Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: 90nm 3200 @ 306MHz 1:1

  1. 10-24-2004, 05:02 AM #1
    ISS
    ISS is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    90

    90nm 3200 @ 306MHz 1:1

    Pretty similar config to others. Looks like 90nm chips are really good overclockers.

    MSI K8N Neo 2
    A64 3200
    2 x 256MB PDP 3200XL (Samsung TCCD).







    No additional tweak done to memory. All are BIOS defaults.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-24-2004, 05:08 AM #2
    Jack
    Jack is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    985
    looking good

    what kinda cooling are you using?
    and what is the stock voltage for 90nm A64's?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-24-2004, 05:14 AM #3
    Drisler
    Drisler is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Somewhere I Belong
    Posts
    548
    Send a message via AIM to Drisler Send a message via Yahoo to Drisler
    Try a whole multipler?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-24-2004, 05:22 AM #4
    ISS
    ISS is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by Drisler
    Try a whole multipler?
    That would be 9 and it will become 2.7GHz. I am using a zalman 7000a-Cu thus didn't want to risk anything yet.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-24-2004, 05:22 AM #5
    ISS
    ISS is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack
    looking good

    what kinda cooling are you using?
    and what is the stock voltage for 90nm A64's?
    The stock voltage is 1.4V.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-24-2004, 05:32 AM #6
    Drisler
    Drisler is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Somewhere I Belong
    Posts
    548
    Send a message via AIM to Drisler Send a message via Yahoo to Drisler
    Use 8, then.

    CPU-Z doesn't work correctly with half-multi's. The A64 has no 1/2 ram dividers. Your ram is really running around 289MHz (??). It's not "1:1".

    somebody correct me if i'm wrong.
    Last edited by Drisler; 10-24-2004 at 05:35 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-24-2004, 05:33 AM #7
    craig588
    craig588 is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    the cold place Temp: 5C
    Posts
    2,928
    Send a message via AIM to craig588 Send a message via MSN to craig588
    that is acctually /9
    2600/9= 288, which acctually still isn't bad
    For those of you about to post:
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-24-2004, 05:53 AM #8
    macci
    macci is offline
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    2,559
    Looking good
    Nice clock already on air.

    That would be 9 and it will become 2.7GHz. I am using a zalman 7000a-Cu thus didn't want to risk anything yet.
    Yea but you could do 289x9 and your RAM would be still running at the same speed
    [running with x.5 multiplier wont run the RAM in 1:1 mode, 306fsb 8.5 multi is 289ram (306x8.5/9)]
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-24-2004, 06:40 AM #9
    Mrki
    Mrki is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Switzerland DownTown
    Posts
    228
    damn nice

    32sekpi for 2600mhz ... go for more
    3000+ Winchester
    DFI SLI-D
    2x512 OCZ EL Rev.2
    OCZ 520Watt
    2x6800GT Inno3D SLI
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-24-2004, 08:56 AM #10
    Jack
    Jack is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    985
    Quote Originally Posted by macci
    Yea but you could do 289x9 and your RAM would be still running at the same speed
    [running with x.5 multiplier wont run the RAM in 1:1 mode, 306fsb 8.5 multi is 289ram (306x8.5/9)]
    but will there be any difference when you switch from 8,5x to 9x multiplier?
    since the mem and cpu freq. remain the same...

    8.5 x 306 = 2601
    9 x 289 = 2601
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 10-24-2004, 09:20 AM #11
    missme
    missme is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Ottawa Canada
    Posts
    45
    Send a message via MSN to missme


    how about mine?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 10-24-2004, 09:27 AM #12
    Crow
    Crow is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    280
    nice overclock
    your my idol
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 10-24-2004, 09:33 AM #13
    P4rthen0n
    P4rthen0n is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Portugal - Lisbon
    Posts
    35
    Send a message via MSN to P4rthen0n
    missme, cooling?

    "Portugal Overclockers Club"
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 10-24-2004, 09:42 AM #14
    missme
    missme is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Ottawa Canada
    Posts
    45
    Send a message via MSN to missme
    Tt112
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 10-24-2004, 10:26 AM #15
    perkam
    perkam is offline
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Send a message via MSN to perkam Send a message via Yahoo to perkam
    hey missme, how dd you actually decide between a Tt112, a Hyper 6, or the Tt Silenttower ???

    I mean, is the the one with the most copper showing or what ??
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 10-24-2004, 11:22 AM #16
    missme
    missme is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Ottawa Canada
    Posts
    45
    Send a message via MSN to missme
    Tt112=hyper6>Tt Silenttower in my opinion
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules