Just out of curiousity and combined 2x512 Mushkin Blue w/ black pcb on slots 3&4 and Gskill LA/tccd440 on slots 1&2
And really low sandra....
Just out of curiousity and combined 2x512 Mushkin Blue w/ black pcb on slots 3&4 and Gskill LA/tccd440 on slots 1&2
And really low sandra....
Last edited by Dumo; 04-06-2005 at 10:11 PM.
hehe interesting
---
I will try with 2T...
are you running a DDR200 (1/2) divider?
VX/UTT Voltage Scaling, please contribute...
10x260 _ 1T-2-2-2-8-7-15 _ 3.3vDIMM _ 1.75vCORE
Mobile 3400+ CG 0437XDPW
DFI LanParty UT
XP120 w/ 120mm Thermaltake Thunderblade
2x512MB OCZ VX
BBATI 9800np w/Infineon
PC Power & Cooling 510w Deluxe
No divider...ran 230x12 @ 1T.
why does it say 115mhz memory then?
All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
Now ran with cpc off 2T @ 1:1
So far, 240 @ 2T is a compromised setting which tccd and bh5(or ch?) can meet @3.1V
Last edited by Dumo; 04-08-2005 at 06:30 PM.
64 tweaker by default
Last edited by Dumo; 04-08-2005 at 07:09 PM.
2T/1:1 beating 1T/1:1? Its pretty much for sure using a divider in that case.
All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
Well now you got the 1:1 going. Nice. Can you go back to 230 1T 2-2-2? I'm doubting that can be done since most TCCD won't get up that high at tightest timings. However any four 512mb sticks at 1T any speed would be encouraging.
Sourcing parts for a mildly over clocked abacus.
Here man..why you doubting me? Try run 2GB mem. and you can see. B/way this with cpc on which means 1T and 1:1 same as my first post and tweaker on default/no changesOriginally Posted by STEvil
And this back to 2T....and AM3 with 4x512..http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...run=1361237359
Last edited by Dumo; 04-08-2005 at 06:43 PM.
Ooops. Most TCCD won't but you seem to to have the uber TCCDOriginally Posted by gundamit
Gskill LA @235 with 2-2-2-5 ... heh ... just saw that thread again.
Sourcing parts for a mildly over clocked abacus.
I just wanna try to find a setting that can bring these two memory chips together @2GB. So far with my system it is 240 -2T -2-2-2-5 @ 3.1V.
Because CPU-Z shows 1:2 divider, Sandra scores are horrible, and 2T is giving better scores.Originally Posted by Dumo
All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
Amazing!! Never thought about this. Interesting and good job bro!
interesting BH-5 is carrying TCCD to 240mhz 2-2-2-5 ? can you pass memtest #5 and #8 loops in memtest86+ v1.55.1 ?
---
Is this 316 bios?
I could not boot up..even use same ram for all 4 dimms
99.99% sure you're running 2T even if a64tweaker says otherwise as your 240mhz 2-2-2-5 sandra buffered of 6k corresponds closely to my 4x 256MB XMS3500C2v1.1 BH-5 @243mhz 2-2-2-6 2T at http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=58556Originally Posted by Kunaak
Could be when you set 1T, cpu overrides you and forces mem divider to lower ram speed hence getting lower bandwidth at 1T than 2T
Last edited by eva2000; 04-07-2005 at 09:37 AM.
---
Nice experiments there Dumo. Since u are running 2gb, try running cinebench 2003 with your highest oc on 2gb and see what happens.
It would be SO cool if you and OPB squared off. It seems OPB always ends up beating bachus. Would love to see an OPB vs Dumo squaring off on highest fsb, etc..heck u guys even have such similar rigs lol
It is with 2.17 bios and 2gb mem. with cpc on (1T enabled) will be defaulted to 1/2 divider. With 2T though games ran so smooth Will try run 3D benches with max. oc on cpu and vid. card. Good thing is Gskill LA by itself can scale to 240/2-2-2-5 stable @3.1V.
Thats the issue right there...when all 4 dimms are filled the winnie/FX's set the ram to run at a divider and 2T...this is not a MB issue or ram issue...but a CPU issue...Originally Posted by eva2000
The Vinnie/Deigo's are supposed to fix this issue...but so far it looks like the vinnies are still running at 2T with all of the dimms filled again...
Asus (Native) ROG Rampage Formula
E6400 ()
TRU 120 Extreme w/Scythe 120mm 110CFM
2x1G Ballistix DD2 (D9GMH)
Sapphire Toxic HD 3870
Diamomd Viper HD 3850
600w OCZ GameXstream
venices are NOT supposed to fix the 2t issue. they are only supposed to be making 100% officially 4x double sided sticks stable at ddr400 @ 2t. right now winnies/newcastles/claws are rated by amd with 4 x single sided sticks, ddr400 @ 2t, and 4x double sided sticks at ddr333 (not sure if thats 1 or 2 t, would expect 2 t still).
venices are ONLY changing the rating for single sided sticks to 1t, double sided is just getting a speed bump. but as shown here, thats "official" ratings. Aren't any official 4Ghz ath fx's either
ITs VERY good news that they are rating the mem controller at faster speeds for 4 single and double sided sticks, it makes running at 1t with 2 gb's more likely that it is now, but theres no garentee.
Mail Me | 3500+ , dfi sli-dr, g-skill la, 2x6800gt, 600w pcz, stacker case, air cooled
so in conclusion running 4 sticks can't be done at 1T without a forced 1/2 divider.
also seems like everyone's dream of 250 2-2-2-5 1T with 4x512mb is not going to be happening anytime soon with Venice either.
Bookmarks