have :)
what was the room ambient temps ?
amazing, unbelievable!!!
Remember, the rampage extreme allows for "on-the-fly" CPU boost during the benchmarks. It can be boosted during more GPU-intensive tests, which is probably why he got that high of a score at only 4.9 GHz.
Anyways, I'm surprised that it can actually do 4.9 on air using only 1.46v, is that correct? What was the load temp with nirvana?
- New!?! Where I live the HD5870 have been on the market for mouths... ^_^Quote:
Originally Posted by makaka
Nah, itīs new... :ROTF:
OWOW!:up:
Any Setup Pics?
room temp.20degree celsius
http://img119.imageshack.us/img119/5...gine005ab5.jpg
Yeah nice. staff... one question. why do you connect the lcd to the second vga? more performance? samething like that?
i think its just the way it works, I have to on mine aswell
i try 8.8 official
singol 4870x2 full air 100k 2003!!
http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/7928/100kmz2.jpg
awesome result!
WTH !!!!!! :eek: !!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by spl
Congrats !!
Perkam
incrise little bit the vga and!!!
full air
http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/9435/337as7.jpg
http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/145/143kkwe0.jpg
Right now, you are the man. I can't imagine what it will do if you can hit 1000MHz on that GDDR5
Quote:
Originally Posted by spl
Are you have evered to meet a problem like this ?
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...53&postcount=2
if you have evered to meet, you have the way to corrects ? because I meet a problem like this for all driver (8.6-8.8)
if you have the way to corrects please tell me, thank you very much.
have you tried the 8.8 drivers ? they make a big difference
I have tried 8.8beta & 8.8final finished already,Quote:
Originally Posted by Olly_K
it is stilling get into trouble, although run at the speed all originally default,
i would push your e8600 to 4.8 if you can....
update singol card!!
ddr3 up
vga up
tomorrow i try the c.f for the 145k:rolleyes:
http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/1112/106kkmf6.jpg
cpu liquid cooling!!
tomorrow i try 900/960 liquid cooling!!
http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/252/146gc3.jpg
5 GHZ ON WATER
dear god this thing is a beast
1 question :p which is the batch of that CPU? i didn't read that in other page of this thread :s
q822a435
Woa! Nice Scores! You should try LN2 for best Scores! :D
Sorry man, but your Scores are not with CPU on air or water. I have seen your Compare @hwbot, your CPU must be on LN2, because it ist not on 8x 6xxx, its on 10x 6xx.
Look guys here is the Compare: http://service.futuremark.com/result...eResultType=10
no on the orb if you lower the multiplier from default which is 10x on e8600 to say 8 like spl it still times the fsb by the default multiplier which shows 6ghz instead of 600fsb by 8, 4.8 ghz that its actually running at same on everybodys its just a bug of the orb
Orb bug ... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Kovsk
Using LN2, with his VGA clocks, 150k are past ;) When 4870X2s go on LN2, scores will be >> 155k ;)
theres alot of those lolQuote:
Originally Posted by George_o/c
Dam... jejeje i want one of that :p difficult to find orr just new batch?Quote:
Originally Posted by spl
spl, can you explain why others are needing over 6 GHz to have a prayer to match your scores??
3d03 is bugged...I'm sure that spl score is right...The others have low score...but first place on hwbot is strange...Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
I have tested many and many time 3d03...bug:shrug:
I know...but his GT2's are still untouchable. At 600x8, I get "only" 1170 fps.
And surely there's some trick to dodge this bugginess, no? :)
Clearly Kinc and spl have figured something out that none of the rest of us have. :p:
yes it seems a low cpu clock for the score but all the test scores add up so it seems right imho, most of the bugged scores have a normal wings of fury fps for the cpu speed ,a proxycon and trolls lair thats too fast for the cpu speed and a low nature score for the cpu speed, there is a couple on hwbot top twenty which have the giveaway low nature score for 130k nature should be 970fps upwards
My scores-
4.5GHz
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~gautamb/128601.jpg
4.8 GHz
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~gautamb/133429.jpg
05 at 4.8GHz looks okay...
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~gautamb/33854.jpg
I don't think it's bugged, there's something else going on here. Could be board related, all cores not running the same speed, AI...we'll figure it out if we keep digging.
Just for the record, you guys all bench with a desktop resolution of 1024x768, right?
A magician never gives away his secrets, no ;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
Right
A different resolution don't give 10k + or-
Could it be so simple, LOL post #74 :D
Unfortunately no :(
I've tried everything in the book, every possible OS, every possible resolution, BIOS flashed clocks, CCC set clocks, etc. I've lost plenty of sleep over the past week and a half on this. :p: The scores I posted are "high" scores, if you look around you'll see many lower. A "low" score for 4.5GHz is 120-122k, and a "low" score for 4.8GHz is about 125k. Then on top of that spl has a very high GT2 (GT3 and GT4 are also very good)...however I think I might have the answer to that now.
It worked for me in the past. The first run is pretty much equal, but if you re-run, your score will decrease if you use another resolution than 1024x768 ... try it.Quote:
Originally Posted by gandalfone
I thought this was basic knowledge about 03?
That's not entirely true here. The first time I switched resolutions, my scores did get somewhat of a boost, but really you can replicate them at any resolution you want, as long as you run enough times.
Yeah.. It's not the resolution like it was in the past with Nvidia cards.
I can't understand spl's score. GT 2, 3 and 4 are way too high for those clocks.
If you can, please tell us something spl.
If this is something really easy again, I will eat my hat or something :) These are usually too easy bug's to solve.
One of my friends just showed me a very bugged 03 run at 4500MHz, 151k, with extremely high FPS for the last 3 tests.
this same thing happened on 3870x2 cfx look at kinc and elmors old 131k score there gt1 and gt4 rep there card clocks/cpu speed but there gt2/3 suffered so this is nothing new just the power of these cards now shows the massive score increase from it running bad or runing good
03 car low bug so to speak :(
Yes I know...but don't 10k difference:)Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
Quote:
Originally Posted by G H Z
Yes...for me this is
Yesterday 1 4870x2 liquid tested....I was go crazy....When I try I launch troll test...if bug 800fps at start....if not bug 1000. If I see 1000 stop test and launch intere bench and I take "normal" score 128k at 4500Mhz vga default...but...if I Oc vga I take equally bug score.
Sorry for my English....is very hard for me explain that I think:D
like this maybe??Quote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/5...8671000we5.jpg
if ya like that then give THIS one a try
http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/1...8261000ts5.jpg
:shakes:
now im not accusing ANYONE (except ME) of cheating, im just showing what can be done with this bug
i can post compare links if you really want me to but as of now i have not made them public
.
.
There's no foul play at all here...it's just damned hard to tell what's "real" and what's "bugged" at this point.
FWIW I've never been able to get high bugged scores ever. spl's are very consistent though, so his don't look like a bug at all.
i can consistently get this bug and even manipulate it to some extent.
its going to be fun weeding these out :(
i think i have the same problem, (during my non SUPER bug runs) my troll's test is very low but the rest of them are good.Quote:
Originally Posted by gandalfone
so you open 03, select JUST troll's and look for the very first FPS, if its 1000 you quit the test and run a FULL set of test.
if its 800 then you close and try again?
this only happens when you are @ stock and troll's is always a bad score when you OC the card?
We need a 3dmark03 calculator. Joe camel yours are easy to spot because GT2 is MUCH higher than GT1, which I believe should never be the case... GT2 is always lower than GT1.
128k is still too low, spl would get 135k+ at 4.5GHz.Quote:
Originally Posted by gandalfone
ill see if i can tweak the bug into making that less noticeableQuote:
Originally Posted by ahmad
not that i want to cheat but to help us understand this bug and remove it from ORB/HwBot
Joe on a side note which 4870x2 or what card bios are you using as i notice on ati overdrive the gpu core max is 900 instead of 800
No, reboot sistem...only way.Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Camel
Not only, It's happens random, sure if when I OC vgaQuote:
Originally Posted by Joe Camel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Camel
Congrats WR:ROTF:
200k go go go :rofl:
update!!
jast formatted
prommy on the cpu but not on limit!
work in progress!!
http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/4561/150fe0.jpg
spl please enlighten us man ... What is it that you do and get that high GT2 fps ? Don't tell me that you already know how to manipulate that strange-SUPER bug that Joe Camel found ... :D j/k man, plz tell something though ...
prove it's not bug run. why not show your GT2 score?
no bug in my score!!
this is the max with prommy
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5927455 150k
last with promm
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/3636/154kyb4.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by spl
That's great. GPU 850 for GT2 1380.:confused:
Andre look at the used driver