The first review ASUS GTX 465 !!!

[Andrea deluxe]

the gpu are the same of 470? with cutted shader/bus?

[bakalu]

3DMark Vantage Performance

ASUS GTX 285 TOP


ASUS GTX 465 default


ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Devil May Cry 4 DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Super High

ASUS GTX 285 TOP


ASUS GTX 465 default


ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Resident Evil 5 DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Max Settings

ASUS GTX 285 TOP


ASUS GTX 465 default


ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Heaven Demo benchmark DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Tessellation=OFF, Max Settings

ASUS GTX 285 TOP


ASUS GTX 465 default


ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Heaven Demo benchmark DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Tessellation=moderate, Max Settings

ASUS GTX 465 default


ASUS GTX 465 @ 650/840


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Power consumption of the system includes GTX465 default and Core i7 965 @ 3.6GHz

idle


full load with Furmark


When the full load, power consumption of GTX465 is the same of HD5870.

[prznar1]

thx bakalu awsome job!

[bakalu]

I do not have HD5850, so I used ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 to emulator HD5850, driver ATI 104a Preview.

...to be continued

[xdan]

At least GTX 465 will have a very good custom quiet cooler from the begining but i think that 239$-249$ , 5830' price should have been more realistic.
Gigabyte GTX 465

[spinejam]

great job w/ the review!

[bakalu]

You want to compare the performance of GTX465 and HD5850, I do not have HD5850, so I used ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 to emulator HD5850, driver ATI 104a Preview. Some benchmark results are as follows

3DMark Vantage Performance

ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Crysis Warhead. 1680*1050, NoAA, Enthusiast DX10, ambush map

ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Call of Juarez DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X Multi_sampling, Max Settings

ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


S.T.A.L.K.E.R Call of Pripyat DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Max Settings, Tessellation=ON

ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Demo benchmark Dirt 2 DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Ultra Settings. POST PROCESS=MEDIUM

ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000, DirectX 11


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 11


Benchmark Bad Company 2 DX11. I play the first scene. Use Fraps. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Max Settings

ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000

2010-05-30 15:18:03 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 9722 - Time: 153999ms - Avg: 63.130 - Min: 46 - Max: 89

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925

2010-05-28 1458 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 9406 - Time: 159798ms - Avg: 58.862 - Min: 44 - Max: 81

Benchmark Metro 2033. I play the first scene. Use Fraps. 1680*1050, NoAA, AF=16X, Very High, PhysX=ON

ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000, DirectX 9

2010-05-30 15:23:41 - metro2033
Frames: 10975 - Time: 246314ms - Avg: 44.557 - Min: 16 - Max: 89

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 9

2010-05-28 1453 - metro2033
Frames: 8827 - Time: 235842ms - Avg: 37.428 - Min: 17 - Max: 76

ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000, DirectX 10

2010-05-30 15:43:12 - metro2033
Frames: 8245 - Time: 230943ms - Avg: 35.701 - Min: 15 - Max: 72

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 10

2010-05-28 1409 - metro2033
Frames: 7585 - Time: 228995ms - Avg: 33.123 - Min: 16 - Max: 70

ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000, DirectX 11

2010-05-30 16:14:37 - metro2033
Frames: 5383 - Time: 242625ms - Avg: 22.187 - Min: 12 - Max: 38

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 11

2010-05-28 1406 - metro2033
Frames: 5128 - Time: 231864ms - Avg: 22.116 - Min: 13 - Max: 38

Devil May Cry 4 DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Super High

ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Resident Evil 5 DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Max Settings

ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Heaven Demo benchmark DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Tessellation=moderate, Max Settings

ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Aliens vs. Predator DirectX 11 Benchmark. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Tessellation=ON, Max Settings

ASUS Maxtrix HD 5870 @ 725/1000

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Video Settings from file <AvP_Benchmark_Config.txt>:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 3
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 4


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 3258
Average Frame Time: 32.2ms
Average FPS: 31.1

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Video Settings from file <AvP_Benchmark_Config.txt>:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 3
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 4


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 3034
Average Frame Time: 34.6ms
Average FPS: 28.9

Tomorrow I may have HD5850 and I will test all the games again.

[kaktus1907]

awesome review is awesome

[Neox69]

Wow, I almost thought the GTX465 was POS, but after this review.... I might just sack F it and get me one if I can find it cheaply! I only game on an 20" LCD anyway.

[saaya]

nice review!
some thumbnails would have been nice instead of all those huge pics that somehow load very slowly...

mhhh the fact alone that you compare it to a gtx285 and have to mention that it DOES perform better is really all there is to say, isnt it? i mean yeah, it is faster, but the performance gain is so low that you have to point out its faster...

if somebody would switch your rig from a 285 to a 465 i dont think youd notice the difference at all...

and a 465 costs 300$... isnt that close to what gtx285 cards sold for a year ago? so basically you spend 300$ to get dx11 and be able to bench unigine and play 3 or 4 games with some additional special effects that are so minimal its hard to tell if they are enabled or not... now THIS is progress!

seriously... 300$ is way too high for this level of performance...
it should be 200$... and even then it wouldnt be all that great as a 5770 isnt exactly slow and costs 150$...
sorry for the threadcrap :P
very nice review, thanks a lot for all the time and effort!

[Leeghoofd]

move the piccies to another ftp man, it's taking aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaages to load

[bakalu]

To compare the performance of ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925 and ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150, GTX465 and HD5850 run stable at that clock without having to increase voltage, driver ATI 10.5a hotfix. Some benchmark results are as follows :

3DMark Vantage Performance

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Crysis Warhead. 1680*1050, NoAA, Enthusiast DX10, ambush map

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Call of Juarez DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X Multi_sampling, Max Settings

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


S.T.A.L.K.E.R Call of Pripyat DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Max Settings, Tessellation=ON

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Demo benchmark Dirt 2 DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Ultra Settings. POST PROCESS=MEDIUM

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150, DirectX 11


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 11


Benchmark Bad Company 2 DX11. I play the first scene. Use Fraps. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Max Settings

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150

2010-05-31 16:13:00 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 10247 - Time: 151026ms - Avg: 67.849 - Min: 44 - Max: 95

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925

2010-05-28 1458 - BFBC2Game
Frames: 9406 - Time: 159798ms - Avg: 58.862 - Min: 44 - Max: 81

Benchmark Metro 2033. I play the first scene. Use Fraps. 1680*1050, NoAA, AF=16X, Very High, PhysX=ON

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150, DirectX 9

2010-05-31 16:34:46 - metro2033
Frames: 10943 - Time: 228982ms - Avg: 47.790 - Min: 18 - Max: 95

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 9

2010-05-28 1453 - metro2033
Frames: 8827 - Time: 235842ms - Avg: 37.428 - Min: 17 - Max: 76

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150, DirectX 10

2010-05-31 16:28:21 - metro2033
Frames: 8433 - Time: 225717ms - Avg: 37.361 - Min: 18 - Max: 80

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 10

2010-05-28 1409 - metro2033
Frames: 7585 - Time: 228995ms - Avg: 33.123 - Min: 16 - Max: 70

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150, DirectX 11

2010-05-31 16:21:28 - metro2033
Frames: 5452 - Time: 229603ms - Avg: 23.745 - Min: 14 - Max: 37

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925, DirectX 11

2010-05-28 1406 - metro2033
Frames: 5128 - Time: 231864ms - Avg: 22.116 - Min: 13 - Max: 38

Devil May Cry 4 DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Super High

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Resident Evil 5 DX10. 1680*1050, AA=4X, Max Settings

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Heaven Demo benchmark DX11. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Tessellation=moderate, Max Settings

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150


ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925


Aliens vs. Predator DirectX 11 Benchmark. 1680*1050, AA=4X, AF=16X, Tessellation=ON, Max Settings

ASUS HD 5850 @ 800/1150

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Video Settings from file <AvP_Benchmark_Config.txt>:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 3
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 4


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 3589
Average Frame Time: 29.2ms
Average FPS: 34.2

ASUS GTX 465 @ 700/925

*DX11 Hardware Detected*

Using Video Settings from file <AvP_Benchmark_Config.txt>:

Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Texture Quality: 3
Shadow Quality: 3
Anisotropic Filtering: 16
SSAO: ON
Vertical Sync: OFF
DX11 Tessellation: ON
DX11 Advanced Shadows: ON
DX11 MSAA Samples: 4


Benchmark Summary:

Number of frames: 3034
Average Frame Time: 34.6ms
Average FPS: 28.9

HD5850 @ 800/1150 is much stronger than GTX465 @ 700/925, however HD5850 @ 800/1150 can not play DX11 Metro 2033 at resolution 1680*1050 .

[umvue]

Some Asus GTX 465 can use accompanying software to unlock diabled cores and it performs very close to 470

[The Duke]

wow sooooo much info in this thread I had to take a break haha ... keep up the massive testing i had no idea the 465 was gonna put out those types of numbers

[davidexD]

OC Max ASUS GTX 465 with stock fan



I'm testting stable ASUS GTX 465 at core/memory 700/925, will be reviewed soon.

do you reach this settings by increasing voltage right?how much did you increase?with the asus software^

[txtsd]

probably a stupid question, but will i get similar overclockability if I buy an EVGA GTX 465 instead of a ASUS GTX 465?

[initialised]

probably a stupid question, but will i get similar overclockability if I buy an EVGA GTX 465 instead of a ASUS GTX 465?

Probably, I have tested an INNO and an ASUS GTX465 (as used here) and found overclcoking performance to be similar to what has been posted here and other reviews on both (reference) cards.



I tried using the ASUS unlock tool on both of these cards and it hasn't worked on either. Perhaps ASUS is holding it back for a Matrix Version or something.

[nadeem1414]

there are lot of informational channels which are providing the knowledge and information, but i was just visiting to this "web site" which is very informative and interested, so i like to visit as like the sites.