Why not simply call it TRUE rev. D. The only chance they've got is if they used ultra hitech materials or some very special heatpipes. But knowing TR and how they like to rebrand every product without improving it this will probably be the same.
Why not simply call it TRUE rev. D. The only chance they've got is if they used ultra hitech materials or some very special heatpipes. But knowing TR and how they like to rebrand every product without improving it this will probably be the same.
looking forward to it, hope the price is good.
Q9550 E0 @3.8 - zalman CNPS9700 NT - GA-EP45-UD3R rev 1.1 - OCZ Reaper 2x2GB DDR2 1066
GTX 285 SSC - Thermaltake Toughpower 850W - Samsung 2220WM 22" LCD - win7 x64
thats it...? 1 more heatpipe???
does thermalright still have any engineers working in their labs or what? :P
Since the TRUE has the same number of heatpipes but arranged differently they didn't go through so much trouble. What to expect from a company who's best engineers left and formed a new company.
is there a need for a better air cooler? a decent one can keep a pretty beefy cpu cool with a very slow fan. and since theres no 250W TDP chips coming out for a desktop, whats the point of worrying about making a heatsink that can do very well, but fit in only a few cases, and only be sold to people who dont plan on WCing. it would probably be too expensive to design/make, and not sell enough of them since it would be a niche market.
i do believe air cooling is pretty much done until we see a new standard for socket designs that can offer something which brings a large jump in possibilities.
vs
i dnt think both r same
as u can see the top one has sharp cuts in the fins where as the bottom one shows smooth fins ...
i think either experview posted older pics or the other guy posted wrong images
[i7 920 @ 4.48Ghz TRU 120+MX3 || ASUS P6T || CHAINTECH 2x2GB 1800mhz 6-7-8-22 || SPARKLE 460GTX 1GB 905/1065/1810||SGATE 1TB+640GB||CORSAIR TX 750|| VX 2433 || CM 690 || NZXT FANCONTROLER ]
i7 920 @ 4.48Ghz+Tru120+Asus P6T
I7 920 @ 3.9Ghz+stock+Intel DX58SO
Q9550 @4Ghz (445x9)+Tru120+Giga p45
Q6600@4Ghz (445x9)+Tru 120+Giga Ga p35ds3r n Asus Maximus 2
E5200@4.2Ghz+Tru 120+Ga p35ds3r
E6750@3.95Ghz+asus ss pro+Asus p5Kvm
E4500@3.63Ghz+Asus SS+spro+Asus p5kvm
Join me on Pakistan's First Overclocking Forum
Thermalright should rename it GTS 120 EXTREME
--lapped Q9650 #L828A446 @ 4.608, 1.45V bios, 1.425V load.
-- NH-D14 2x Delta AFB1212SHE push/pull and 110 cfm fan -- Coollaboratory Liquid PRO
-- Gigabyte EP45-UD3P ( F10 ) - G.Skill 4x2Gb 9600 PI @ 1221 5-5-5-15, PL8, 2.1V
- GTX 480 ( 875/1750/928)
- HAF 932 - Antec TPQ 1200 -- Crucial C300 128Gb boot --
Primary Monitor - Samsung T260
Too bad they didn't have the heatpipes come in direct contact with the core.
CPU: Intel i5-3570K @ 4.2ghz (1.064V)
GPU: SLI ASUS GTX 660 Ti DCII 2GB @ 1215/7012
LCD: BenQ XL2420TE (144Hz)
Mobo: ASRock Z77 Extreme6
Sound: SoundBlaster ZXR + Yamaha RX-V863 (LPCM) + Polk Audio Monitor Series II Speakers
RAM: G.SKILL Sniper Series DDR3 2133 4x4GB
Storage: Samsung 840 Pro 128GB + 1TB Seagate Barracuda +1TB WD Black Caviar
PSU: Corsair HX 750W 80+ Silver (62A)
UPS: Cyberpower CP1200AVR (720W)
OS: Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Cooling: Corsair 650D + TT Water2.0 Pro + 2x Silverstone FM121
i think it has to do with pressure. since a heatpipe is probably too soft to get real contact, for direct touch blocks, the copper base acts like a frame and absorbs most of the pressure and dramatically reduces the surface area. so the heat limitation is now from the cpu getting to the base. while top end coolers have better heat pull from the cpu to the base, but slightly worse getting from the base to the pipes.
i remember seeing that cyclone looking thing before, probably not that exact version though
i think they are too big for most applications. good idea. i just dont think we have the socket location ready for such things.
Wow...
If thats going to become the standard base finish for venemous / ultra120 revD thats going to be amazing.
--lapped Q9650 #L828A446 @ 4.608, 1.45V bios, 1.425V load.
-- NH-D14 2x Delta AFB1212SHE push/pull and 110 cfm fan -- Coollaboratory Liquid PRO
-- Gigabyte EP45-UD3P ( F10 ) - G.Skill 4x2Gb 9600 PI @ 1221 5-5-5-15, PL8, 2.1V
- GTX 480 ( 875/1750/928)
- HAF 932 - Antec TPQ 1200 -- Crucial C300 128Gb boot --
Primary Monitor - Samsung T260
yup, that was what I said.... (and btw TRUE is based off another companies HSF; TR didn't do tower coolers for quite some time)
any way do you see a way to improve surface area, heat dissipation, while keeping in line with size and weight and price restrictions? we're running out of variations quite quickly; we've had the major HSF upgrades, none from the last 3-4 years have really stood out, major game changers so far:
- Going from alu to copper
- Adding Heatpipes to copper
- Tower coolers
.... all they've done now since the first tower coolers were introduced is add heatpipes and slightly tweak layout/fin size/amount. But a major step with current materials I'm not expecting. and with the size of the base being the decisive factor for adding heat pipes, you can only fit "so many" in that square... layered heatpipes don't have quite the same effect...
the only other semi-practical change is to go direct touch
Current System:
eVGA 680i SLi "A2" P30 BIOS
intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (currently at stock)
OCZ ReaperX 4GB DDR2 1000 (running at DDR2 800 Speeds with cas4)
320GB Seagate 7200.10
XFX 8800GT XXX 512MB (stock clocks)
auzentech X-Fi Prelude
PC Power and Cooling Silencer 750 Quad Copper
Win XP Pro
Ryzen 9 3900X w/ NH-U14s on MSI X570 Unify
32 GB Patriot Viper Steel 3733 CL14 (1.51v)
RX 5700 XT w/ 2x 120mm fan mod (2 GHz)
Tons of NVMe & SATA SSDs
LG 27GL850 + Asus MG279Q
Meshify C white
I've seen the Hyper 212+ beat the TRUE and it uses direct contact.
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...review-12.html
one quick google and i found this
http://www.anandtech.com/casecooling...spx?i=3141&p=6
i would like to see a real test done to compare direct touch heatpipes with bases. id also like to see someone shave down the base of a true until the heaptpipes are exposed and see what happens (just for the fun and curiosity)
No direct heatpipe contact coolers as long as I have IHS off
all cooper
Asus P6T Deluxe, Intel i7 920 D0-SLBEJ, Prolimatech Megahalems + SmartCaseFanBlueLed 120 Thermaltake,
OCZ Blade Triple PC16000 6Gb, MSI R4890 T2D1G-OC, WD Caviar Black 1TB + Seagate 7200-250gb,
HX850 Corsair, BenQ G2410HD, Pioneer DVR-217miftahbanjar.com
- direct touch of the heatpipes to the base: as pointed out, doesn't necessarily improve performance
- more, thinner heatpipes: thinner = less heat that can be removed per heatpipe
- vaporchamber at the base: expensive?
- improved fin profile: I think we've maxed out surface area with those
- drum shape plus vga type fan: classic fan offers superior performance/noise ratio;
- Xigmatek Thor has thin heatpipes & direct touch, amongst others
- plenty of custom size/design HSF with integrated fans, they fail horribly in performance/noise rank
Bookmarks