Looks like they have the card in hand, with a 3dMark 06 Score at 1920x1080:
Source: http://diybbs.zol.com.cn/11/198_101119.html
(Emoticon from source -->WTF 0_o )
Perkam
Looks like they have the card in hand, with a 3dMark 06 Score at 1920x1080:
Source: http://diybbs.zol.com.cn/11/198_101119.html
(Emoticon from source -->
Perkam
Last edited by perkam; 10-15-2010 at 01:56 PM.
thats fake the cards have 256bit membus acording to amd and speeds at 859/1200mhz
The man with the littel Barebone!
And proud Crew of!!!
Octeamdenmark.com
Shuttle SX38P2Pro Barebone E8600cpu and HD4870X2 gfx and 2gig Crusial Ballistix PC8500 Cl5 and 2x150gig Raptor in raid 0 and 1x750 gig seagate
Msi 790FX-GD70 Mobo Amd 955-965 PHII cpus and 2gig Crucial value PC10600@800mhz 7-5-5-15 1T
And 4x500GB Seagate 7200.12 in raid0
4xHD5770 in CFQ.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
I would be more willing to chalk up the bus width mistake to the fact that GPUz has yet to be updated to accomodate the newer cards.
If this was AFTER a new GPUz update for the 6800 series, then I agree it is fake, but when the card doesn't even show up as the 6870 (meaning GPUz is not updated) its a good chance the card, and the benchmark, is real.
Perkam
That bench run has nothing going for it at all... it tells us nothing.
It's CPU bottlenecked (SM2 score is in the toilet) and the PCI-E is at x8. What a waste of time.
Originally Posted by T_M
______
Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.
3DMark06 Is a completely pointless Benchmark for todays cards. It is almost 100% CPU limited nowadays.
A Vantage score or any actual game score would be much more useful. Even a Crysis benchmark is much more useful than this.
Plus it's not like its hard to spoof the name of your card in the driver .inf file.
3DMark06???
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks