Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 36

Thread: TCCD440 and BH5 combo @ 4x512

  1. #1
    XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,523

    Gskill LA/TCCD440 and Mushkin Blue/BH5 combo @ 4x512

    Just out of curiousity and combined 2x512 Mushkin Blue w/ black pcb on slots 3&4 and Gskill LA/tccd440 on slots 1&2

    And really low sandra....
    Last edited by Dumo; 04-06-2005 at 10:11 PM.

  2. #2
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    hehe interesting
    ---

  3. #3
    XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,523
    I will try with 2T...

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    1,012
    are you running a DDR200 (1/2) divider?
    VX/UTT Voltage Scaling, please contribute...

    10x260 _ 1T-2-2-2-8-7-15 _ 3.3vDIMM _ 1.75vCORE

    Mobile 3400+ CG 0437XDPW
    DFI LanParty UT
    XP120 w/ 120mm Thermaltake Thunderblade
    2x512MB OCZ VX
    BBATI 9800np w/Infineon
    PC Power & Cooling 510w Deluxe

  5. #5
    XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,523
    No divider...ran 230x12 @ 1T.

  6. #6
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    why does it say 115mhz memory then?

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  7. #7
    Xtreme 3D Mark Team Staff
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Juneau Alaska
    Posts
    7,607
    it has to be running a divider. no other reason it would be that low.




    "The command and conquer model," said the EA CEO, "doesn't work. If you think you're going to buy a developer and put your name on the label... you're making a profound mistake."

  8. #8
    XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,523
    Now ran with cpc off 2T @ 1:1

  9. #9
    XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,523
    So far, 240 @ 2T is a compromised setting which tccd and bh5(or ch?) can meet @3.1V
    Last edited by Dumo; 04-08-2005 at 06:30 PM.

  10. #10
    XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,523
    64 tweaker by default
    Last edited by Dumo; 04-08-2005 at 07:09 PM.

  11. #11
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    2T/1:1 beating 1T/1:1? Its pretty much for sure using a divider in that case.

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  12. #12
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,428
    Well now you got the 1:1 going. Nice. Can you go back to 230 1T 2-2-2? I'm doubting that can be done since most TCCD won't get up that high at tightest timings. However any four 512mb sticks at 1T any speed would be encouraging.
    Sourcing parts for a mildly over clocked abacus.

  13. #13
    XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,523
    Quote Originally Posted by STEvil
    2T/1:1 beating 1T/1:1? Its pretty much for sure using a divider in that case.
    Here man..why you doubting me? Try run 2GB mem. and you can see. B/way this with cpc on which means 1T and 1:1 same as my first post and tweaker on default/no changes

    And this back to 2T....and AM3 with 4x512..http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...run=1361237359
    Last edited by Dumo; 04-08-2005 at 06:43 PM.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,428
    Quote Originally Posted by gundamit
    Well now you got the 1:1 going. Nice. Can you go back to 230 1T 2-2-2? I'm doubting that can be done since most TCCD won't get up that high at tightest timings. However any four 512mb sticks at 1T any speed would be encouraging.
    Ooops. Most TCCD won't but you seem to to have the uber TCCD
    Gskill LA @235 with 2-2-2-5 ... heh ... just saw that thread again.
    Sourcing parts for a mildly over clocked abacus.

  15. #15
    XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,523
    I just wanna try to find a setting that can bring these two memory chips together @2GB. So far with my system it is 240 -2T -2-2-2-5 @ 3.1V.

  16. #16
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    Quote Originally Posted by Dumo
    Here man..why you doubting me?
    Because CPU-Z shows 1:2 divider, Sandra scores are horrible, and 2T is giving better scores.

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  17. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Land of Buckeye
    Posts
    2,881
    Amazing!! Never thought about this. Interesting and good job bro!

  18. #18
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    interesting BH-5 is carrying TCCD to 240mhz 2-2-2-5 ? can you pass memtest #5 and #8 loops in memtest86+ v1.55.1 ?
    ---

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Land of Buckeye
    Posts
    2,881
    Is this 316 bios?
    I could not boot up..even use same ram for all 4 dimms

  20. #20
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    Quote Originally Posted by Kunaak
    it has to be running a divider. no other reason it would be that low.
    99.99% sure you're running 2T even if a64tweaker says otherwise as your 240mhz 2-2-2-5 sandra buffered of 6k corresponds closely to my 4x 256MB XMS3500C2v1.1 BH-5 @243mhz 2-2-2-6 2T at http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=58556



    Could be when you set 1T, cpu overrides you and forces mem divider to lower ram speed hence getting lower bandwidth at 1T than 2T
    Last edited by eva2000; 04-07-2005 at 09:37 AM.
    ---

  21. #21
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Nice experiments there Dumo. Since u are running 2gb, try running cinebench 2003 with your highest oc on 2gb and see what happens.

    It would be SO cool if you and OPB squared off. It seems OPB always ends up beating bachus. Would love to see an OPB vs Dumo squaring off on highest fsb, etc..heck u guys even have such similar rigs lol

  22. #22
    XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,523
    It is with 2.17 bios and 2gb mem. with cpc on (1T enabled) will be defaulted to 1/2 divider. With 2T though games ran so smooth Will try run 3D benches with max. oc on cpu and vid. card. Good thing is Gskill LA by itself can scale to 240/2-2-2-5 stable @3.1V.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    327
    Quote Originally Posted by eva2000
    Could be when you set 1T, cpu overrides you and forces mem divider to lower ram speed hence getting lower bandwidth at 1T than 2T
    Thats the issue right there...when all 4 dimms are filled the winnie/FX's set the ram to run at a divider and 2T...this is not a MB issue or ram issue...but a CPU issue...

    The Vinnie/Deigo's are supposed to fix this issue...but so far it looks like the vinnies are still running at 2T with all of the dimms filled again...
    Asus (Native) ROG Rampage Formula
    E6400 ()
    TRU 120 Extreme w/Scythe 120mm 110CFM
    2x1G Ballistix DD2 (D9GMH)
    Sapphire Toxic HD 3870
    Diamomd Viper HD 3850
    600w OCZ GameXstream

  24. #24
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    London,Uk
    Posts
    950
    venices are NOT supposed to fix the 2t issue. they are only supposed to be making 100% officially 4x double sided sticks stable at ddr400 @ 2t. right now winnies/newcastles/claws are rated by amd with 4 x single sided sticks, ddr400 @ 2t, and 4x double sided sticks at ddr333 (not sure if thats 1 or 2 t, would expect 2 t still).

    venices are ONLY changing the rating for single sided sticks to 1t, double sided is just getting a speed bump. but as shown here, thats "official" ratings. Aren't any official 4Ghz ath fx's either

    ITs VERY good news that they are rating the mem controller at faster speeds for 4 single and double sided sticks, it makes running at 1t with 2 gb's more likely that it is now, but theres no garentee.
    Mail Me | 3500+ , dfi sli-dr, g-skill la, 2x6800gt, 600w pcz, stacker case, air cooled

  25. #25
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Ohio, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,697
    so in conclusion running 4 sticks can't be done at 1T without a forced 1/2 divider.
    also seems like everyone's dream of 250 2-2-2-5 1T with 4x512mb is not going to be happening anytime soon with Venice either.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •